Rciszewski
| This user is a student editor in University_of_Alabama/Relational_Communication_-_online_(Fall_2020) . |
Welcome!
editHello, Rciszewski, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 02:50, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Instructor Feedback for Draft
editOverall, I think you are making some nice improvements to the existing article by refining points throughout the article. I think the biggest area for improvement would be to discuss some more recent research that uses URT or challenges the principles of URT with its approach or findings. Here are some other things to consider as you revise. The first sentence could be more specific by saying that the theory explains how we gain knowledge about others. As it is written now it seems you are saying that uncertainty reduction theory is how we gain knowledge about others, which does not really make sense. In the "proactive uncertainty reduction" section try to avoid second person style by referring to the reader as "you." Use "people" "individuals" instead. I'm a little confused about the idea that axioms are considered self-evident and not to be tested. Axioms or propositions of theories should be tested to clarify and advance the theory. This is part of the scientific process. The axioms of URT have been tested quite a bit and new theories have been developed based on the findings. I'm not sure the Redmond (2015) source is a credible source for this topic. It does not appear to be published in a peer-reviewed journal. The claim that new information can lead to increased uncertainty is accurate, but I'm not sure that this claim is supported by URT (it is posited by other uncertainty theories however, such as uncertainty management theory). URT posits that more information leads to less uncertainty (axiom 1). This needs to be clarified to better align with the theory's axioms or revised to be more explicit about the contrast with URT. I think adding the Kellerman and Reynolds (1990) axioms is a nice contribution, but there needs to be more description about what these axioms look like in everyday life. The principles to reduce uncertainty section seems to be coming from the Redmond (2015) source. I'm a little confused about how these principles are distinct from the axioms and theorems. There needs to be a few sentences that set up these principles. Explain what they are in relation to the axioms and theorems of URT. What do they offer us in terms of understanding URT that the axioms and theorems don't already offer? Good idea to offer examples of reduction strategies, but I think you can make a distinct example for each strategy (passive, active, and interactive). As it stand now, readers might not be able to see the difference between active and interactive because there was no example for "active" provided. There could be more explanation and an example for disinhibition searching. Also, try to cite primary sources as your support rather than secondary sources like the Littlejohn textbook. The same recommendation applies to your contribution to the AUM theory in terms of high and low context cultures. The related theories section is a good idea. Since AUM is described above you probably don't need to include it here. Also, adding another sentence or two for each one to explain how it builds on URT and the main differences between URT and the related theory would be helpful here. Also, link to the Wikipedia page for this theories, if they exist. Jrpederson (talk) 20:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)