Rcnyc32

June 2009

To Alansohn and MuZemike: Please refrain from making any changes to a page about someone you have no dealings with. The changes made previously were made with the consent of John Lakian himself. Mr. Lakian absolutely does not consider any of the changes I have made, under his supervision, to be considered vandalism of any kind. Nice try, though. I will continue to make changes to the John Lakian page as he see's fit. Mr. Lakian has already been in contact with Wikipedia general counsel in regard to modifications made to the John Lakian page prior to 21 June 2009. Unfortunately, I am prohibited to speak any further on the topic due to legal circumstances. Thank you. rcnyc32 (talk) 13:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page John Lakian has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 19:45, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page John Lakian. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. MuZemike 19:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Lakian

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article John Lakian, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not notable. The article only says he ran in two elections and lost both.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Steve Dufour (talk) 17:45, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Robinjhewitt for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)