User talk:Reading Beans/Archives/2024/August

Liverpool 1 move closure

Talk:Liverpool 1 (TV series)

This should have been relisted since there are only two people and both opposed it, one of which was a weak oppose. However, the nominator/proposer rationale should also been taken into account whether or not WP:SMALLDETAILS should be applied since there are only one article called Liverpool 1 (minus the dab page). JuniperChill (talk) 09:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Hello @JuniperChill, your opinion as the nominator was opposed by two editors and none agreed with you. There was no need to relist the nomination as no other opinion aside from yours supported the nomination. It was——to me——a clear consensus to not move. Best, Reading Beans 09:42, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

I disagree. I wouldn't say its clear since only 2 people (other than me) participated in the discussion and I don't think a 1-2 oppose is a reason to close the discussion. I think more input is necessary into determining whether or not WP:SMALLDETAILS should be used since a third participant might have supported it. I agree that some people use Liverpool 1 to refer to the shopping complex (Liverpool One) and that the logo has the number in it. However, natural disambiguation (which I forgot to mention) is preferred since the TV series almost always uses 1 while the shopping area, not as much. Plus one participant stated that the shopping area has almost the same views as the TV series. JuniperChill (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

@JuniperChill, it is not a 2-1 oppose, if we are going by headcount, it is a 2-0. I have no opinion whatsoever in the move request. I only evaluated the discussion and came to the conclusion that there is no consensus to move. I could be wrong and that would mean that (a) you could renom in few months (b) request for a move review to determine if my closure was correct. Best, Reading Beans 10:19, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Per WP:RMCOMMENT the nomination generally implies support so it was a 2-1 oppose not 2-0 but there didn't appear to be a consensus to move. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

@Crouch, Swale, thank you for this, I was not aware of this policy. Yes, a consensus to move was not established. Best, Reading Beans 18:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Move review for Liverpool 1 (TV series)

An editor has asked for a Move review of Liverpool 1 (TV series). Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. JuniperChill (talk) 22:15, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2024_August#Liverpool_1_(TV_series)

Move reviews are not a continuation of the move request, it is there to determine if the move was done properly. I have provided the direct link for you for easy access. Best, Reading Beans 22:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Peller (comedian) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peller (comedian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peller (comedian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Getreallycool (talk) 22:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)

Missed a couple

Thanks for closing, but you missed moving a few. These are still at the capped titiles: Zimmermann Telegram, Ems Dispatch. Dicklyon (talk) 15:31, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

@Dicklyon, thank you for bringing it to my attention. I have done the corrections, let me know if I missed something. Best, Reading Beans 15:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Outcome description of RM at Talk:Homemade firearm

It would be nice if you would edit your closing summary to note that the article was moved to "Homemade firearm" rather than to "Ghost gun", which is what was originally proposed. This could help clarify the historical record for those who come along and read it later. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 15:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

@BarrelProof, I did but it only worked on the header. I’ll go ahead and fix it up now. Thank you for this. Best, Reading Beans 17:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. That looks good. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:11, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

September 2024 at Women in Red

Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317 Online events: New: Women writers & their works | Geofocus: Islands A - H Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) | Translation contest 2024 (Jul, Aug, Sep) Announcements from other communities August 30 is the tenth anniversary of WikiProject Women writers! Tip of the month: Try her pen name when searching for sources, and remember to add her to any of these that apply: List of pen names, List of literary initials, and Category:Pseudonymous women writers. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging