Realitytelevisionn

Welcome!

Hello, Realitytelevisionn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:18, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks User:Biografer

Realitytelevisionn, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Realitytelevisionn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Great British Bake Off (series 7) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Great British Bake Off (series 7) was changed by Realitytelevisionn (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.94252 on 2017-09-12T19:51:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:51, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Great British Bake Off (series 6). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: The Great British Bake Off (series 6) was changed by Realitytelevisionn (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865855 on 2017-09-12T19:52:55+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:52, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Realitytelevisionn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've just been blocked for no reason, a user that clearly cannot spell has just blocked my account. I stated I was reverting constructive edits that had previously been made by a sock account. However this is my only account, a previous investigation confirmed this.

Decline reason:

This is a "CheckUser" block, which means there is technical evidence connecting this account with others - and you should address that if you make a new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:49, 15 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Realitytelevisionn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

There's been a mistake this is my only account, as I'm using a shared IP address, User:ZestyLemonz could have also used the IP address, however this is my only account, I've made nothing but constructive edits. Therefore I should be unblocked

Decline reason:

So you're telling us it's entirely a coincidence that you share an IP address (and more, that's not all that gets checked) with a known sockpuppeteer who happens to make exactly the same edits as you? Sorry, I don't believe that. Huon (talk) 17:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add topic