User talk:RedBulbBlueBlood9911/Non-Flagship Smartphone-or-TabletComputer-or-FeaturePhone Standard Article Structure

Comments

Thanks for developing this. Here are a few comments. ~Kvng (talk) 15:21, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

1. Consider improving Template:Infobox mobile phone/doc with your infobox suggestions.
2. Developed articles don't usually have citations in the lead.
3. (REVIEWER NAME) of (WEBSITE IN ITALICS) can be included in the citation. Including it in the text is not a problem but not required.

Hi Kvng, and thanks for your comments. I will be responding to each one inline:

1. Some of my suggestions are taken from the infobox (like the measurements). But if possible, I’ll consider improving the infobox.
2. I know, and this can be fixed if the information about the launch is added in a separate section. However, given that most news reports only say "xyz company has released abc model phone yesterday" or something like that before going to the specifications, we may have to move the info about the release elsewhere, and that will make the lead look too bland.
3. Actually, adding the name of the reviewer and website is a common practice used even on articles for Apple devices, which generally are at C or B class in terms of article quality. Hence, I think it should be recommended.

RedBulbBlueBlood9911|Talk 03:28, 1 June 2020 (UTC)