Wikipedia

User talk:Red Phoenix/Archive 6

< User talk:Red Phoenix
Latest comment: 3 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic Administrators' newsletter – October 2021
Archive 1←Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8

Shhhh

Latest comment: 4 years ago7 comments4 people in discussion

🥂🍾🎉🥳 Atsme Talk 📧 12:19, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

For starting this thread with "Shhhh" you're sure making a lot of noise, lol :P . Red Phoenix talk 12:24, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Adding that's what I do best, intentional or otherwise.   Atsme Talk 📧 18:04, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
It ain't over till the fat crat sings ... have a bit of a patience and the admin tools and related celebrations will be along in a couple of hours. On a more serious note, there were some seriously good answers to questions (particularly Q15) and I was quite impressed at how you fielded everything, actually. A good result, I think. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Hey Red, can I log into your account sometime to wreak havoc with the admin tools?   Congrats on your successful RfA! I think you'll be incredible with the mop. JOEBRO64 16:09, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
@TheJoebro64: No, you can't use my admin tools to delete Mario so Sonic the Hedgehog reigns supreme :P Red Phoenix talk 02:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Dammit. JOEBRO64 15:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Not a Crat, nor a Lady, but large and can sing

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
  • So I'm going to be BOLD and congratulate you as the newest addition to the mop corps - I'll add you to the Menagarie once a 'Crat has flipped the switch. Please enjoy a completely unnecessary wave of shiny buttons about to appear! Nosebagbear (talk) 15:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
I've classified you as an avian - but if you consider yourself more Magical/Paranormal or a colo(u)r, let me know! Nosebagbear (talk) 16:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Avian works just fine, thank you :) Red Phoenix talk 02:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Your request for adminship

Latest comment: 4 years ago14 comments14 people in discussion

Hi Red Phoenix, I have closed your request for adminship as successful. Congratulations for both your successful, landslide nomination and for your place on WP:RFX200 - excellent achievements! As always, the administrators' reading list is worth reading and the new admin help pages are most certainly available if you feel that you might require some practice with the tools in a safe environment prior to applying them elsewhere on the project. Good luck! Acalamari 16:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks everyone. I appreciate all the support - I was actually rather surprised the RFA went as smoothly as it did. I will do my best to make sure I don't let you down, and I'll try to get to that celebratory beer after my work week. Red Phoenix talk 02:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations

Latest comment: 4 years ago8 comments7 people in discussion
 

Congratulations on your successful request for adminship. Well deserved. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 16:11, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

I marked your userpage with an admin tag, feel free to remove it if you wish. NYC Guru (talk) 22:01, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations on your landslide election! About the admin tag mentioned above: actually there are several kinds of admin bling you are now entitled to use. You can read about them here. -- MelanieN (talk) 22:51, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
What, no T-shirt yet? We can't have that. Here's one. Hope it's your size. -- MelanieN (talk) 22:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
Aw man, can someone print this and mail it to me irl? :P Red Phoenix talk 02:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to the corps! Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 08:26, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations and good luck. Donner60 (talk) 03:29, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations on your successful request for adminship. Thanks for making yourself available. - Ret.Prof (talk) 13:37, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Cheers Amigo

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Following my question here & your solid reply I’m confident you’d do a good job with the mop. Common sense is a trait I look for in any individual & from your reply it’s indicative you have that in abundance. Congratulations dear colleague & a bottle of cold beer 🍺 for you. That is, if you drink. Celestina007 20:14, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much. That cold beer sounds good right now. Red Phoenix talk 02:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Delete

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Mind deleting this, there are to many drafts on this subject. Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:27, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

And congrats on getting the mop. Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 12:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. Your request has been granted. Red Phoenix talk 12:30, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

PyroJay1987

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Hi Red Phoenix, will you please block this account. There is a report at AIV but they are doing rapid vandalism, currently at Ocala, Florida. S0091 (talk) 22:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Nevermind. Nosebagbear got it. S0091 (talk) 22:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 September newsletter

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were

  •   Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
  •  HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
  •   Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.

Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:53, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  Eddie891
  Angela • Jcw69 • Just Chilling • Philg88 • Viajero

  CheckUser changes

  SQL

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
  • A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors must or should use the articles for creation process.
  • A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Immediate blocking of newbie user

Latest comment: 4 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

Hi Red Phoenix,

I notice that you have blocked a new user who tried (very clumsily) to improve Wikipedia by making their very first edit on a page that I watch, namely International Bomber Command Centre. I totally agree that the username of User:IBCC Market should be considered promotional under Wikipedia's Username policy, WP:ORGNAME, and should be changed. But that very same policy says that "Users who adopt such usernames, but who are not editing problematically in related articles, should not be blocked. Instead, they should be gently encouraged to change their username."

Given that the user did not understand how to upload a photo to Wikipedia, it seems likely that they will also not understand how to respond to the template that you posted on their talkpage.

I would offer to help them change the username, but of course I can't add to their talk page because they are now blocked. Are you willing to reconsider and unblock them for say a week, so that one of us can talk to them as recommended in the policy WP:BADNAME?

All the best

Hallucegenia (talk) 21:33, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Hallucegenia: You should still be able to edit their user talk page; the block doesn't affect your ability to leave them a message, and in fact, the block doesn't affect their ability to edit their own talk page either. Additionally, Red Phoenix chose to implement a soft block, which allows the user to simply register a new account with a new username right away without having to worry about requesting unblock—this is explained in the block notice that Red Phoenix left on their talk page. If they wish to rename their account instead, the block notice provides a link to that process as well. As far as the username policy goes, I see this block as within administrative discretion—everyday we see a lot of organizations try to edit their own article, which is oftentimes inherently problematic because it introduces a conflict of interest, and I don't see this account as an exception. Mz7 (talk) 02:28, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hi @Mz7: Do I understand you correctly? Are you saying it's OK to block this newbie user because of what he/she might do, not what they have actually done? Maybe I'm wrong, but that seems to me to be biting the newcomers of the worst sort. What do others think? Maybe we should change the wording of the WP:ORGNAME policy, because it says there quite specifically, with bold emphasis, that new accounts in these circumstances should not be blocked.
Regards Hallucegenia (talk) 18:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
@Hallucegenia: I do understand where you're coming from. Certainly I do not advocate blocking newcomers if they are "not editing problematically in related articles", e.g. if a user created a name that sounds like an organization, but the user has overall been productive and has not edited any articles related to that organization. This is not such a case. If you read the International Bomber Command Centre article, it seems pretty clear that someone affiliated with the organization edited the article to make it sound like an advertisement. When I stumbled across the article yesterday, the first sentence of the article described the subject as an award winning interpretation centre. The article goes onto use subjective phrasing in various places like one of the most comprehensive records and interactive and immersive exhibition. These phrases were added by same user who created the IBCC Market account, see Special:Contributions/2A00:23C6:61B9:DB00::/64. It seems quite likely that the interests of this user are not entirely to contribute to this encyclopedia, but rather to promote their own organization, and in general we should be discouraging editors from editing articles with which they have a conflict of interest. Mz7 (talk) 18:32, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
Hallucegenia, the block was appropriate. As Mz7 said it's a soft block so they can simply click the create a new account link. They don't even need to request an unblock. They do however need to declare their obvious COI. Glen (talk) 18:51, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
I was working on a response, but it seems I have talk page stalkers who have done so for me as well. My reasoning for issuing the block falls along the lines of Mz7's explanation, that and the username suggests it is promotional, that it represents the organization, and implies shared use. The lack of egregious promotional editing in the user's contributions, however, was why the soft block was specifically used instead of a hard block, which would have been a gross biting of a new user in my eyes. That being said, I want to thank you for reaching out - I am certainly not close-minded to the opinions of others :) . Red Phoenix talk 19:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Red Phoenix Official

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

User:Red Phoenix Official? Maybe a coincidence? Jerm (talk) 17:11, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

@Jerm: I’d say that’s probably the case. I would have suggested attempted impersonation, but I checked the user’s Contribs and it’s not in areas I edit, so idk. It’s definitely not me; I don’t run any alternate accounts. Red Phoenix talk 18:20, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Ok, That's what I thought also, but I wouldn't be surprised if another admin assumed impersonation and performed a block. Jerm (talk) 18:38, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Escape Velocity Nova

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Escape Velocity Nova you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Looks like block evasion

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Blocked user Cedille Records (talk · contribs). Or meat puppetry by ChitownJuCat (talk · contribs). Thanks, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 04:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

I issued Cedille Records a soft block, which actually allows him to create a new account because the username was the primary reason for the block. He declared the connection at the article talk page, and so far there hasn't been too bad of COI issues. I'll make sure to issue a welcome-col template to ChitownJuCat, but we should actually be okay for the moment. I'll keep an eye on their edits. Red Phoenix talk 11:28, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Got it. Thank you. If there's no discernible COI content we can remove the template. Cheers, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Perhaps a userblock

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Please. Overt123456713131 (talk · contribs). Much appreciated, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:34, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Took care of it. The vandalism at the draft talk of the vandalism draft was done after the final warning, so that'll do it. I would just be careful if I were you on the disagreement you and this user had at the disambiguation page - those reversions likely would not have passed WP:NOT3RR and both of you broke it. Of course, his block for vandalism squares that away, but be mindful of what is vandalism and what isn't, even by a vandal. Red Phoenix talk 02:41, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Understood. In such instances I'm willing to take that risk; the first few edits I attribute to a new and likely juvenile editor. After that, continuing to add a non notable against policy without engaging is pretty clearly disruptive. Thanks again, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:48, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank You, RP.

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Red Phoenix,

Over the course of my time here on Wikipedia, no user has ever inspired me more than you. You have countless articles that have been featured and recognized as some of the best, you are still active on the site to this day, and you have even stayed chill in pretty heated times. People like me that grow up on Wikipedia and watch others inspire them throughout the time that they are active on here. You had so many supporters for the admin nomination, it was unbelievable (about 200+)! I hope you won't stop creating good articles and monitoring the evil, dirty, and disgusting vandals in this website.

Thanks, luke loves editing (chat) 18:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

P.S. Can you help me throughout my journey on Wikipedia? I kind of need it right now.
@LukeLovesEditing: Thank you! Where can I help you on your Wikipedia journey right now? What kinds of goals do you have, and what can I do for you to help you reach those goals? Red Phoenix talk 19:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
I recently had to get an article out of deletion (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Louis_Armstrong%27s_All_Time_Greatest_Hits) and I need to get it updated and functional. Someone said it looked more as a promotional article without a lot of sources cited. Also, my goals include getting at least 1 "good" article on the website, getting a featured article on the website, and getting at least 1,000 edits. luke loves editing (chat) 12:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

@LukeLovesEditing: I've read over your draft, and I know where you need to begin. Let's start with notability - the core of whether or not a subject actually needs an article or not. Whenever you're looking to establish whether a work of intellectual property is notable (books, music, movies, video games, and the like), what will establish the notability is, in at least 90% of cases, the critical reception. How much have people who have an influence in the industry commented on it? So, for an album like this, none of the ratings on Amazon, Discogs, or eBay are relevant. User ratings people posted online don't count for anything. What counts? Opinions from professional critics or are influential in the industry. Articles about the subject by reputable people or publishing companies with editorial oversight are good, too.

For a music article like this, examples of notability-conferring coverage might come from:

  • Magazines, such as Billboard, Rolling Stone, Cashbox, or any other major music magazine publication. You might be able to find some available to read online in the texts section of the Internet Archive.
  • Company websites from said magazines, as well as from news agencies such as the BBC, CNN, etc. Check the publisher of websites and make sure your story isn't by a non-staff member who just wrote something for a website one day.
  • WP:JAZZ#Possible sources might be helpful as well.

I'm not truly a music editor, though, so I might contact a WikiProject or I'd also recommend Ritchie333 as someone who knows much more about music articles and sourcing than I do. That being said: I hate being the bearer of bad news, but compilation albums rarely get articles. Why? They usually don't have coverage of themselves critically. That Louis Armstrong is notable himself does not necessarily mean a compilation article of his works is notable, as notability is not inherited. The master key is this: Always base your articles on the sources you find first, not the other way around.

On promotional tone - WP:TONE would help here. Phrases such as "Many people enjoyed this album as most of the critical reception was great. As you'll see below, there were good sales and many positive reviews surrounding this album." are immediate red flags. How can you say the critical reception was great, and how do you define great? You can say it received positive reviews, but we've already discussed what "critical reception" needs to be. "As you'll see below" is also a red flag as not encyclopedic tone, and again, "good sales" and "many positive reviews" are subjective terms. That's what makes it sound promotional - keep the tone objective.

  • There is no specific set of sales, but it had a good reputation within the jazz community. The song most likely had a few hundred thousand sales, but we cannot tell since there is no website that specifically tells us how many sales there are. - That is original research, and is not allowed. If it can't be sourced, don't speculate on it. Briefly, I'll share with you some advice I received in my first year here in 2008: Treat Wikipedia like you're writing a paper at school. Cite your sources, don't plagiarize, and state the facts and be explicit when you're quoting someone's opinion.

Hopefully that will be a good start. I would start with finding some new sources first on your draft, and see if an article could be made from it. I can evaluate any sources you want if you want me to have a look. Put in some research, let me know how it goes, and how I can help you next. Red Phoenix talk 18:56, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Super Monaco GP

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Super Monaco GP you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Namcokid47 -- Namcokid47 (talk) 05:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  Thanks for dealing with this Pakistani obsessed vandal! Here's some coffee for you. Go-Tsumaroki (chat) 14:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Sign my User-Page?

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey Red,

I just started a new section of my user-page (not talk page) where you can sign my user-page (kind of like an autograph book). It would be an honor to have you as my first person to sign it (excluding me, who already signed it Lol). If you don't want to, that's okay, I just wanted to do something fun around here.

ありがとう,   Go-Tsumaroki   22:31, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

P.S. If you are wondering what "ありがとう" means, it roughly translates to "Thank you."

October 2020 GAN drive!

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

-- Eddie891 Talk Work 12:36, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Escape Velocity Nova

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article Escape Velocity Nova you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Escape Velocity Nova for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 20:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Escape Velocity Nova

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article Escape Velocity Nova you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Escape Velocity Nova for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 20:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  Ajpolino • LuK3
  Jackmcbarn
  Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
  There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  The Admin's Barnstar
For your work to clear the backlogs at AIV, UAA, and RFPP. Best, Mifter (talk) 02:49, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Video games Newsletter Q3 2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 3 — 3rd Quarter, 2020
  Previous issue | Index | Next issue  

Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2020, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered ~~~~~)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Possible block evasion

Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I see you blocked User:119.235.251.172 for vandalism -- thanks for that. I think the user may be evading the block, given the edit and edit summaries of these two edits, which both edits insert the word "The" before the subject name on Early modern warfare.

User:119.235.251.172: edit on 13:24, 21 August 2020 with edit summary ending ... to an encyclopaedia you must be descriptive or else
User:185.157.232.78: edit on 09:15, 9 October 2020 with edit summary ending ... to an encyclopaedia you must be descriptive or else!

This new editor has just repeated their edit while I've been composing this, so this is ongoing.

What do you recommend? --A D Monroe III(talk) 18:35, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

@A D Monroe III: It's probably the same editor, though it may not necessarily be "evasion" if the user is on a dynamic IP address. That being said, the edits are stale now that I'm getting to this, so I'd just report to AIV if they're evading the block. Being blocked means you shouldn't get to continue to edit if your IP changes, but with dynamic IPs, it needs to be a quick response to have any effect, otherwise when the user comes online they'll have a different IP each time. I'm not an admin who's around all the time, so just go to AIV if it happens again. Red Phoenix talk 00:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Harris & Klebold article

Latest comment: 4 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

As you did the GA review, I am curious of your opinion here. Should not anything salvageable from that article be put on the article for the massacre? That's the reason anybody cares to know their name. Most of the article is just copy-paste from there. Frankly, I would say anybody who knows anything about the case knows the purpose of that needless additional page for the perpetrators is because of the anti-hero worship surrounding them. It's on par with having an article arguing for OJ's innocence rather than incorporating that into the article on the trial (in fact, copied from that article), with additional trivial pursuit facts about his childhood by endearing fans. Or giving Adam Lanza a page. Cake (talk) 19:45, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

@MisterCake: It is honestly a lot of duplication. Some of it may be warranted only if that "anti-hero worship", as you describe it, has significant coverage it itself. To make an example from one of your suggestions, has Adam Lanza inspired others to commit similar crimes like the Sandy Hook massacre and been noted as an inspiration to some? Possibly, but probably not many. Have Harris and Klebold? Maybe, if only because Columbine was one of the first events to really gain such notoriety as a mass shooting in the modern history of the United States, and there have been "inspirations". But, I'm certainly not advocating that this article should be existing. As I will admit it's out of my range of subject expertise, since I don't normally do modern event and history articles, what I would suggest is get a larger section of the community involved. Either an RFC or an AFD would do, though on an AFD it wouldn't hurt to suggest merging whatever useful content there might be, as you're likely to get a lot of "Merge" !votes. An RFC might get a more in-depth look, while AFDs will get more comments and really a less-detailed dig into the subject. Red Phoenix talk 00:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Appreciate the response, with some of the red tape on (potential) AfD, and interesting take on copycats. By my reckoning Columbine has more copycats than any crime there is. Hence the Columbine effect article, and a separate article on Harris and Klebold strikes me as particularly unwise; and the way e. g. Sandy Hook, Parkland, Thurston High, Dunblane, Luby's, San Ysidro, Hungerford, Westroads Mall shooting, Eaton Township Weis Markets, etc etc (Mitchell Johnson and Andrew Golden should be changed to Westside School Shooting) cover the perpetrator as but a part of the crime giving them infamy, with whatever media coverage was about them, as much wiser, and in this particular case as the one most needing to be aware of that. How many other perpetrators will you find childhood pictures of? Note how much I had to delete from their 'personalities' that was not in the sources cited. If "antihero worship" is too blunt, then to use the term the article uses; it's the superfluous "Columbiner" article. Cake (talk) 17:28, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
@MisterCake: It's worthy noting that this isn't the only article quite like this; for instance, Seung-Hui Cho and Virginia Tech shooting. So, it's not as though the precedent doesn't exist, but I'm unsure if the subject as a whole has ever been discussed, much less just Harris and Klebold. It's entirely possible that the RFC route to start a conversation on the topic may be the way to go, as it might actually affect multiple articles. Red Phoenix talk 19:06, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Will have to take a look at a few RFC's one day to get a feel for them. Again appreciate it. Also have to wonder if the precedent for Cho's article was the Harris and Klebold article in the first place. Cake (talk) 19:56, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Precious
 
Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:34, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you today for Sonic X-treme, introduced: "Sonic X-treme is more than a canceled video game for the Sega Saturn - it's also in many ways a cautionary tale of corporate politics and the effects they have on a company. It's a captivating story of game development, I believe, whether you are a video game fan or not."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:00, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Super Monaco GP

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article Super Monaco GP you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Super Monaco GP for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Namcokid47 -- Namcokid47 (talk) 19:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2020

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

WikiCup 2020 November newsletter

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is   Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by   Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points.   The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with   Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.

The other finalists were   Hog Farm (submissions),   HaEr48 (submissions),   Harrias (submissions) and   Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!

All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.

Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2020

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).

 

  Administrator changes

  Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020

  Interface administrator changes

  Izno

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

2.89.35.17

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Can user:2.89.35.17 please be blocked ASAP for vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 13:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

@CLCStudent: Done. Red Phoenix talk 13:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Sega Test

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Did you see this? [1] You'd probably score high easy. TarkusABtalk/contrib 11:27, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

I had not seen that. Wow. Not sure if I'll find the time but I'd love to take a crack at it. Red Phoenix talk 12:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

In appreciation

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  The Reviewers Award
By the authority vested in me by myself it gives me great pleasure to present you with this barnstar in recognition of the thorough, detailed and actionable review you are carrying out on Sonic the Hedgehog for FAC. This work is much appreciated. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:46, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

 

Hello Red Phoenix,

 

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
 
 
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

ygm

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
 
Hello, Red Phoenix. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Schazjmd (talk) 01:32, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Never mind, Acroterion took care of it. Schazjmd (talk) 01:41, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
@Schazjmd: No worries. Glad you took the time to reach out to me. Red Phoenix talk 02:53, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Boy I tell ya

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This year has been too long that I forgot you are an admin now. I had to make sure I voted for you to remember that. What a year. GamerPro64 04:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Sure has been a hell of a year. Oh well, at least it’s nearly over. Red Phoenix talk 11:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Have a Happy Holidays!

 

CaptainGalaxy is wishing you a Merry Christmas (quite possibly a White Christmas).



Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.


Spread the Christmas spirit by adding {{subst:User:Matty.007/template/Christmas}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message. If everyone who got this put it on two talk pages, we would have... lots of Christmas spirit! Have fun finding links in this message!

— 16:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 
 
 
Red Phoenix,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! Le Panini [🥪] 23:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year!

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 
 
 
 
Red Phoenix,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! CaptainGalaxy 00:16, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

CSDs of pages previously surviving AfDs

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

this is entirely incorrect. CSDs are not subject to IAR except in the most exceptional cases, and WP:G11 is not listed at Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#Pages that have survived deletion discussions. Even assuming for the sake of argument that you were correct in characterizing a page that had survived its most recent AfD as purely promotional, administrators are not free to bypass speedy deletion criteria at will. For you to have doubled down when I pointed this out is inappropriate and not consistent with good administrator conduct. Even if your statement was just intended as hyperbole, it's both unnecessary to the discussion in which it was posted, and paints your willingness to apply CSD properly in a poor light. Such cavalier disregard for process--again, even just in a statement without actual misuse--can be a sign of admin burnout, which is a terrible thing that the encyclopedia can ill afford. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 08:11, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

@Jclemens: I will concede that I could have put it more eloquently, and I’m happy to clarify that no, I wouldn’t actually use CSD if an article weren’t eligible. That should have been obvious, though - notice I didn’t !vote Speedy Delete? That being said, you missed the whole point of the argument - this article has G11 criteria written all over it, and instead of arguing the article, you are arguing the process. That’s called wikilawyering, and suggesting I have burnout is casting aspersions. If I didn’t have any respect for the process, I would have just deleted it, or !voted Speedy Delete if I didn’t want to overreach. But you ignored that. I doubled down to make the point to you because you chose to argue back on process, not content. It is a perfectly valid delete !vote that makes valid points, and yes, if nine years ago had it not somehow survived a deletion discussion I would !vote to delete as a G11 speedy or conducted the deletion if someone else tagged it first. Again, maybe could have been more eloquent and clear with my choice of words that no, I wouldn’t actually delete it via CSD if it was not eligible. However, that doesn’t change my !vote nor invalidate my points. I am willing to discuss the article if you’re willing to talk about the article - on the deletion page. And I’m willing to reconsider my !vote if you can show me secondary sources and we can gut all the advertising out. Red Phoenix talk 18:21, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick help!

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey, thanks for the quick help with that [insert pejorative here] that was vandalizing Ronald McDonald (and all those other pages)! Happy New Year! — UncleBubba ( T @ C ) 03:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2020

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 12, No. 4 — 4th Quarter, 2020
  Previous issue | Index | Next issue  

Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2020, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC))

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Offensive comment at Talk:Black Lives Matter

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Thanks for taking swift action to hide the offensive comment at Talk:Black Lives Matter. Just FYI the offensive edit summary / username are still visible in the talk page history because they appear in SineBot's subsequent edit summary. Maybe hide that too? Best, Generalrelative (talk) 04:21, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Working on them, thanks. There were a lot of the edits themselves to do, and now I'm trying to go back and get all the reversions. Red Phoenix talk 04:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Got it. Much appreciated! Generalrelative (talk) 04:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Recreating Deleted page

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Red Phoenix, thank you for the prompt response on 03:10 4 February 2021, for the deleted page Draft:MILDEF International Technologies. I am not paid in any way for the content creation, so it is fine if I recreate the page to not include any unambiguous advertising or promotion for the organization? MQ Consultant (talk) 06:50, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

@MQ Consultant: Feel free to recreate it if you'd like, but I highly recommend you read WP:SPAM, as well as articles on similar subjects to ensure that the next attempt doesn't read like a press release. A good way to do this might be to start with your research first, using reliable sources, and write your article from there. Red Phoenix talk 12:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

The Road to Paradise

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Can user:The Road to Paradise please be blocked ASAP. CLCStudent (talk) 21:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Looks like Ponyo beat me to it :) Red Phoenix talk 21:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Blocking NathanQuessy6969

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi

I saw you blocked NathanQuessy6969 (talk · contribs). You might want to also look at NathanQuessy69 (talk · contribs). Knuthove (talk) 01:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Addressed. Thank you. Red Phoenix talk 02:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Blocking Tokyointernationalschool

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi

I saw you blocked Tokyointernationalschool (talk · contribs). You might want to also look at Tokyointernationalschool5484 (talk · contribs).--Renat 01:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Good article backlog drive in March

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In order to receive notifications about future drives, sign up for the Good articles newsletter.

(t · c) buidhe 04:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Promotional username

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi

AFDAMarketingDept (talk · contribs) = AFDA, The School for the Creative Economy --Renat 23:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

@RenatUK: I’ve got it. Just so you know, I’m not always around because of my schedule outside of Wikipedia. Much as it backlogs often, and I fight that backlog, I would make sure you report to WP:UAA with these, and if you do choose to reach out to me, report there as well in case I can’t get to it sooner. Oftentimes I’ll just have a couple of minutes for Wikipedia here and there. Red Phoenix talk 01:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Okay. Thanks.--Renat 01:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  TJMSmith
  Boing! said Zebedee • Hiberniantears • Lear's Fool • Only • WGFinley

  Interface administrator changes

  AmandaNP

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
  • When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
  • There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 March newsletter

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:

  •   Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
  •   Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
  •   ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
  •   Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
  •   Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
  •   The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
  •   Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
  •   Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
  •   Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
  •   Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Some new Sega info

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hey Red! Not sure if you knew about this, but parts of a Japanese oral history with former Sega employee Masaharu Yoshii (who's credited as the director of Sonic 2) from last year has been translated and an excerpt about Sonic 2 and STI has been posted on Sonic Retro. There's some great info, but I wanted to let you know that Yoshii mentions that Mark Cerny actually quit halfway through Sonic 2's development (not at the end) and Yoshii temporarily ran STI until a replacement was found, which the STI article doesn't mention. JOEBRO64 15:31, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

@TheJoebro64: Awesome, thanks! That's not something I recall seeing Cerny mention in his conversations. I'll have to find time to parse it soon; activity's been a little slow since we have a new baby in my house and that's consuming a lot of time. I'll try to take a crack at it soon. Red Phoenix talk 02:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Oh wow, congratulations! So happy for you. JOEBRO64 13:33, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
The guy who posted it let me know that the relevant material is on pp. 13-16 of section 2-2 and pp. 20-21 of section 2-1, just so you know. JOEBRO64 00:41, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS

  Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

  Technical news

  • When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
  • Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 13, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2021
  Previous issue | Index | Next issue  

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2021, the project has:

Content

Project Navigation
To opt-out or sign up to receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to update the distribution list.
(Delivered 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC))

-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 May newsletter

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:

  •   The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
  •   Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
  •   Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
  •   Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
  •   Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
  •   Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
  •   Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
  •   Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Remember me! Helen Pickett Wiki submission

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi there Red Phoenix ... I hope you are well. I finally have the revised version of Helen Pickett's Wiki submission. If you would be so gracious, may you please look it over for me and let me know if this version is ok to post? I would be so grateful. Thank you so very much. Be well. Jackiespina777 (talk) 22:17, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Jackiespina777

Red Phoenix I tried to find where it says to email you and was unsuccessful. I apologize that I am so unskilled at the WikiLanguage. If it's possible, may I please email this to you. It wouldn't let me send it through here. Something to do with an external link or something and I don't know how to fix it. UGH, asking for help again! Jackiespina777 (talk) 22:17, 3 May 2021 (UTC)Jackiespina777

@Jackiespina777: I'll try to take a look at it as soon as I can; some things have come up in real life and it may take me a bit of time to get to. Try creating your version at User:Jackiespina777/sandbox, which is your sandbox page, and I can view it from there. It's also a great place that you could practice your wiki code. Red Phoenix talk 03:13, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  Enchanter • Carlossuarez46

  Interface administrator changes

  Ragesoss

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  Ashleyyoursmile • Less Unless
  Husond • MattWade • MJCdetroit • Carioca • Vague Rant • Kingboyk • Thunderboltz • Gwen Gale • AniMate • SlimVirgin (deceased)

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:46, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Still hoping you can help

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi RedPhoenix it’s Jackie Spina needing help with Helen Pickett’s page again. I am at a loss as to how to enter the content with the hyperlinks included. And if you’re still willing, I would really love it if you may please take a look at the content I’d sent you before. If you can’t find it, I can try to resend. It would be so much easier if we could please correspond through email just until we get things going. If you are up for this, I will happily give you my email and we can go from there. I just really, really need help. Thank you so much. I hope I’ve done all this correctly. Jackiespina777 (talk) 20:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)jackiespina

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
 
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
  • This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.

Click here to opt out of any future messages.

--Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 July newsletter

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:

  •   The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
  •   Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
  •   Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
  •   Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
  •   Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
  •   BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
  • An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.

  Technical news

  • IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

  Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Arbitration case opened

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Iranian_politics. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Iranian_politics/Evidence. Please add your evidence by August 6, 2021, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Iranian_politics/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 18:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.

  Technical news

  • Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:18, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

RE: Soma Games page

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hey Red Phoenix! :) It's been over a full year, and I have dilligently and patiently waited exactly as you asked for people to edit the Soma Games page so we can remove the peacock words and instances of informal tone, and hopefully see people start adding new information after that. Unfortunately, after more than 12 months, we still have had nobody find the article organically, nor have had almost anybody help to edit it. I have promoted the article on the Video games Wikiproject three times over the past year as you suggested, but unfortunately those received nearly no replies and only resulted in one edit over the year.

I've continued to monitor the page and resist editing any of it, but after waiting for more than 12 months under our original strategy, I am wondering if you think a new approach may be necessary and helpful for this page? Taking a long break from improving the page has definitely helped me to identify instances of unencyclopedic tone throughout the article, and to more fully recognize the overuse of primary sources. I've got lots of info or even just small tidbits that I would love to add to the article which are coming from exclusively third-party sources. There are even just small updates that would keep the page's information current instead of having its content stuck in the past. Let me know if you think we should re-evaluate our strategy for getting the page improved and updated.

Thanks so much! Hope you are doing well! 😃 Emitewiki2 (talk) 19:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

@Emitewiki2: That is disappointing to hear, that no one has picked it up. Tell you what, since it’s been a year I should have some fresh eyes, so I’ll be glad to help you out personally. I just ask that you be patient with me only that I’m not quite as active as I was due to some life changes, but I will help as I can. I’ll have a look within the next few days and I’ll look forward to hearing input from you at Talk:Soma Games. Red Phoenix talk 20:16, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Great, will do! And don't worry if you're not super speedy with changes and responses. I, too, have a busy real life so I'm only able to get around to these passion projects when I have time. Usually it's fairly sporadic so if you don't hear from me on the talk page in the next few days, just keep waiting and I'll get to it eventually as well :P. Emitewiki2 (talk) Emitewiki2 (talk) 19:47, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants,   The Rambling Man and   Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being   Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are   Gog the Mild,   Lee Vilenski,   BennyOnTheLoose,   Amakuru and   Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles.   Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  Jake Wartenberg
  Emperor • Viridian Bovary
  Ashleyyoursmile → Viridian Bovary

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:46, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed decision posted at the open Iranian politics case

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the open Iranian politics arbitration case, the proposed decision has now been posted. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. You were notified as you made comments in the case request. For the Arbitration Committee, Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 01:49, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

 
 
New Page Review queue September 2021

Hello Red Phoenix,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

 

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2021

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  Arbitration

  • A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
  • Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
  • The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.

  Miscellaneous

  • Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
  • The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Red_Phoenix/Archive_6&oldid=1064010853"