{{adoptoffer}}


I am interested in editing text editing software pages.--Red Summer Rain (talk) 23:18, 12 March 2009 (UTC)Reply




Welcome

edit
Hello, Red Summer Rain! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Killiondude (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


Feedback

edit
I saw your post on WP:FEED and I just wanted to know that I'm going to get to it today if possible! Based on your contributions, it looks like you've been editing for a few months, but I guess its "better late than never" as far as welcoming you. :-)

Regards, Killiondude (talk) 22:29, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've given you some feedback on WP:FEED for the article you requested feedback for. Regards, Killiondude (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Added notes here so I don't forget when my request gets archived!

edit

I've made substantial additions to the EmEditor page, could you please make some comments about content citations, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability. I'm most concerned about having enough/proper references. Thanks! Red Summer Rain (talk) 20:25, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Whoa. So from the page's history is looks like it has been in existence for 3 years (almost to the day), largely untouched until you spruced it up. The first thing that should be done with the page is that more independent, third party sources to show that it is notable enough to meet the criteria for a Wikipedia article. Somebody put a notable tag on the article a few years ago, but an IP rewrote the article and removed the tag (not addressing the issue). If notability isn't proven, then the article has a chance of being deleted. After notability is taken care of, you can probably focus on the following:

"EmEditor" is the starting word of a lot of sentences. In fact, it is stated many times throughout the article. You can probably substitute "the software" or something similar in many places so that it is a smoother read and less repetitious. The lead section is pretty choppy. Try combining sentences (make compound sentences) and give a little more of a summary of the article. See WP:LEAD for more info. Similarly, you might wanna combine short paragraphs (one or two sentences) into longer paragraphs. You might want to check out this guide to see if it could help in any way (I've never extensively edited software-related articles, so this might help you more as far as what content you could add). You also might wanna check out this tool that helps citie things (when you're finding sources show notability). Hope that helps. If you have any further questions you can ask here, or on my talk page. Killiondude (talk) 23:55, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Adoption

edit

Hello, Summer. You seem to be a promising pupil whom I am interested in teaching at my school. If you're interested please contact me at my talk page. Hope to see you soon! T-95 (talk) 04:09, 29 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Red Summer Rain. You have new messages at Tarheel95's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

T-95 (talk) 20:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply