Cover deletions

edit

Those covers might be fair use. That's not the issue. WP:FU is very clear on this. "Here are a few examples of uses that would almost certainly not be acceptable as fair use: ...... 7. An image of a magazine cover, used only to illustrate the article on the person whose photograph is on the cover. However, if that magazine issue itself is notable enough to be a topic within the article, then fair use may apply." The fair use image tag attached to almost everyone of these covers is even more restrictive. I'm deleting covers under this rule, but I'm flexible, if the text of the article mentions the magazine I leave the cover in. Other people working on fair use problems remove covers I'd leave in. Since you're a law student, you also know I hope that using magazine covers means using magazine logos which means using magazine trademarks. That makes fair use even harder. Jimbo says "But an ordinary photo of a random celebrity? We are much better off to have no photo than to have a fair use or even "wikipedia only" photo." If you look at the talk pages related to WP:FU there's lots of discussion and my removals are relatively conservative. Bottom line: OK as fair use on WP doesn't always mean OK as fair use in GFDL-republication of WP material. And that's important. The editor soon to be formerly known as Harmonica Wolfowitz 19:19, 5 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

New image project

edit

Hi. This little form letter is just a courtesy notice to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images, Wikipedia:WikiProject Fair use, Wikipedia:WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Conversation about redirecting those projects is located here. Please participate in that discussion if you have any interest, and if you still have interest in achieving the goals of the original project, we'd love to have you join in. If you aren't interested in either the conversation or the project, please pardon the interruption. :) Thanks. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum

edit

Hi Redkern,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

  • Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
  • It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
  • Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.
  • I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.
2. If you're a law student,
(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)
3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 04:21, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply