Redvers is male gay married a socialist a vegetarian Welsh an atheist • and we'll let you know

01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

Don't post your images to Commons. Why not?
DON'T post "talkback" templates. I'm already watchlisting your talk page
Watchlist this page to see replies


Protected edit request on 6 September 2019

Please replace entire content with the following:

#REDIRECT [[Help:Your first article]]

{{Rcat shell|
{{R to help namespace}}
}}

This is to fix a double redirect, as the target has moved. (Even though the editor is inactive, this page has numerous existing links to it.) Wdchk (talk) 02:11, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Not done however @Wdchk: I've reduced the protection level and you may edit it directly. — xaosflux Talk 11:38, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
  Done: Thank you for reducing the protection level. Once this was done, a bot was able to fix the double redirect. Then I added the rcat. (This thread applies to the subpage User:Redvers/New Users.) Wdchk (talk) 18:59, 7 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Inglés" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inglés. Since you had some involvement with the Inglés redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. —Yours sincerely, Soumyabrata (talksubpages) 14:45, 10 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Eric Syddique

 

The article Eric Syddique has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOL having only been elected at a local level. References do not speak to WP:GNG criteria of significant coverage about the individual.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bondegezou (talk) 15:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox military memorial

 Template:Infobox military memorial has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox monument. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 13:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Beachcomber (TV series)

 

The article The Beachcomber (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not seem to meet the notability guidelines. Sources that would give this potential to be notable cannot be located.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. aaronneallucas (talk) 03:44, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Beachcomber (TV series) for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Beachcomber (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Beachcomber (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

aaronneallucas (talk) 18:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply