User talk:Renamed user 3738539gjcwjnsw/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Renamed user 3738539gjcwjnsw. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Copyright problems with Image:Wolfwere2.jpg
Copyright problems with Image:Otherfull 06.jpg
Talk page vandalism
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Chris Cunningham 11:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Sangiovanni
Sangiovanni has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant concerns. An example of notability guidelines can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (websites). If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.
If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 15:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
Jesse Mulkey
Are you User:Jesse Mulkey? If you are, please post confirmation with that account. Thanks! Powers 20:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks! Powers 21:01, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
That article wouldn't be understood to anyone who hasn't played the game from beginning to end. I'm saying this to you because I saw that you're the one who started the article and thought you'd probably be interested in improving it. Please read my message in the article's talk page and respond there. Thanks, Tamuz (Talk) 13:48, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:Pgp 005 01.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pgp 005 01.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Muchness 08:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- The following images you uploaded also have no source details: Image:Pgp 011 01.jpg, Image:Pgp 007 01.jpg --Muchness 08:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Copyright problems with Image:88137.jpg
Muchness 08:34, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- The following images you uploaded are also possible copyright violations: Image:MonFaePG89.jpg, Image:33558.jpg --Muchness 08:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Planescape: Torment Merger
Why did you merge Planescape: Torment, List of characters in Planescape: Torment and The Nameless One (making Planescape: Torment extremely long)? That kind of drastic changes need to be passed in a vote - where there such a vote? I, for one, believe it was better as it was earlier, and didn't get to vote against the change. (And, as there was no link in the merged articles to the discussion, neither did the rest of the editors) --Yuval Madar 15:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- The discussion you wish to find has been moved here: Talk:Planescape: Torment/Archive 2. The consensus (i.e. everyone) was that the pages should be merged, even though that would make the final page unfeasibly long. Go figure. --Zenosaga 21:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- There was no concensus for merging them into Planescape: Torment. What I suggested is that both the List of Characters and the Nameless One articles should be deleted, because they seemed pretty much redundant to me. I agree that some information should have been moved from them into the main Planescape: Torment article, but I don't think they should have been wholly merged. If any of you feels like it, it would be appreciated if you summerize and shorten these (merged) sections. Tamuz (Talk) 09:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- I am against the deletion of these articles. I believe the nameless one article should be merged into the list of characters, though. Yuval Madar 13:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
- There was no concensus for merging them into Planescape: Torment. What I suggested is that both the List of Characters and the Nameless One articles should be deleted, because they seemed pretty much redundant to me. I agree that some information should have been moved from them into the main Planescape: Torment article, but I don't think they should have been wholly merged. If any of you feels like it, it would be appreciated if you summerize and shorten these (merged) sections. Tamuz (Talk) 09:23, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:MBLogo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:MBLogo.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
May I ask what you're trying to accomplish with these templates? I find that they have extremely limited use (only 2 or 3 pages) and they make it difficult for editors to change information in them. Axem Titanium 01:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Technically, the templates allow uniformity on the Trinity Blood pages (if you edit one the edit appears on all the pages, not just one), and they are quite easy to edit actually. Template:Trinity Blood External links has an [edit] button on all pages it appears on, and I just added a view/talk/edit button to Template:Trinity Blood. These are meant to allow uniformity and ease of use, for the betterment of all. --Zenosaga 09:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- But in the end, does it really matter if one page has a link that another doesn't? Also, since the anime and the manga seem to be radically different things, sometimes a link may be applicable to one while not to the other. The same reasoning goes for the Template:Trinity Blood. The manga page doesn't need to have the infobox for the anime or the novel and vice versa. The point is, I don't think the ability to place the same thing on only three pages justifies the need for a template. I hope you understand where I'm coming from. Axem Titanium 21:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- There is such a small number of external links related to the topic that it would be simpler to have them all in one place, for easier editing and such. And the Template:Trinity Blood infobox has information related to both the anime, manga, and novel, and doesn't belong on only one if it has information relating to all three. You could try to have all three of them merged, if you wanted to, since that would solve all the [trivial] problems you cited. Oh, and there is currently no page dedicated to the manga.--Zenosaga 23:15, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
- I really don't feel like it's necessary to have this kind of uniformity. At any rate, I'm moving them to TfD to let everyone else decide. You can voice your opinion there. Axem Titanium 22:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
- But in the end, does it really matter if one page has a link that another doesn't? Also, since the anime and the manga seem to be radically different things, sometimes a link may be applicable to one while not to the other. The same reasoning goes for the Template:Trinity Blood. The manga page doesn't need to have the infobox for the anime or the novel and vice versa. The point is, I don't think the ability to place the same thing on only three pages justifies the need for a template. I hope you understand where I'm coming from. Axem Titanium 21:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Planes.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Planes.png. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.
Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 23:39, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Template:Trinity Blood again
Please do not recreate recently deleted content. You have recreated a page exactly as it was before it was deleted per the discussion here. I have tagged it for speedy deletion. Please do not recreate it again. Axem Titanium 20:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Both pages use the same template in their code, and it would be easier to update if they both used the same external template, and it can be easily edited with the added navbar. Please understand that the template makes things much easier for editors. The only way I can see that would make the template unneeded would be to merge the pages it is used on. --Zenosaga 20:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- That's not the point. The point is that it is a misuse of templates and that there is consensus to delete them. Axem Titanium 21:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- So is the consensus of the idiotic masses more important than the credentials of an intellectual? Oh, and the template no longer is to be worried about, as I merged the pages to make it unneeded. Tata! --Zenosaga 21:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- That's not the point. The point is that it is a misuse of templates and that there is consensus to delete them. Axem Titanium 21:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)