User talk:Renamed user 39825094askdfja/Archive 1

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Abequinn14, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! zziccardi (talk) 23:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

• From the editor: If only if

• Op-ed: The last leg of the Admin Ship's current cruise

• Opinion: Wrestling with Wikipedia reality

• News and notes: Another newspaper for Wikipedia; Wikimania 2018 ends; changes at NPR

• In the media: Blackouts in Europe; Wikipedia and capitalists; WMF Jet Set

• Discussion report: Wikipedias take action against EU copyright proposal, plus new user right proposals

• Featured content: Wikipedia's best content in images and prose

• Arbitration report: Status quo processes retained in two disputes

• Traffic report: Soccer, football, call it what you like – that and summer movies leave room for little else

• Technology report: New bots, new prefs

• Gallery: Independence days, national holidays, and football – all in July

• Blog: Motivation of two editors

• Recent research: Different Wikipedias use different images; editing contests more successful than edit-a-thons

• Humour: It's all the same

• Essay: Wikipedia does not need you

• From the archives: The pending changes fiasco: how an attempt to answer one question turned into a quagmire

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:50, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to WP:STiki!

Hello, Abequinn14, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Information about STiki, including: Using STiki and its hotkeys Comparison with other tools Information about vandalism on Wikipedia Here are some pages which are a little more fun: The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users! Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes! We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 10:24, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: Having a username change after you start using STiki will reset your classification count. Please let us know about such changes on the talk page page to avoid confusion in issuing milestone awards. You can also request for your previous STiki contributions to be reassigned to your new account name.

Rollback granted

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. - TNT ^💖 18:25, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Huggle edit summaries

Hi. I noticed that your Huggle-based reverts only have the summary "(HG) (3.4.3)" without the usual "reverted edits by ..." bit at the beginning. It's not a big deal, but you should probably fix that before you make hundreds of edits. Thanks, Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

How do I do an automatic summary? Abequinn14 (talk) 20:53, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

I don't use Huggle — I just assumed that the "reverted edits by..." summary was the default setting and you changed something unintentionally. If not, maybe the answer is somewhere in mw:Manual:Huggle/Configuration. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 21:04, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

AIV

I just realized I did it...I had no feedback I did. I've restored it; definitely wasn't meant to be reverted (I was going over my watchlist and must have clicked rollback without realizing it). Very sorry. Nate • (chatter) 00:59, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

It's fine. Abequinn14 (talk) 01:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Great job reverting vandalism. Keep it up! ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 12:06, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll try my best. Abequinn14 (talk) 18:15, 13 August 2018 (UTC)

Sarah Jeong survey

Thank you for your considered closing of the survey, which I saw only now. Regarding this request, the article does not really need to be updated given that the consensus was found to be for option 2, since the article's current contents already reflect that option's wording (with some minor grammatical fixes, tweaks etc that were non-controversial or independently gained consensus). Nevertheless, the formal closing of the survey was important in order to establish that the current version of the article does have consensus. So thanks for taking the time. Abecedare (talk) 19:16, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the note, and thanks for the thanks. Abequinn14 (talk) 19:17, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

While I have fixed the wording in the sections containing reviews to avoid too much repetition, I suspect any FA reviewer will want some more work done consolidating these sections. I refer you to this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyediting_reception_sections which may help you with this.

Good luck with the FA process.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:04, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Swarm ♠ 03:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)