Let's do this " templates " thing

Speedy deletion nomination of Argayu's forest

edit

Hello Renewcim1415,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Argayu's forest for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 20:33, 12 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of La Loja's cave

edit
 

The article La Loja's cave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, not really worth the effort of trying to improve it. If there's notability here, probably best to start from scratch.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Michig (talk) 21:29, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply