Respected young doctor
February 2022
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers was changed by Respected young doctor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.905712 on 2022-02-26T04:25:12+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Girls Just Want to Have Fun. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Girls Just Want to Have Fun was changed by Respected young doctor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953891 on 2022-02-26T15:18:19+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nora, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 16:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to McDonald's legal cases. Serols (talk) 16:23, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello yamla. I understand you are the best wikipedia mob so I am wondering if you may stand up against this discrimination and stand on my side! They misunderstood and blocked me when they shouldn't have. I believe in you to get me unblocked!
Hello Yamla. I understand you are the best Wikipedia mob so I am wondering if you may stand up against this discrimination and stand on my side. They misunderstood and blocked me when they shouldn’t have. I believe in you to get me unblocked! Respected young doctor (talk) 02:18, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Discrimination on Wikipedia
editI am very concerned on the ways that Wikipedia administrators handle vandalism. They use harsh and hurtful language towards you and sometimes go as far as to discriminate against you for being a woman. I support women in STEM and I think Wikipedia should too. I would like to point out one specific very harmful administrator named Serols who used words that I will not say and blocked me for being a woman. I think this situation should be addressed as soon as possible to prevent a toxic reputation for Wikipedia. Respected young doctor (talk) 02:24, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en
wikimedia.org with your username and appeal.Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).