Respecteveryone
May 2011
editWelcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from 2011 Fuzhou bombings. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You appear to be involved in an edit war and have been blanking pages. Please stop. RxS (talk) 06:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Admin noticeboard
editHello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2011 Fuzhou bombings. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.
In particular, the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Marcus Qwertyus 06:27, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Based on a request at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Conflict.2FPossible_Sockpuppet_at_Chinaman, a sockpuppet investigation has been begun at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dwarm12345 μηδείς (talk) 18:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)