ReversePorkies

2009 December

Your edits to “Phi Kappa Psi” ([1] [2]), removing the allegation of sexual assault, are vandalism. The marking of the second edit as minor was unacceptable. The use of the account ReversePorkies to circumvent the block of Personperson1234567 is a violation of Wikipedia policy against such use of sock- and meat-puppet accounts. —SlamDiego_←T 03:45, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Not the same person, he's a friend who told me about your abuse of this article. Please read the actual report before continuing to block edits. Your blocking is incorrect.

That would make you a meat-puppet, and the violation stands. Meanwhile, I have read the actual report in the Wildcat. —SlamDiego_←T 03:54, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Nonetheless, if you read the article you realize a) there is not a police blotter report mentioned b) the article is misleading and needs to be clarified that it was done by an unknown person. It is considered libel and slander http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libel aka defamation to continue to allow this. Furthermore, the fact that the section is included on one fraternity page and not others is not equal treatment of subject matters.

I suggest that you stop playing lawyer, as a true claim is never libel, even if it might be better written (and nothing written is slander). Your continued attempts to eraser the report of sexual assault are utterly disingenuous. Your argument about other fraternities was long-ago exploded at the article talk page and during a formal mediation, and more recently on the talk page for User:Personperson1234567. I am now merely waiting for you to be identified and blocked as a vandal before reverting your latest act of vandalism. —SlamDiego_←T 04:13, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 04:32, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Now indefinitely blocked as a sock puppet

I have extended this account's block to indefinite as it is clear that this account is being used as a sock puppet to gain the upper hand in the editing of the Phi Kappa Psi article. MuZemike 19:08, 6 December 2009 (UTC)