Rezvee Khan

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Rezvee Khan! Thank you for your contributions. I am Babymissfortune and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Marc (talk) 10:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pocket Cube has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pocket Cube was changed by Rezvee Khan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.883901 on 2015-12-23T08:26:25+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:26, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Rezvee Khan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rezvee Khan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 21:04, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Recent edit to RAJUK Uttara Model College

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 18:15, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kissanime.me

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kissanime.me requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - INVISIBLE^knock! 15:04, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello,long time no see.

It is to mention that you are only editing anime matters please do some edits of other subjects. Hajera Sultana Bushra (talk) 01:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Reception sections

Scores are irrelevant and are not acceptable when describing the reception of a work. Instead summarize what the reviewer says in the review. Also, name the specific reviewer as a site can have more than one review by different reviewers all with different opinions. And lastly, per WP:BURDEN you must cite the review, especially since you will be quoting the review and all quotes must be sourced. —Farix (t | c) 16:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)