Rglovejoy

Welcome!

Hello, Rglovejoy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! SoothingR 06:49, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Photo change

You are right about the Photo being to large and the pixellated look of the photo on the Hiromi Oshima page. I will try and resize the photo with in the infobox. Thanks for helping with this page. hope to add more photos to this page soon Max 00:19, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

Ola Ray

Hi, thanks for your edits on the Ola Ray article. I've made numerous changes to the filmography that you supplied so that the film titles would be in italics and also linked to their articles. I just thought I'd mention it so that if you work on other actor/actress's filmographies you can standardize the format so that the links work and all that. Thanks, Dismas|^(talk) 21:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

Magazine titles

Hello, I noticed that you've been doing quite a bit of work on articles for Playboy Playmates and such. I thought I should mention to you that according to the Manual of style, magazine titles should be in italics. Therefore it should be Playboy instead of Playboy when referring to the magazine itself. I noticed you removed the italics from one article, now I'm curious just how often you've done this. One of the things I fix most often is italics for magazine, television show, album, movie, book, and play titles. If you could start putting those things in italics, that would help a lot. Double quotes are used for names of songs and individual episodes of a television show, for example "Stairway to Heaven" or "Gourmet Night". Thanks! Dismas|^(talk) 02:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:196205 Marya Carter 00.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:196205 Marya Carter 00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Dakota ~ ° 05:20, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:197003 Chris Koren 00.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:197003 Chris Koren 00.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 01:26, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:196106 Heidi Becker 00.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:196106 Heidi Becker 00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. feydey 19:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:196107 Sheralee Conners 00.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:196107 Sheralee Conners 00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. feydey 20:28, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:197106 Lieko English 02.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:197106 Lieko English 02.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. feydey 00:24, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:197003 Chris Koren 00.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:197003 Chris Koren 00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 19:06, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:196206 Merissa Mathes 03.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:196206 Merissa Mathes 03.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 17:26, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:196202 Cover.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:196202 Cover.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. TheProject 17:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:196107 Sheralee Conners 00.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:196107 Sheralee Conners 00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Image Tagging Image:197003 Chris Koren 00.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:197003 Chris Koren 00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Image Tagging Image:196412 Jo Collins 00.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:196412 Jo Collins 00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. TheProject 00:32, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:196508 Cover.jpg)

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:196508 Cover.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that your image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If your image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why your image was deleted. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

In addition, I have removed the following images from their articles as fair use violations, which has caused them to become orphaned: Image:196405 Cover.jpg, Image:196404 Cover.jpg, Image:195612 Cover.jpg, Image:195412 Cover.jpg, Image:196708 Cover.jpg, Image:196812 Cover.jpg, Image:196906 Cover.jpg, Image:198306 Cover.jpg. These will be deleted within seven days if appropriate fair uses cannot be found for them. Thanks. TheProject 00:32, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:196503_Jennifer_Jackson_00.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:196503_Jennifer_Jackson_00.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:195807 Linne Nanette Ahlstrand 00.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:195807 Linne Nanette Ahlstrand 00.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 23:43, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:196802 Nancy Harwood 07.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:196802 Nancy Harwood 07.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:04, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Infobox Scientist

Please can you vote at [1] to try to reach a consensus for shortening this infobox a little.bunix 18:43, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Request for Comment

Your comments at [2] would be greatly appreciated. Best regards, bunix 03:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Slaclogo.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Slaclogo.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Logo Fever

Dear Lovejoy, I'm very impressed with the work you are doing on science biographies and making the infoboxes look really colorful. However, I'm worried that putting logos of all the institutions might be a little overboard. Personally, I think it is fun and don't mind it myself...however there are other editors on this Wikipedia who get very precious if things start looking a little aesthetically unbalanced. If their ire is raised, they may make trouble. It would be wise if you put an example template on this page: [3]. and start a discussion to try to get consensus on whether people like your university logos in the template or not. Please also carefully read this page, because we have reached a consensus on which fields to fill in and which not. I notice you are not upto date on the discussion there. Please also feel free to contribute to the discussions and weigh-in your opinion to add weight to consentual opinion. Wiki-world business is all done via consensus, so your weigh-in counts. Best regards, bunix 12:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

• Using logos in infoboxes is not a fair use, see WP:FUC and WP:LOGOS. --Peta 04:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Explain to me how inclusion of the logos in the infoboxes meets any of the criteria for fair use. They are just being used for decoration in the infobox - which is not a fair use.--Peta 05:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
    • And a logo in the infobox does none of those things.--Peta 05:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Vannevar Bush: Provost of MIT

You added http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vannevar_Bush&diff=prev&oldid=78532030 The exact nature of the assertion, and who it was being made by or when is sklightly less than clear, and I wonder if since you presumably have the book which is a reference there you might be able to improve it. Looking at the WP article on the man in question, he seems to have been treasured by MIT (and I'm not clear that Wiener wasn't). I appreciate that American associate professor is more like English lecturer, but is it so very obvious that someone is anti-semitic if one recent PhD is not appointed to one post? The organisation of universities may be different now than it was then, but I suspect that other members of the department might be involved in appointment ctees, and that policy on appointments may not be a matter entirely for one person. ould you care to consider whether that addition makes sense, whether it is relevant, whether it is adequately made out to be true, and whether it is in fact notable? Midgley 16:13, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Who did Bush hire, in that job? And in what way was Bush less involved in his being hired (presumably) later in the year when he joined the faculty? That could usefully be added. Does MIT, or did MIT in fact make hiring decisions by one person deciding even then? It doesn't sound to me like how a university conducts its business. "No excuse not to appint him" is overstated, I could without any great diffciulty think of six, including having already decided to appoint him to a different post about to appear. Midgley 16:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

You may wish to reconsider an assertion that MIT had a Provost in 1937 (http://libraries.mit.edu/archives/mithistory/histories-offices/provost.html ) since they report inventing it in 1949, and I continue to think that claiming someone who was appointed to teh faculty in 1937 according to WP was not appointed due to anti-semitism, even if they are actually two separate specific posts, is of a level of reliability that fits our Daily Mail, if that, rather than a serious publication. If I say a fact needs checking, just removing the tag is at least sub-optimal. Midgley 16:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

As a student at MIT, could you drop in to the administration and ask to see the source material, please? What posts did Levinson apply for and when, who sat on the appointment panel or considereded each of them. I'm a bit further away. Midgley 16:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Manson Benedict.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Manson Benedict.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Roscoe G. Dickinson

Hi Lovejoy! Nice job, I like your pages. I notice you are a bit of a guru on biographies of ex-MIT people. Please can you check out this page I just started on: Roscoe G. Dickinson. I was wondering if you have access to info that could help expand this biography a little? Keep up your good work! SureFire 21:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Infobox

Trying to reach an infobox consensus here: [4]. Please can you weigh-in with your opinion? SureFire 00:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Image:197808 Vicki Witt.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:197808 Vicki Witt.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rossrs 21:47, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Templates

Thanks for working with the {{playmate}} template by adding it to articles. While bouncing around the articles I noticed that you put in a {{playmates of 1978}} template. Nice work on that. Are you going to be doing the rest of the years as well? Just curious, Dismas|^(talk) 04:05, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Birth date and age template

I was wondering if you might add your thoughts to the talk page atTemplate talk:Infobox Playboy Playmate in regards to the birth date and age template. Thanks, Dismas|^(talk) 03:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Image request

I have noticed that you have uploaded quite a few images of Playboy playmates. Will it be possible for you to upload an image of Jayne Mansfield from her first Playboy pictorial, and link it to the article on her? - Aditya Kabir 14:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:195807 Linne Nanette Ahlstrand 00.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:195807 Linne Nanette Ahlstrand 00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 21:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:195808 Myrna Weber 04.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:195808 Myrna Weber 04.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 21:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:195812 Joyce Nizzari 00.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:195812 Joyce Nizzari 00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 21:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:195905 Cindy Fuller 01.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:195905 Cindy Fuller 01.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 21:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:195908 Clayre Peters 14.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:195908 Clayre Peters 14.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 21:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:195909 Marianne Gaba 00.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:195909 Marianne Gaba 00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 21:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:195910 Elaine Reynolds 00.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:195910 Elaine Reynolds 00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 21:33, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Playmate Navigation Template

Those were not attempts at vandalism. I started switching them to "autocollapse" and realized that the "collapsed" view actually looked better on individual pages, so I reverted them back to the "collapsed" state, that's all. I have been making changes to the templates for the past few days, trying to make them less intrusive to the articles. Not attempts to vandalize. Sorry if I didn't make it clear. 65.213.44.9 22:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

I found it a little ironic that the person who created the first Playmate navigation template which inspired me to make them a little better ultimately reverted my efforts in trying to make them collapsible and look better (less intrusive) in individual Playmate articles. (Just forgot to put in descriptions on my edits, I guess) With the recent events with fair use image warring and all, I am a little bit disheartened by this place and I think I'll take a break. Not trying for a personal attack here and I do thank you for your vigilence (not being sarcastic here), as wikipedia certainly needs it more than ever these days. You have my utmost respect. 65.213.44.9 23:42, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

An Odd Question

I noticed personally that you knew quite a bit of information about Vicki Peters. How were you able to collect this information. I went to school with her and just thought it would be interesting to know what ever happened to her. For some reason my computer is being weird, so if you could post your reply on my talk page that'd be great. Thanks.Bobpalloona 04:13, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Bobpalloona

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Jayne_Mansfield_headshot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Jayne_Mansfield_headshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:195908 Clayre Peters 14.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:195908 Clayre Peters 14.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. There are also a whole bunch of other ones that you uploaded to show us the faces of Playboy posers. I won't be listing them all here, as there are too many, but take a look at my contributions to see the list. Alternatively, you can have a look at them here. The same procedure as listed above is required for all. Normally, when a person is living, a free image can be obtained. Thank you. Bob 08:52, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Playboy

I like the table of deceased playmates, do you mind if I add a safety copy to your account? It looks like it will be deleted. User:Rglovejoy/Dead Playboy Playmates

Image:Cc PP 195403 Dolores Del Monte 31 Marketplace.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cc PP 195403 Dolores Del Monte 31 Marketplace.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob 02:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:199007 Jacqueline Sheen 00.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:199007 Jacqueline Sheen 00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob 15:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Millie Dresselhaus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Millie Dresselhaus.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 48 hours after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Another image in this situation is Image:JD Jackson.jpg Bob 15:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:195909 Marianne Gaba 00.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:195909 Marianne Gaba 00.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bob 04:16, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Jan Roberts

Hello,

The information in this article you wrote about a year ago seems to be taken entirely from a single playboy issue. As such I do not believe it qualifies as biography and have marked it for deletion. Please do not hesitate to remove my tag if you have other reliable sources of information on this person, or have other reason to think it can be salvaged. Regards, --Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri 18:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

• I regret that I have also tagged the article on Mickey Winters, as I have almost identical concerns. Regards, --Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri 19:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Never mind

• Heh. The tags have been removed, and things have been kindly explained to me... Carry on, --Abu-Fool Danyal ibn Amir al-Makhiri 17:27, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for adding to Jacqueline Barton article!

Hi Rglovejoy, I appreciate the work you've done to add to the Jacqueline Barton article. I am an undergraduate at Caltech, and I enjoy learning more about my professors. Thanks! --mikexstudios 06:18, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Villars-statphys.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Villars-statphys.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Vernon Ingram.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Vernon Ingram.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:14, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Slaclogo.gif

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Slaclogo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Optigan13 (talk) 07:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

I've also noticed on http://www-group.slac.stanford.edu/com/logo_files.htm that the logos in use now are different from the one you uploaded. -Optigan13 (talk) 07:55, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Rglovejoy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 39 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 58 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Shay Knuth - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Kai Brendlinger - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Astrid Schulz - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Melba Ogle - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Barbara Hillary - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Jessica St. George - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Melodye Prentiss - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Majken Haugedal - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Dru Hart - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Elizabeth Jordan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Neva Gilbert

The article Neva Gilbert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for Pornographic actors and models. In addition, this is an unsourced biography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Terry Ryan (model)

The article Terry Ryan (model) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for Pornographic actors and models. In addition, this is an unsourced biography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Lisa Winters

The article Lisa Winters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:46, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Judy Lee Tomerlin

The article Judy Lee Tomerlin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Myrna Weber

The article Myrna Weber has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cindy Fuller

The article Cindy Fuller has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:50, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clayre Peters

The article Clayre Peters has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:50, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elaine Reynolds

The article Elaine Reynolds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:50, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ellen Stratton

The article Ellen Stratton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 04:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nancy Scott (model)

The article Nancy Scott (model) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and doesn't appear to meet WP:PORNBIO notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EuroPride (talk) 18:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Heather Ryan (model)

The article Heather Ryan (model) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet WP:PORNBIO guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EuroPride (talk) 18:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Britt Fredriksen

The article Britt Fredriksen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet WP:PORNBIO guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EuroPride (talk) 18:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sheralee Conners

The article Sheralee Conners has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Being a Playboy Playmate is not enough to meet the new notability criteria for pornographic actors and models.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NW (Talk) 18:38, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nancy Harwood

The article Nancy Harwood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet WP:PORNBIO notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EuroPride (talk) 19:09, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Janet Pilgrim (model)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Janet Pilgrim (model). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Pilgrim (model). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dolores Del Monte

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Dolores Del Monte. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dolores Del Monte. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Monique St. Pierre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monique St. Pierre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monique St. Pierre until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 00:59, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Pamela Saunders for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pamela Saunders is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Saunders until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 00:59, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Liz Glazowski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liz Glazowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liz Glazowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens.rf 02:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

MEGAFORCE

The movie is now out on DVD. The original soundtrack has also been released through BSX Records. 99.139.201.54 (talk) 11:27, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Elizabeth Jordan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Jordan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Jordan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fasttimes68 (talk) 05:38, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Melodye Prentiss for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melodye Prentiss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melodye Prentiss until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fasttimes68 (talk) 05:44, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Gale Olson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gale Olson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gale Olson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fasttimes68 (talk) 05:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Majken Haugedal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Majken Haugedal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majken Haugedal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fasttimes68 (talk) 05:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Neva Gilbert for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neva Gilbert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neva Gilbert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fasttimes68 (talk) 05:57, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Neriah Davis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neriah Davis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neriah Davis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 00:03, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Playboy Playmates by birthplace for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Playboy Playmates by birthplace is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Playboy Playmates by birthplace until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Playboy Playmates by birthplace for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Playboy Playmates by birthplace is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Playboy Playmates by birthplace (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:08, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Carol Eden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carol Eden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Eden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

gnu57 19:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Delores Wells for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delores Wells is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delores Wells until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

damiens.rf 06:04, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Neva Gilbert for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neva Gilbert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neva Gilbert (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

damiens.rf 06:10, 12 June 2022 (UTC)