April 2023

edit

  Please refrain from hijacking pages as you did with Daniel Kraus. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Also see Wikipedia's disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Miner Editor (talk) 01:41, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Daniel Kraus has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Daniel Kraus. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Kraus (rabbi) has been accepted

edit
 
Daniel Kraus (rabbi), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Daniel Kraus (rabbi)

edit
 

The article Daniel Kraus (rabbi) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, with all sources being self-written or official webpages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 01:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, unfortunately I am only seeing this deletion notice now. What are the steps I need to take to reinstate this page and address the issues which saw it deleted? Thank you. Rhiannon1991 (talk) 13:51, 6 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Kraus (July 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by S0091 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The vast majority of sources are primary and/or not independent so cannot be used to establish notability. See also Daniel Kraus (rabbi).
S0091 (talk) 16:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Rhiannon1991! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 16:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Rhiannon1991. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 16:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Daniel Kraus

edit

  Hello, Rhiannon1991. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel Kraus, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 5 December 2023 (UTC)Reply