A Belated Welcome!

edit
 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Richard.decal. I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  7  06:39, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Greetings from the MCB WikiProject!

edit
 

Hello, Richard.decal, welcome to the Molecular and Cellular Biology WikiProject!

I noticed you recently added yourself to our Participants' list, and I wanted to welcome you to our project. Here are some ideas on how you can help::

Read our Manual of Style, guide to citing sources and try this citation tool

Join in editing our collaboration of the month

Have a look at some related projects and resources

Improve articles on our worklist


If you have any questions, comments or suggestions, don't hesitate to post on the project talk page, or please drop me a note on my talk page.

Again, welcome!

Tim Vickers (talk) 16:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

Autosomal recessive juvenile Parkinson disease

edit

Hi Richard, I nearly proposed your new page for speedy deletion until I realised from your other contributions that you are a biologist and a serious contributor to the encyclopedia. Have you considered preparing your articles first in your sandbox? By doing so, you will be posting reasonably complete new articles, complete with all their page elements and references, and avoiding the risk of deletion by new page patrollers who do not do background checks. If you need any help on creating new pages, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page.--Kudpung (talk) 06:24, 22 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I have never created a new stub before and didn't know there was a minimum amount of info needed. I will make the stub in my sandbox and post it to the encyclopedia when it's ready. Thanks for the advice! richard.decal (talk) 04:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

trouble with new references section

edit

{{help me}} I added the first ref to the Josh Tickell article and made a new references section, but half the article is hidden and a big error shows up. I can't seem to make it go away, what did I do wrong? Richard☺Decal (talk) 09:58, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Richard. Most markup tags tag in computer languages that work by an opening tag followed by a closing tag use forward slashes, not backslashes. You wrote <ref>citation<\ref> rather than </ref>.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 10:12, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
D'oh! Thanks for the help. Richard☺Decal (talk) 01:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

reporting a vandal

edit

I am looking for someone to double check if I reported a vandal correctly. User_talk:207.74.27.71 is a repeat vandal, so I followed the instructions on Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism... did I do it right, or am I expected to do more? Thanks Richard☺Decal (talk) 21:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Looks fine, and it also appears the vandal has been blocked as a result of your block. Thanks for the report! --joe deckertalk to me 21:47, 10 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit article "Cold Fusion" Nine Refefences to Pathological Science Should Be Moved to Historical Footnotes

edit

To improve the article:

1) Wiki needs to view it as science.

2) Wiki needs to recognize which scientific journals are utilized and sourced by scientists in this field of physics.

I predict a tremendous increase in the readability of the article.

Query to the scientific community: To the Directors of Physics Departments,

LENR - Low Energy Nuclear Reaction and Widom Larson Theory, aka Condensed Matter Nuclear or Lattice Enabled Nuclear; historically misnamed "Cold Fusion"

1) Is this science or pathological science?

2) Do you offer a class in this discipline? If so, please provide information.

3) Are you developing a curriculum of this science? If so, when will you offer it?

4) What peer review journals do you utilize or source in this field?

Richard sir, P>S> 1) Any suggestions or criticisms before I move forward with this? 2) Is this direction of query able to yield opinions the Wikipedia forum on Cold Fusion may value? Thank you for your time, Gregory Goble gbgoble@gmail.com (415) 724-6702--Gregory Goble (talk) 00:49, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Too much detail in Stellerator article

edit

Thanks for your comment on my talk page, User:Richard.decal. (Did you receive notification of my reply there? Not familiar with this Wiki-technicality.) I don't feel strongly about this, but I have two comments. This wasn't just "a" single experiment, but a (long-delayed) major milestone on a 20-year billion-$ project. On the other hand, this detail illustrates to at least those with some technical background that it was a very cautious and limited first step, to avoid a perception of hype. Layzeeboi (talk) 03:05, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I didn't get an email notification for your original reply. I've replied now :) Richard☺Decal (talk) 06:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Richard.decal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Regeneration (ecology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to editathon at ISMB/ECCB 2017

edit

ISCB Wikipedia Competition: call for participation

edit

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Richard.decal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sia (technology) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sia (technology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sia (technology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kb.au (talk) 00:01, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

ISCB Wikipedia Competition 2018: entries open!

edit

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: entries open!

edit

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Richard.decal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: a reminder

edit

8th ISCB Wikipedia Competition: entries closing soon!

edit

8th ISCB Wikipedia competition: deadline extended!

edit

Mikhail Lebedev

edit

We urgently need a Wikipedia article on the famous neuroscientist, Mikhail Lebedev. Can you please finish the article on Mikhail Lebedev this weekend? It needs to be nominated as a good or featured article within 30 days. I Already started. Please see Draft:Mikhail Lebedev (neuorscientist). — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talkcontribs) 01:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

basic research methods in neuroscience

edit

hello Richard.decal , I saw that you are part of the neuroscience wikiproject.

i feel that the article titled neuroscience should have another section explaining the common/basic research methods used in neuroscience.

i dont know how to post this in the wiki project becuse its not just simple text.


any help on the matter is appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RJJ4y7 (talkcontribs) 15:15, 1 October 2021 (UTC)Reply