Speedy deletion of Sally Ann Parsons

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Sally Ann Parsons, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. jonny-mt(t)(c) 15:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit

Hello. Concerning your contribution, John Butler (1920 - ), dancer and choreographer, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.nypl.org/research/manuscripts/dance/DanButle.xml. As a copyright violation, John Butler (1920 - ), dancer and choreographer appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. John Butler (1920 - ), dancer and choreographer has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Improbcat 18:02, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Stella Bloch, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.nypl.org/research/manuscripts/dance/danbloch.xml. As a copyright violation, Stella Bloch appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Stella Bloch has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Stella Bloch and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Stella Bloch with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Stella Bloch.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Improbcat 18:05, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Philip Sterling, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://catnyp.nypl.org/search?/tphilip+sterling/tphilip+sterling/1,1,1,B/l856~b8811998&FF=tphilip+sterling&1,1,,1,0/startreferer//search/tphilip+sterling/tphilip+sterling/1,1,1,B/frameset&FF=tphilip+sterling&1,1,/endreferer/. As a copyright violation, Philip Sterling appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Philip Sterling has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Philip Sterling and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Philip Sterling with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Philip Sterling.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Improbcat 18:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Ballet International, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://catnyp.nypl.org/search?/tballet+international/tballet+international/1,12,14,B/l856~b7929814&FF=tballet+international+records+1915-1952&1,1,,1,0/. As a copyright violation, Ballet International appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ballet International has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ballet International and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ballet International with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ballet International.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Improbcat 18:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Cynthia Auerbach, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://catnyp.nypl.org/search?/tcynthia+auerbach/tcynthia+auerbach/1,2,2,B/l856~b8457597&FF=tcynthia+auerbach+papers+1968-1986&1,1,,1,0/. As a copyright violation, Cynthia Auerbach appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Cynthia Auerbach has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Cynthia Auerbach and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Cynthia Auerbach with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Cynthia Auerbach.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Improbcat 18:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your recent contributions

edit

While we appreciate your attempts to contribute to wikipedia, the material you have been contributing is all copyrighted by the library you copied it from. As such we can not have it on wikipedia. I strongly encourage you to rewrite the material in your own words and contribute that to wikipedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a comment on my talk page. Improbcat 18:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Chamberlain and Lyman Brown

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Chamberlain and Lyman Brown, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion G12.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 18:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


edit

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Eye on Dance (TV), we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://catnyp.nypl.org/search?/teye+on+dance+records/teye+on+dance+records/1,1,1,B/l856~b8275857&FF=teye+on+dance+records&1,1,,1,0/indexsort=-/startreferer//search/teye+on+dance+records/teye+on+dance+records/1,1,1,B/frameset&FF=teye+on+dance+records&1,1,/endreferer/. As a copyright violation, Eye on Dance (TV) appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Eye on Dance (TV) has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Eye on Dance (TV) and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Eye on Dance (TV) with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Eye on Dance (TV).

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Improbcat 18:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply