Rightooth

Orphaned non-free image File:The Sager Group Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Sager Group Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Roderick D. McKenzie

Hello, Rightooth,

Thanks for creating Roderick D. McKenzie! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 20:12, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Roderick D. McKenzie moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Roderick D. McKenzie, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. QueerEcofeminist ^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 10:42, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Roderick D. McKenzie has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Roderick D. McKenzie. Thanks! AugusteBlanqui (talk) 13:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roderick D. McKenzie has been accepted

Roderick D. McKenzie, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

AugusteBlanqui (talk) 13:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Tim Kelly (American businessman) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Kelly (American businessman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Kelly (American businessman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 22:32, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Walt Harrington

Hello, Rightooth,

Thank you for creating Walt Harrington.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Your article on Walt Harrington contains no references at all, so it has not established the notability of its subject. It is probably possible to find references like book reviews etc which establish his notability, but unless that is done the article will probably be deleted.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|PopePompus}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PopePompus (talk) 23:31, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello Rightooth. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rightooth. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rightooth|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bilby (talk) 23:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Bibly. I am not being compensated for my edits. Rightooth (talk) 05:17, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I always have this issue with the templated messages, in that they seem to suggest some room for doubt. Paid editing isn't easy whether it is under the terms of use or not, but you will need to make a choice as to whether or not to disclose. Ultimately it is your choice, but if you continue to engage in paid editing without meeting the terms of use your account will end up blocked. - Bilby (talk) 13:09, 17 September 2022 (UTC)