License tagging for Image:Southgate-sign.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Southgate-sign.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:09, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Southland.JPG

edit
 
Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Southland.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 10:35, 27 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pamela Franklin

edit

Are you sure her post-1976 filmography refers to a different actress, or is it just an outright hoax? PatGallacher (talk) 16:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I had assumed that someone simply made a mistake, but after your suggestion of a possible deliberate hoax, I looked up on IMDB a few of the movies in the erroneous post-1976 filmography. (The ones I looked up on IMDB were "Cliffhanger" (1993), "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" (2005), "Bride Wars," and "High School Musical 3.") As I wrote on the Pamela Franklin discussion page, neither an actress named "Pamela Franklin" nor the name of her supposed character (e.g., "Veruca" in Bride Wars; "Mrs. Teavee" in Charlie & The Chocolate Factory, etc.) appeared in the IMDB credits for those films. So, it looks to me now like a fabricated filmography, not an honest error. Rimes (talk) 02:53, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Reply