Your recent edits

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

April 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Ray of Light. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. And you thought nobody will notice your vandalism eh? IB [ Poke ] 09:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

IndianBio when you wrote "and you thought nobody will notice your vandalism eh?" I really didn't mean to vandalize at all. I was just trying to take care of bare URLs as were laid out on the Wikipedia:Cleanup#2015_posts -- I don't mean to post anything about Adele. I was just using the WYSIWYG tool to change bare URLs into proper Citations and I even remember putting in the UPenn/NYU PDF article. You did the right thing but I was surely not vandalizing. I am sorry you believed that to be the case. I always recommend "assume good intent." I am new here so I am trying to follow the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle method. Sorry if I pissed you off.

American and British etc spellings

edit

While welcoming your contributions to wikipedia in general, I have noticed that many of your edits feature changing British English to American English for no specific reason. I'd suggest you check Wikipedia:FAQ which outlines the wikipedia approach to spelling, and also the manual of style which discusses in more detail the reasons for changing and article or not. Batternut (talk) 23:08, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

I will stop that. I am just getting the hang of this. I will cease and desist these changes. I do not have an Americanocentric agenda. I am just getting a hang of it. Thank you for your assistance. Rimsroot (talk) 20:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
And I thank you too, for entering the fray. I count myself as a beginner too, so welcome to the club! Batternut (talk) 10:34, 15 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
Cheers, I really appreciate that, Batternut Rimsroot (talk) 20:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

List of women innovators and inventors by country

edit

  Hello. Your recent edit to List of women innovators and inventors by country appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 12:42, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, MasterCraft, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:43, 24 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

August 2019

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ST47 (talk) 16:05, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jackie Baumgarten for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackie Baumgarten is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackie Baumgarten until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 05:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply