Hello. How is it that you clain the note you removed from binomial distribution is redundant? I don't see it elsewhere in that paragraph. (My more cynical tendencies cause me to suspect that you could have mistaken the part about np ≥ 5 and n(1 − p) ≥ 5 for something relevant to the continuity correction, although it is a different thing altogether.) Michael Hardy 21:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
Oh, OK, it is there. I think I'm going to expand it, though. Michael Hardy 21:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)