Rjr1960

Welcome!

Hello, Rjr1960, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Battle of Belmont. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BusterD (talk) 12:57, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Original research at the Camp Douglas article & addition of text contradicted by the source

Please read WP:NOR. I removed a paragraph what seems based on your own understanding of the situation - our articles need to directly reflect our sources, not draw deductions from them.

You also added text to a reference changing "Due mainly to the efforts of the prison physician," "Due mainly to being an officer's prison with much better facilities and the efforts of the prison physician," - your text is not in the source and is contradicted by the source which comments on " the lack of healthy meals, the lack of heat, and the developing unsanitary conditions of the camp." Doug Weller talk 11:58, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Camp Douglas (Chicago). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You're adding text to a reference which is there only to back the text it references. It isn't actually part of the body of the article. You're adding text in a way that makes it appear that it is on those pages in those sources. Please stop. Find sources that back what you say and add new text to the actual article, not the reference text, Doug Weller talk 12:25, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ulysses S. Grant. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

You deleted sourced text and added unsourced, but elsewhere you removed text saying it was unsourced - so it appears that you already know you shouldn't add unsourced text. Doug Weller talk 16:40, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

Andersonville National Historic Site

I am not sure where I am supposed to give fair warning that I am going to change this but these words on the wikipedia page at the Andersonville National Historic Site saying the prisoner exchanges for that POW camp were "caused by the Confederacy's refusal to include blacks in the exchanges..." is simply not historically accurate and the source cited never says that. I can explain, if needed, how this sentence may fit on a page discussing the stoppage of prisoner exchange that took place in May or July 1863 but when the exchanges for Andersonville was in progress Grant halted that in Aug. 1864 and was very clear why he halted those. He never mentioned anything about African American soldiers.

Again, the source cited (with no page number given) does not say anything like Pres. Grant's halting the exchange process was "caused by the Confederacy's refusal to include blacks in the exchanges...". This is simply not historically accurate and cannot be backed up by a source.

If the correspondence regarding exchanges of May and July 1863, in which the fact that African Americans were not recognized as U. S. soldiers by the President of the Confederate States is discussed then the other several reasons also need to be discussed at the same time. This is going to need to be spelled out correctly, with viable sources.

Rjr1960 (talk) 05:55, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

You need to put this at Talk:Andersonville National Historic Site. As I have said in replying to you on my talk page, article talk pages are the place to discuss changes you want to make in an article that might be disputed. Doug Weller talk 13:28, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Rjr1960. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pointe Coupee Artillery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deer Creek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:04, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

DS Alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Jorm (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)