I appreciate your willingness to be bold, but we already have an article on Superconductivity. If you find something there that hasn't been covered, please do so. Thank you! :) -- Grunt (talk) 15:01, 2004 Jul 2 (UTC)
I agree the arctle on super conductivity (most people would think two words) is excellent, but is excessive for the reader with only casual background in the sciences. I believe my article is also correct, but would not intigrate well into the super conductivity article, which does not cover most of the points I made. I got to super conductors by clicking go in the search engine. IMHO shorter articles are appropriate under both superconductor and super conductors
Cross references are desirable, but not easy without errors such as no article at the link. Neil
Start a discussion with Rncox
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Rncox. What you say here will be public for others to see.
