Robbymcd

Regarding Hydroxychloroquine, in the "adverse effects" section, please add this latest publication from Oxford University Press, Journal of Public Health.

"HyPE study: hydroxychloroquine prophylaxis-related adverse events’ analysis among healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic: a rising public health concern" link - https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/advance-article/doi/10.1093/pubmed/fdaa074/5850534?searchresult=1

This study was conducted among health care workers in India, who were taking Hydroxychloroquine for prophylaxis against COVID-19.

It showed an increased no of gastrointestinal side effects. Although cardiac adverse events were nonserious in nature. The study group hypothesized that the increased side effects may be due to these factors : "In our study, a relatively higher incidence of side-effects was found in comparison with other studies which involved patients with connective tissue disorders, on prolonged hydroxychloroquine maintenance therapy. Even though the reason remains elusive, one can probably argue that the study subjects here were apparently asymptomatic, in contrary to the common scenario where patients with rheumatological conditions suffering from a myriad of distressing symptoms take this drug along with multiple others. This perhaps exerts a masking effect on the adverse effects caused by hydroxychloroquine per se. The symptomatic relief obtained from the therapeutic effect of the drug in such cases seems to outweigh the adverse symptoms caused by it in an overwhelming majority of cases. The other way to interpret the probable cause of this is the added component of panic engulfing a significant proportion of frontline personnel as they face the challenging task of managing patients, and at the same time, seeing fellow healthcare workers succumbing to the same disease they have been entrusted to treat. In addition, there is a confounding factor of a comparatively wider knowledge base about the drug, which probably enhances the interpretation of symptoms resulting in a broader array of adverse events." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmmsamim (talk • contribs)

This is a primary study, we try to summarize review papers. You can suggest additions of new review articles over at the article's talk page. – Thjarkur (talk) 20:51, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Hydroxychloroquine and zinc

Also refuted at this article's talk page and here. An opinion article without a WP:MEDASSESS review is insufficient support for the content you want to add. Also, do not edit war, WP:WAR, but try for consensus on the talk page, WP:CON. Experienced medical editors are unlikely to agree with you on this topic. Zefr (talk) 19:21, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hi Robbymcd! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Capewearer (talk) 15:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hydroxychloroquine, you may be blocked from editing. Zefr (talk) 00:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Warning

Warnings are not tit-for-tat, Robbymcd. Please immediately cease abusing the the template. Note that you may come under a topic ban from the COVID-19 topic area, broadly construed (per WP:GS/COVID19), if your edits are deemed to be a problem. El_C 13:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Also, don't enter disputes on a user's page, as you did on mine here; see WP:TALKNO. Keep the conversation about hydroxychloroquine on its own talk page, where I have provided enough information for other editors to participate. One editor is not responsible for all content and sources in the article. Zefr (talk) 16:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Moved the conversation to the talk page as per Wikipedia instructions for a dispute. You have not responded to my comments there. talk

Robbymcd, Got your massage. Also i saw your argument on the talk pages which is essentially the same as mines. As you are aware i have been barred from discussing this topic on Wiki, but dont expect to get serious answers on why some "lousy" studies are reported and others deleted, it will be just sand in your eyes.

Now to the fact that i got a topic ban, i am proud to have that on my record, not long would take for me to be proved right. BTW, i am aware on the risk that someone would interoperate my reply on your talk page as a violation of my topic ban...(yes it could get that bad) and sanction me for that... Its a risk i am ready to take. Berkshires (talk) 21:32, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

General sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

El_C 13:07, 3 July 2020 (UTC)