Your submission at Articles for creation: Zinc8 Energy Solutions (March 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GeneralPoxter were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
GeneralPoxter (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Roberto Orendain! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GeneralPoxter (talk) 19:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Editing with a possible paid conflict of interest

edit
 

Hello Roberto Orendain. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Roberto Orendain. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Roberto Orendain|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --SamHolt6 (talk) 20:17, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Zinc8 Energy Solutions

edit
 

Hello, Roberto Orendain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zinc8 Energy Solutions".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 09:58, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Roberto Orendain, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Zinc8 Energy Solutions, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Nathan2055talk - contribs 19:02, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello Nathan, I really appreciate your guidance on drafting an Article on Wikipedia. This is my first time doing it! I do work for Zinc8 Energy Solutions. Because of that I have disclosed on my User Page my Conflict of Interest with the the Article I drafted about the company I work for. My intention is not to promote our company on Wikipedia. However, I do think it is important for a company like ours (which is a unique, globally recognized, energy storage technology) to be available for the general public for the sake of information disemmination. If you think my draft seems like an advertising campaign for the company, I'd be more than happy to rewrite it so it sounds more of a neutral information page. I'd kindly ask for your guidance for my future edits on the Article's draft. Thank you for your support, and I look forward to working along with you to push this page forward in the best way possible. Sincerely, Roberto Orendain (talk) 22:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please note that Wikipedia is not for merely disseminating information or merely telling about a company. This is an encyclopedia, where article subjects(companies, in this case) must be shown with significant coverage in independent reliable sources to meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. Wikipedia is not interested in what a company wants to say about itself, only in what others independent of the company have chosen on their own to say about it. "Significant coverage" does not include press releases, staff interviews, announcements of routine business transactions, the company website, or other primary sources. Because of that, company representatives often have great difficulty in writing about their companies here. To be successful, you in essence need to forget everything you know about your company and only write based on the content of independent sources. Most people can't do that. The draft seems to be mostly sourced to press releases and announcements of routine business, not in depth, independent coverage.
Even if you succeed in creating an article about your company, you could not edit it directly once accepted, and would be limited to edit requests on the talk page. Also keep in mind that a Wikipedia article is not necessarily desirable. 331dot (talk) 01:41, 3 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Zinc8 Energy Solutions

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Zinc8 Energy Solutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 06:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply