Robinson Drinkald

Welcome!

Hi Robinson Drinkald! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! RedPanda25 18:51, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your warm welcome Robinson Drinkald (talk) 18:52, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:England national rugby league team coaches has been accepted

Template:England national rugby league team coaches, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Catalans Dragons coaches has been accepted

Catalans Dragons coaches, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Many thanks. It now means that Catalans are now consistent with all the other clubs in Super League Robinson Drinkald (talk) 09:05, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on List of St Helens R.F.C. players

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of St Helens R.F.C. players, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:27, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Canberra Raiders Women players

A tag has been placed on Category:Canberra Raiders Women players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joe Coan (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mach61 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joe Coan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mach61 (talk) 19:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Robinson Drinkald! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mach61 (talk) 19:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Mach61

That's unfortunate. Can you recommend any changes I could make to make this acceptable?

I'll also drop into Teahouse & see what's there Robinson Drinkald (talk) 12:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

William Rawson

Hi - thanks for your recent edit, adding infoboxes into the article. There seems to be a problem with the image which is now duplicated. Is this a glitch in the templates themselves? Daemonickangaroo2018 (talk) 05:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Daemonickangaroo2018,

I think there may be a glitch in the template, because I certainly didn't specify the image parameter twice in module2.

I'll take a look at it again; maybe switch around modules1 & 2, and see what happens. Fortunately I have a background in IT!

cheers Robinson Drinkald (talk) 12:32, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Joe Coan has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joe Coan. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:29, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edwin Octavius Tregelles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Falmouth. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joachim Hayward Stocqueler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camden.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Hull F.C. to Hull FC

The article is clearly Hull F.C., and that also make grammatic sense. Is there any reson I shouldn't revert your changes? Doctorhawkes (talk) 04:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

This is crazy. You've changed hundreds when it's plain to see by your links you know it's wrong. I'm happy to wait a while for you to correct, but then I'll mass revert. Doctorhawkes (talk) 04:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Doctorhawkes

Looked at in isolation it does seem like a crazy & unnecessary change, however, I'm working on a bigger piece to bring the 'List of Hull F.C. players' article up to date (last updated in 2018), and make it consistent with the corresponding lists for the likes of Featherstone, Wakefield, Leeds, St Helens etc, and introduce a Heritage No column. Since 2018 there have been many changes to their squad, with a high turnover of players.

In so doing, working through each entry for Hull players I noticed an inconsistency when referring to Hull F.C., varying between [[Hull F.C.]], or [[Hull F.C.|Hull FC]] or [[Hull FC]], with many articles flip-flopping between these refs within the same article. So my intention is picking one, and being consistent - but it doesn't really matter which one - I chose Hull FC. If you feel that Hull F.C. is better then go ahead, I won't be put out.

I hope this helps

best regards Robinson Drinkald (talk) 08:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

It's not so much that I find Hull F.C. better (though it's obviously grammatically correct and appears on their logo), it's that the place to discuss that would be at the Hull F.C. article. Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Good point, fair enough. I'll cease making those changes & just stick to the Heritage No. addition, and any other valid corrections. Robinson Drinkald (talk) 11:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, could I ask that you don't add heritage numbers to player articles either? I have been removing these as, while they are interesting, they add a lot of clutter to the article lead (as briefly discussed on the RL talk page here). Don't get me wrong, I think it's great you are working on adding them to List of Hull F.C. players, that's a good place to include them. But adding them to every individual player article as well is excessive, in my opinion. J Mo 101 (talk) 09:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

J Mo,

That's a very fair point, so I'll follow your advice. I had (mistakenly) understood that it was a thing to add.

Do you have any issues with me adding a column to the List of... article to include it? (to make Hull FC consistent with the other List of articles etc.) Robinson Drinkald (talk) 10:59, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Great work being so cooperative, mate.Doctorhawkes (talk) 12:41, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

No problem.

Just to pick up on J Mo 101's point concerning Heritage No. in the player articles, is there an option to include Heritage No. in the infobox? Just a thought. If so, then it would need to be by club Robinson Drinkald (talk) 10:01, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

WP:V

Hi. When you add new information to a Wikipedia article, including in an infobox, please cite your source(s). See WP:V for more information. Also, infoboxes are highly contententous (and have been since the dawn of Wikipedia). Please do not add one to an existing article without first opening a discussion on the Talk page to see if there is a consensus to do so. All the best! -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:56, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hubert Flaxman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Purley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Joe Coan

Hello, Robinson Drinkald. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joe Coan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Hi Robinson Drinkald! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 22:51, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Joe Coan

Hello, Robinson Drinkald. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Joe Coan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:35, 14 October 2024 (UTC)