Robotpotato

Welcome!

Hello, Robotpotato! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! S Masters (talk) 05:07, 2 April 2010 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images • create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2010

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Nymf _hideliho! 21:51, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Also, your edit summaries doesn't match the actual changes in the articles. For example, this is hardly fixing a misspelled word. Nymf _hideliho! 21:57, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Everyone Says I Love You. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I do not call such a wholesale removal of text a "fix." You have already been advised about making your edit summaries truthful, now I am telling you again. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 00:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Harvey Keitel, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 00:09, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of Jewish actors. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 00:22, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Superp (talk) 11:25, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Merchant of Venice (unfinished film)

The article The Merchant of Venice (unfinished film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

never finished, orphaned.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Marcus Qwertius (talk) 16:35, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Robert Downey, Jr.. Thank you. Jayjg ^(talk) 01:13, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jean Benguigui

The article Jean Benguigui has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The reference is in a different language, so this BLP is unreferenced.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Endofskull (talk) 04:15, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Categories

Please do not add religious, descent, or ethnic categories to biography articles without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by sourced article content and 2) the individual personally identifies as such. Any such additions are contrary to WP:BLP policy and will be removed. Additional information can be found at WP:EGRS. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 15:41, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Alain Wertheimer. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Michel Benita. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:23, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Jean-Michel Pilc. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:24, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Martial Solal. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:24, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Daniel Lévi. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:26, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Anouk Aimée, you may be blocked from editing. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Michel Boujenah. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:32, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Laurent Fabius. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:40, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits; the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jayjg ^(talk) 21:41, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Jean-Claude Grumberg, Isabelle Breitman and Laurent Fabius. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:16, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sining Mouse

The article Sining Mouse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is either a wholly non-notable band, or a hoax. A Google search turns up nothing, most of the article is redlinked, and the few blue links are to obviously wrong targets. Even the band's website appears to be defunct.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnInDC (talk) 18:07, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Pleasure of Being Robbed

The article The Pleasure of Being Robbed has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film that does not meet any of the requirements for inclusion as outlined at WP:NFILM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 19:07, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sining Mouse

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sining Mouse, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Christopher Connor (talk) 01:39, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Adding category "Jewish films"

I've just reverted several of your edits adding certain films to the category "Jewish films". I can't really tell why you're adding them other than the films are by Jews (Woody Allen) or broadly about them (Gentleman's Agreement). I'll concede that the category is a little vague to begin with but I do think that general release films need to be a little more closely tied to distinctly Jewish themes than those that you added. At the very least you should be explaining your decisions in your edit summaries or on the article talk pages. Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 15:26, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. JohnInDC (talk) 11:03, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Again, please stop marking your non-minor edits as "minor". Anything that adds to or changes the substance of an article, which your edits commonly do, is not "minor". Thanks. JohnInDC (talk) 15:50, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Sining Mouse article

Earlier this year you created the article Sining Mouse. It purported to be about a band called "Signing Mouse", formed in 2004, whose website was at www.withthesingingmouse.com (a website that does not exist). Its members included Ettore Ovazza, a Turin native who died in 1943, and BF Powers, who it was alleged, "died after a slipping and falling in the shower on a bar of soap there was no funeral". Can you explain why you created this article, which has now been deleted as a hoax? Jayjg ^(talk) 05:02, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Please respond here; if you won't, I will block you to get your attention. Jayjg ^(talk) 00:42, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for failing to respond to concerns raised here. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Robotpotato, your talk page is a long list of concerns raised, and you have yet to respond to even one. You were warned you would be blocked if you didn't respond to the latest concerns, about the hoax article you created. Please respond here. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:42, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Jayjg ]] I am quite sorry about Sining Mouse it was created for a community college project that was assigned to a small class that I was a student in. And one of the projects was to create a fake article on a web site, so I created that article I was against the project by I did honestly have fun making it it was a hoax, my only hoax.

And why do you keep adding various unsourced, poorly sourced, or disputed material to articles, continually misuse of the "minor edit" tag, and never respond to any of the comments about it on your Talk: page? Your Talk: page is full of concerns other editors have raised, and this is the first time you've responded. In fact, you've made over 700 edits, yet only one edit to an article talk page, and one edit to a user talk page, this one. Jayjg ^(talk) 05:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)