User talk:Robvanvee/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Robvanvee. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
"420" collaboration
As a member of WikiProject Cannabis, you are invited to help organize the project's upcoming "420" collaboration, which is scheduled for April 2017. Yes, we're a few months away, but we're hoping to get the ball rolling by getting buy-in from experienced Wikipedia editors and seek help fleshing out some goals and ideas for a successful campaign. We also plan to conduct both on-wiki and offlline outreach so non-Wikipedias can also contribute. If you are interested in participating, please sign up and contribute to the ongoing discussions. All editors are welcome! ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:54, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 January 2017
- From the editor: Next steps for the Signpost
- News and notes: Surge in RFA promotions—a sign of lasting change?
- In the media: Year-end roundups, Wikipedia's 16th birthday, and more
- Featured content: One year ends, and another begins
- Arbitration report: Concluding 2016 and covering 2017's first two cases
- Traffic report: Out with the old, in with the new
- Technology report: Tech present, past, and future
New Page Review - newsletter No.2
- A HUGE backlog
We now have 805 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.
The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.
- Second set of eyes
Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.
- Abuse
This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and
- this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
- this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
- This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.
Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should also consider making it a little harder for IPs to create articles! Robvanvee 06:56, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 February 2017
- Arbitration report: WMF Legal and ArbCom weigh in on tension between disclosure requirements and user privacy
- WikiProject report: For the birds!
- Technology report: Better PDFs, backup plans, and birthday wishes
- Traffic report: Cool It Now
- Featured content: Three weeks dominated by articles
New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review - newsletter No.3
Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.
- Still a MASSIVE backlog
We now have 805 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.
Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Though same editing style, recent IPs were currently located in Russia that focus on Psychosocial (song). Can you keep an eye of the page? 183.171.180.207 (talk) 07:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Added to my watchlist! Cheers. Robvanvee 07:36, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
PJ Harvey
Hi Robvanvee,
Yesterday I added a sentence about PJ Harvey's parents' friendship with Rolling Stones founder and keyboardist Ian Stewart. She talked about this in an audio interview with Rock's Backpages editor Barney Hoskyns to which I can't offer a link since it was a download from their members-only archive. However I looked for an online source, and found an entry on the subject at the Telegraph. My question for you: Is that newspaper a trustworthy source for wikipedia? Please have a look:
Kind regards from Austria,
Simon (Les Pelicules)
- Hi Simon. Sorry for reverting but with biography's of living people all information added needs to be cited. Yes, I would say that is definitely a reliable source. Let me know if I can assist with anything else. Happy editing. Robvanvee 15:05, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 February 2017
- From the editors: Results from our poll on subscription and delivery, and a new RSS feed
- Recent research: Special issue: Wikipedia in education
- Technology report: Responsive content on desktop; Offline content in Android app
- In the media: The Daily Mail does not run Wikipedia
- Gallery: A Met montage
- Special report: Peer review – a history and call for reviewers
- Op-ed: Wikipedia has cancer
- Featured content: The dominance of articles continues
- Traffic report: Love, football, and politics
editing articles
Hey,
I don't come here often on these talk pages.
It's not my intention to get wrong information across this Wikipedia encyclopedia. As I'm a fan of Depeche Mode & James Bond I know a lot about it. So I'm usually not wrong about my info.
Often I see several info missing, wrong, ... There's still something missing on the Depeche Mode & James Bond pages.
I just wanted to help, but I don't care anymore. Just haven't got the ambition to search for the right links or be an editor when one of those million other users change it seconds later.
Thanks for the warning, but I'll try to leave things as they are on Wikipedia.
Greetings,
- Sorry to hear you feel that way but un/fortunately all info especially new info needs to be reliably sourced even if you know a lot about the subject. In fact, any unsourced info may be deleted if an editor decides it needs to be or should be sourced. I know sourcing is a pain but it's what gives Wikipedia validity. Robvanvee 14:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Fatso Forgotso.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Fatso Forgotso.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Supa Scoopa and Mighty Scoop.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Supa Scoopa and Mighty Scoop.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:10, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Mexicola (Queens of the Stone Age song).ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Mexicola (Queens of the Stone Age song).ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:Stoker at Up the Creek.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stoker at Up the Creek.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000Bot (talk) 19:00, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 805 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!
But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.
Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 June 2017
- From the editors: Signpost status: On reserve power, help wanted!
- News and notes: Global Elections
- Arbitration report: Cases closed in the Pacific and with Magioladitis
- Featured content: Three months in the land of the featured
- In the media: Did Wikipedia just assume Garfield's gender?
- Recent research: Wikipedia bot wars capture the imagination of the popular press
- Technology report: Tech news catch-up
- Traffic report: Film on Top: Sampling the weekly top 10
Once in a Lifetime
What exactly, in this case, would constitute a 'reliable' source? 2602:30A:C02F:5C50:A03C:8D20:FD23:D5B8 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Why don't you start here. Robvanvee 07:27, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 June 2017
- News and notes: Departments reorganized at Wikimedia Foundation, and a month without new RfAs (so far)
- In the media: Kalanick's nipples; Episode #138 of Drama on the Hill
- Op-ed: Facto Post: a fresh take
- Featured content: Will there ever be a break? The slew of featured content continues
- Traffic report: Wonder Woman beats Batman, The Mummy, Darth Vader and the Earth
- Technology report: Improved search, and WMF data scientist tells all
Would you be willing to weigh in this discussion regarding The Needle Drop should be count as an reliable source or not. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 03:39, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- While I think the guy is a dick, I don't know enough about his work to know whether it could be considered reliable or not. I was merely enforcing existing policy. My gut feel is unreliable though. Either way, it seems this discussion has petered out? Robvanvee 15:15, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry I didn't understand in that last part. What do you mean by "petered out"? TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- I mean...it looks like the conversation was last edited a few days ago and has since gone a bit quiet. Has a consensus been reached? Would my commenting still make any difference? Robvanvee 16:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- The conversation is still going, you can find the latest comment here. The reason I ask you to join in the conversation because I see editors keep adding The Needle Drop in The Money Store article recently. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- I mean...it looks like the conversation was last edited a few days ago and has since gone a bit quiet. Has a consensus been reached? Would my commenting still make any difference? Robvanvee 16:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry I didn't understand in that last part. What do you mean by "petered out"? TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:29, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
- Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
Technology update:
- Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
- The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
- User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
- User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through
General project update:
- Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 July 2017
- News and notes: French chapter woes, new affiliates and more WMF team changes
- Featured content: Spectacular animals, Pine Trees screens, and more
- In the media: Concern about access and fairness, Foundation expenditures, and relationship to real-world politics and commerce
- Recent research: The chilling effect of surveillance on Wikipedia readers
- Gallery: A mix of patterns
- Humour: The Infobox Game
- Traffic report: Film, television and Internet phenomena reign with some room left over for America's birthday
- Technology report: New features in development; more breaking changes for scripts
- Wikicup: 2017 WikiCup round 3 wrap-up
Source
"providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first" lol ok, the source is literally the Allmusic entry. I guess Allmusic isn't a reliable source for genres? if so the genre section can stay blank until someone finds a source for it or establishes consensus on the talk page. 00090R (talk) 15:49, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- Firstly, you need to use in-line citations. The fact that there is an Allmusic article on the album doesn't classify as a "source". Secondly, as per this page, The Allmusic sidebar is not considered reliable on Wikipedia. I have no intention of pissing on your battery here but all info on Wikipedia needs to be reliably sourced, especially genre's and dates on music related articles. Robvanvee 16:40, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- aren't the rest of the Gastr del Sol genres unsourced? idk if I should delete them 00090R (talk) 17:02, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'm not familiar with the artist specifically but yes, any info that is unsourced may be removed if another editor challenges the validity of the addition. Just be careful because sometimes the genre is sourced lower down in the musical description/style section or the critical reception. Allmusic is acceptable as a source as long as the genre is quoted in the prose and not from the sidebar (for some reason the sidebar is not considered reliable). Hope that helps. Robvanvee 05:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 5 August 2017
- Recent research: Wikipedia can increase local tourism by +9%; predicting article quality with deep learning; recent behavior predicts quality
- WikiProject report: Comic relief
- In the media: Wikipedia used to judge death penalty, arms smuggling, Indonesian governance, and HOTTEST celebrity
- Traffic report: Swedish countess tops the list
- Featured content: Everywhere in the lead
- Technology report: Introducing TechCom
- Humour: WWASOHs and ETCSSs
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
Technology update:
- Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
General project update:
- The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
- Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Highya
 | This user is a daggafarian. |
--MickeyDangerez (talk) 10:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- Howzit. Robvanvee 11:09, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
- I sent you a message on FB. Did you get it? Robvanvee 11:13, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 September 2017
- From the editors: What happened at Wikimania?
- News and notes: Basselpedia; WMF Board of Trustees appointments
- Featured content: Warfighters and their tools or trees and butterflies
- Traffic report: A fortnight of conflicts
- Special report: Biomedical content, and some thoughts on its future
- Recent research: Discussion summarization; Twitter bots tracking government edits; extracting trivia from Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: WikiProject YouTube
- Technology report: Latest tech news
- Wikicup: 2017 WikiCup round 4 wrap-up
- Humour: Bots
File:The Dagga Couple.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Dagga Couple.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 02:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Genres
Just a question; why are you only removing the genres I add and not the other unsourced genres? There are so many other unsourced genres that you decide to keep, but if I add it then you remove it. Plus, I think we should have placeholder genres until we have sourced ones to replace them. SuperLuigi22 (talk|contribs) 14:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- You are welcome to remove genre's that are unsourced and my reverting you is not personal. I strongly disagree with that suggestion and I think most other editors would too. Personally I would rather not see a genre than have to see people adding genre's ad nauseam each with their own interpretation. Please stick to adding genre's that are sourced as this improves the validity of Wikipedia. Thank you. Robvanvee 18:27, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Improve an article request
Hello, sir, I want your help very much for improve an draft article. Name- Draft:Aap Ke Aa Jane Se is article about an new Zee TV's Upcoming show if want any information about this show check it about on google , But please improve it as an article thank you. Sir. Please help me iam so want your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Http002 (talk • contribs) 12:10, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry mate, I've got my areas of interest. Also, to edit here you kinda need to be able to speak English. Alternatively you could look for the wiki in your native language. Robvanvee 12:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
- Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
Technology update:
- The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225
General project update:
- On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
- Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 September 2017
- News and notes: Chapter updates; ACTRIAL
- Humour: Chickenz
- Recent research: Wikipedia articles vs. concepts; Wikipedia usage in Europe
- Technology report: Flow restarted; Wikidata connection notifications
- Gallery: Chicken mania
- Traffic report: Fights and frights
- Featured content: Flying high
For the 'Harmonicraft' Dilemma...
The genre of pop rock is found on many of their other albums, within the 'info box'. You say that I should cite a source for the "new" genre documented, even though the other existent genre on that page isn't referenced, therefore they are substantiated. Are you telling me that the consensus for genres can be found throughout 'Wikipedia'? I'm sorry, but that just isn't true. Then again, I understand if it's controversially applied e.g. applying rap metal to 'Harmonicraft' because of hearing an element of it *on one part of a song* <--- (an edit as of 02:34, 5 October 2017 (UTC) to be more specific in order to highlight the nature of frivolous edits) on the album. But, it wasn't the situation here. --Bl1tzkrieg1940 (talk) 15:27, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
- All info, especially genre's should be sourced. Even though I agree there are elements of pop-rock, in the interest of creating a quality encyclopedia we should strive towards sourcing all genre's. If we don't, opinion dominates future additions. Have you tried to source pop-rock? Robvanvee 18:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
But they generally aren't man, lol. As a matter of fact, they aren't for the most part referenced. Believe me, this isn't conjecture or subjectivity because I take this very seriously. In the case of their being a supposed newfound element on the album; I understand if you have an issue regarding a citation for substantiation. If I wasn't already clear enough the genre for this album isn't even attached to a source, and many by this band aren't. Both aforementioned genres are very applicable seeing as they can be found on their prior albums. This isn't meant to be contentious, but rather to refute what the acting standard is because, honestly, it doesn't make too much sense. Really and truly, you can find many other sub-genres or genres within many of the songs on this album if you're saying that post-hardcore, metalcore and heavy metal cannot be found as well. --Bl1tzkrieg1940 (talk) 02:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- Feel free to remove any unsourced genre's, unless they fit the sky is blue argument perhaps. In this case however, the words of User:Binksternet are rather applicable: Wikipedia is built on WP:SECONDARY sources not the opinions of fine upstanding editors like yourself. Robvanvee 17:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
I'm not going to dictate what you're implementing --- however, I will examine a scenario where this is found. User:Binksternet saying "...A genre must predominate if it is listed in the infobox." on that page is exactly the school of thought I assumed for 'Wikipedia', actually. It's something that makes sound sense, which is what I was supporting. In the case of 'Torche' having numerous other documentations of 'pop rock'; that is why I did what I did. Something tells me you take a neutral, objective approach to conversation but I really can't discern if "...fine upstanding editors..." was sardonic or not. --Bl1tzkrieg1940 (talk) 23:05, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- When in doubt, assume good faith. Robvanvee 07:26, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
|
Hey. I'm just wondering why 'Pleasure little, treasure' doesn't figure in the listing. Bananaskinz (talk) 03:53, 20 October 2017 (UTC) |
- What listing? Robvanvee 05:36, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
- We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
Technology update:
- Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
General project update:
- The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 October 2017
- News and notes: Money! WMF fundraising, Wikimedia strategy, WMF new office!
- Featured content: Don, Marcel, Emily, Jessica and other notables
- Humour: Guys named Ralph
- In the media: Facebook and poetry
- Special report: Working with GLAMs in the UK
- Traffic report: Death, disaster, and entertainment
DYK for Oblation (album)
On 28 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Oblation (album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Floor's use of the "bomb string" on their album Oblation was described as "a guitar string tuned so low it flaps like a pensioner's bingo wing"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oblation (album). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Oblation (album)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Precious four years!
 | |
| Four years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Holy crap! Another year has passed... Thanks Gerda! Robvanvee 08:05, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 24 November 2017
- News and notes: Cons, cons, cons
- Arbitration report: Administrator desysoped; How to deal with crosswiki issues; Mister Wiki case likely
- Technology report: Searching and surveying
- Interview: A featured article centurion
- WikiProject report: Recommendations for WikiProjects
- In the media: Open knowledge platform as a media institution
- Traffic report: Strange and inappropriate
- Featured content: We will remember them
- Recent research: Who wrote this? New dataset on the provenance of Wikipedia text
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Robvanvee. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Backlog update:
- The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
- Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
Outreach and Invitations:
- If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with:
{{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.
New Year New Page Review Drive
- A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
- Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.
General project update:
- ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
- The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
- To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wizard Bloody Wizard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Analog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:38, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 December 2017
- Special report: Women in Red World Contest wrap-up
- Featured content: Featured content to finish 2017
- In the media: Stolen seagulls, public domain primates and more
- Arbitration report: Last case of 2017: Mister Wiki editors
- Gallery: Wiki loving
- Recent research: French medical articles have "high rate of veracity"
- Technology report: Your wish lists and more Wikimedia tech
- Traffic report: Notable heroes and bad guys
Would you be willing to weigh in this discussion regarding the infobox should keep "playlist" instead of mixtape. Only if you interested. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 19:53, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
- Hey Peanuts. I would but I'm afraid I don't know the first thing about this guy, so not sure I'm in a position to comment. Robvanvee 14:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
- That's okay, you don't have to if you don't know much information about this project. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:43, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Cliff Burton
Don't revert back. Just remove it. It's redundant to have him in a parent category when he is already in a sub-category. He is in 20th-century American bassists category. No need to have him in 20th-century American musicians category. If you're so concerned with him not being put in guitarist categories, you might want to remove "guitar" from the infobox. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 23:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
New Years new page backlog drive
Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!
We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!
The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.
Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:
- The total number of reviews completed for the month.
- The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.
NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.
If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
| | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Robvanvee. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |