Rockcenter
I am a new user. Reply to me.
True. Welcome to Wikipedia. It is always a good to enter an edit summary to let other know what you changed or added. Make it concise. See WP:ES for details.
Ariconte (talk) 03:35, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
edit{{subst:submit}}
to the top of the article.)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sue Galloway.
- To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mabdul 10:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
NBCUniversal
editHello! Was there any reason why you deleted a cited point from this article without an edit summary? Best, Markvs88 (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia - not a TV listings site - your previous edit has again been reverted - If you believe that this TV listing is an important enough thing about Thursday for the whole of the world, then please discuss it on the articles talk page. 07:52, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Warning
editPlease do not post nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia articles, like you did on Saturday Night Live (season 38). This has been reverted. If you wish to test, please use the Wikipedia:Sandbox. Mitch32(There is a destiny that makes us... family.) 03:46, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi Rockcenter, and thank you for leaving feedback. I'm really glad that you're enjoying using and editing Wikipedia! If you haven't already, you may want to take the tutorial to learn the basics of editing. Should you need help at any point, please feel free to contact me on my talkpage or ask at the helpdesk.
♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 11:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
|Nothing
editConcerning this edit. For future reference, when you are reverted on Wikipedia and you disagree, the convention is to then open a discussion. See WP:BRD. Simply reapplying the same edit can be taken as edit warring. Edit warring is considered a serious breach of behavioural policy. I realise that you are a good faith editor (please keep up the good work), this is jsut friendly advice. SpinningSpark 09:35, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
editThe article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
-- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 14:42, 9 August 2012 (UTC)How would you like to sign in this proposal to work on Cheers- and frasier-related articles? --George Ho (talk) 19:22, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
- Click above, or click this. Then sign your name in the list if you found it. --George Ho (talk) 23:43, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
November 2012
editHello, I'm Ocaasi. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jan Ebeling because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Ocaasi t | c 14:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 15
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WNAB, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scrubs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 27
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bill Cosby, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:20, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Frasier Crane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doctor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:57, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
One-man band
editHi. I've reverted your page move of One-man band because I do not believe any of the cites use the term "One-person band", or that "One-person band" has any notability or common usage. If you still wish to propose moving the page, please suggest it on the talk page, preferably demonstrating usage of "One-person band" in reliable sources. Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:50, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sue Galloway, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 08:21, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Sue Galloway
editHello Rockcenter. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Sue Galloway.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sue Galloway}}
, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:03, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
editHello, Rockcenter. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
editHello, Rockcenter. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 21
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shannon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
editHello, Rockcenter. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Problem with your custom signature
editYou have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.
The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.
The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.
- Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
- Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
- Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
- Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
- Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
- Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
- Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.
More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
editYour submission at Articles for creation: Luna Li (December 29)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Luna Li and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Luna Li, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Rockcenter!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 15:24, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
|