Rockismorethanmusic

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Skateremorocker(2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Hoponpop69 (talk) 05:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Ivoryline

The article Ivoryline has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. J Milburn (talk) 17:54, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk Page Signatures

I noticed that you seem to be signing your talk page comments with User:Rockismorethanmusic. Have you tried using four "~" ? as in ~~~~? Typing that will automatically sign your comments for you and then the signbot will not come and add it's signature. If you already know this and there is some other reason you are using the signature you are, feel free to ignore this message. Axcess (talk) 16:33, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Ivoryline

A tag has been placed on Ivoryline requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Truthanado (talk) 02:34, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Changing sourced content into Innacurate information

This concerns your edit here[1]:

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Hoponpop69 (talk) 18:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Your edit to Hawk Nelson

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Thank you. Hoponpop69 (talk) 02:03, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Divied By Friday

A tag has been placed on Divied By Friday requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fritzpoll (talk) 19:45, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Divied by Friday

Hi, I tagged your article, because until they release an album, I don't believe they satisfy the notability guidelines at WP:MUSIC - feel free to discuss this on my talk page Fritzpoll (talk) 19:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Divied By Friday

A tag has been placed on Divied By Friday requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Izzy007 Talk 20:43, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Divied By Friday

A tag has been placed on Divied By Friday requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Izzy007 Talk 20:52, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Divied By Friday

I have nominated Divied By Friday, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Divied By Friday. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Fritzpoll (talk) 20:56, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Your edit to The Classic Crime

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.Hoponpop69 (talk) 03:39, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

August Burns Red

Do you own this article, I wasn't aware of that? Do not removed sourced information just because you do not agree with it, and based solely upon your personal opinion. Please seeWP:Source AOL music is a reliable source by all standards, just because you don't like wht they say means nothing. Dwrayosrfour (talk) 00:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Hoponpop69 (talk) 22:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Children 18:3

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Children 18:3, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Children 18:3. Oo7565 (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 23:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

For your edits to those Underoath albums, trying to say they were unblack metal. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 23:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

I have chosen to strike through my last comment as it has been brought to my attention it may not have been "vandalism". But, seriously, I put hidden messages on those albums that say, specifically to discuss genre changes on the talk pages. Do so if you want. Blizzard Beast ^$ODIN$ 23:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Children 18:3

An article that you have been involved in editing, Children 18:3, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Children 18:3. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? DAJF (talk) 05:09, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Children 18:3

Hi Andrew, I've edited your article that was up for deletion, Children 18:3, and hopefully it's considered notable enough now since it now has refs and info about notability. I don't have feedback from anyone else about this, though, so others might still vote for deleting it. Just letting you know that I've tried my shot at "rescuing the article". The rest is basically now up to the Wikipedia community. Have a nice day! --JamieS93 02:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

No problem, you're welcome. :) As for Ivoryline, the article is currently fully protected; that is, only administrators can edit it. It looks like User:Starblind did this prevent re-creation of the article after the "6th deletion". The article has been speedy deleted (A7) at least five times, which means users were having strong notability concerns. And actually, I agree with the previous deletions; a Google search proves that the band isn't notable enough. If you want me to expound further on this, drop me a note. Also, let me know if you need help with anything else Christian music-related (I specialize in writing and editing those kinds of articles). Kind regards, JamieS93 13:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)