Cuj...

edit

Stvarno me smara da se raspravljam o odredjenoj lingvistickoj oblasti sa kvazilingvistima. Ako si trazio ekspertsko misljenje, dobio si ga. Ako to nije dovoljno dobro, sta da ti radim... Ionako vremena na bacanje nemam. --millosh (talk (sr:)) 18:42, 11 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I don't know which is your first language but you seem to know English. Do you wish to discuss the nature of vandalism? Are my points all but encyclopaedic? Have you sat and read many of the other articles? Are you not confusing me with the dozen or so other people who use this terminal each with their own password? Ragusan 19 October 2005

Just one more thing worth mentioning...I have no idea if you have any links to anybody from the former Yugoslavia but you seem to think you know a lot. If I went off on a tangem and lost the plot on the Montenegrin article then that was so; I certainly felt the details were relevant and easily understood by anyone wishing to do so. You switched my reference of the language of Bosnia back to the Serbian spoken in Bosnia. What the hell is that supposed to mean? I was raised in a town called Brcko to a mostly Croatian background, there is no damn difference between the speech of my father born in that town and the local Serbs. But the speech of the Serbs in Brcko varies with the speech of Serbs in other parts of Bosnia and Herzogovina (and I say the last names not as a single entity but advisedly as two distinct regions) but in any vilage or district where Serbs are settled alongside Muslims and Croats there is NO difference in speech, only writing with Serbs favouring a Cyrillic. I will soon be making ALL these relevant points on here and I warn you from now, watch where you tread - you are entitled to your views and I respect every one of them and will do nothing to alter your entries. I ask the same of you and everyone else. Ragusan 18 October 2005

Izvini, nisam znao da si naš čovjek; kao što ja kažem "The English must not get the wrong end of the stick and be misled about us!". Pa nema problema sada, samo žao mi je što ne mogu da pišem to što bih htio. Puno pozdrav druže... Ragusan 20 Listopad/Oktobar 2005

Hvala ti Rocky, sve je u redu, ja se ne ljutim (ali na pocetkom sam mislio da si Amerikanac, bez veze sa YU), probat ću ponovo objasniti o Crnoj Gori ali ovaj put, bit će više 'Encyclopaedic'... ako hoćeš promjeniti nešto, molim te piši mi prvo! Mnogo pozdrav. Ragusan 21 Okt. 05

Serbo-Brazilian

edit

Hi Rocky!

Although I have this typically Serbian name, I'm Brazilian, and I started learning Serbian a few weeks ago, by myself. I have never been to Serbia, but my father was from there (he was born in Leskovac), and I want to visit my father's country, hope it will be soon, I'm saving money for that!

I don't know if I can give many contributions to Serbian topics on Wikipedia, but if I can do it, I will!

-)

Pozdrav od

Milene

Article Improvement Belgrade

edit

You may wish to vote for Belgrade at the Article Improvement Drive page, here. --estavisti 21:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Latin America won!

edit
 
Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Latin America was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Joyous | Talk 19:10, 9 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Bruce Lee

edit

Your edit summary for your recent cleanup editing at the above article made me smile, as I've been watching crazy hero-worship stuff be added to it over and over for a couple of years now. Let's say that Bruce still has many very enthusiastic fans. I look in on that and related articles when I can to try to keep things a little less outrageous, but those got by me. Cheers! --Fire Star 21:40, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Invitation

edit

Hello! I invite you to join the WikiProject Serbia. All the best, --serbiana - talk 02:37, 13 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Spell check

edit

I didn't change any NPOV information with my spell check. The material you re-added was deleted by user 172, not me. Art LaPella 19:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for Choosing Belgrade

edit
 
Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Belgrade was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the the AID Maintenance TeamReply

hi

edit

"Demographic history of Kosovo (→20th century - I have put speculation in the article, but I will try to find citations. But that aside, Arnaut is old (pre 19th century) name for Albanians. Derrogative (ironically) is Šiptar.) (top)" That was your part.

I thank you for contributing in removing speculations. I just want to refresh your memory that it was Seselj types (in the 20th century) who mentioned that "Arnauti" should be expelled "preko Prokletija", thus what I wrote was not wrong at all. "Siptar" is just another derrogative, in the group of many, that Serbian extreme nationalists use against Albanians in Kosovo. Greetings, ilir_pz 22:43, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

With all due respect, if a foreigner reads that title in original "Iseljavanje Arnauta", even if he/she knows the derrogative form for Albanian name, he will have no clue what "Arnaut" stands for. So it is relevant. No matter if it was "en vogue" (ironically) in earlier years to be used it needs to be clarified, as it is one of the derrogative forms. You say "A term cannot have negative conotations for only being used in a negative sentence by a negative person. ", I think we are talking about a document prepared by the Serbian Academy of Arts(yeah right) and Sciences for expulsion of Albanians. Vaso Cubrilovic was only the head of that Academy, so he is not some individual out there, but an important person. Sorry for not signing fully in my previous comment, wasn't my fault, I put 4 tildas, seems like not all of them worked. Hope this time they will. Ilir pz 01:01, 8 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Now that is some arts, expulsion of a different nation. Never mind that. I do not agree with your "wikification" of the name "Arnaut" as it is not an alternative name for Albanian, it IS a derrogative. Thus I will remove it. Ilir pz 16:23, 8 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

vandal

edit

To call Castro a dictator and Che Guevera a serial killer is not vandalism, but a mere statement of fact. By reversing those edits you are showing your self to be a supporter of murderers and communists who is unconfortable with the truth. I will begin to review your other edits to see what else you have incorrectly edited to bring back objectivity and truthfullness to those pages.Incorrect 22:56, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Serial killer - definition

edit

Serial killer is a term applied to a specific type of criminal behavior by forensic psychologists and criminologists in the United States. Serial killers are criminals, not politicians, and are handled through the Criminal Justice System. Serial killers are solitary individuals acting alone and never for political or military reasons. The motivations of a serial killer are individual to that person. Theodore Bundy is an example of a serial killer. KarenAnn 11:49, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Re Serial Killer

edit

Sorry, I was mixed up about who put it there. My apologies to you. KarenAnn 22:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

Please help on William Shakespeare

edit
 
Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week William Shakespeare was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help…

Posted by PruneauT 01:03, 20 June 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the AID maintenance team.Reply

Folk song about bruce lee?

edit

what is the title of it?

Street Fighter Alpha

edit

Paradisi

edit

Removing the copyrighted-to-Move Records material from Pietro Domenico Paradisi unless you were, in fact, its author also and release it under the GFDL Schissel | Sound the Note! 06:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Re: I have removed too much from the article

edit

Actually, if you look at the Copyright rules- one reverts to the last version that contained uncopyrighted material (correction: the most recent version not to have copyright problems- but: since all the versions contain your cut-and-paste of copyrighted material, whether or not they contain new material- they're still copyright problems. So... Wikipedia:Copyright_problems... issue...), whether or not there have been original changes since. Since that last version was before the article was created, I compromised and removed all the material in your first version that wasn't copyrighted- the first paragraph. One can now make a new version based entirely on GFDL material on a temporary page. (Oh, and one other thing? When it says, don't remove material, write on a temporary page until copyright matters can be hashed out- it means it, thank you. Don't remove a {{ sort of thing because you want to, don't buy problems for someone else's website. Thanks again.) Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Aguri_Suzuki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia, as you did in Keri Russell. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links as long as the content abides by our policies and guidelines. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Yamla 19:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

208says:Hi Rocky, I c Yamla jumped all over u as well. I appreciate u also agreeing that the links I added r not spam. Please go to here , the Keri Russell discussion page and comment. I have been corresponding with Yamla but he thinks knows what is appropriate and what isnt, then he said something about flash. I think the links r all important, even the felicity fan page. Thx Rocky!

RockyMM: I would like also to suggest to you, 208.58.196.156, to register on Wikipedia, because it would make your editing easier, you could edit semi-protected pages, your edit history would be confined to your username, and also it would be easier to talk to you.RockyMM 13:31, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

208 says: Is it bad if I dont register? Are my edits not taken seriously? My parents are so worried about indentity theft so I dont like to register for anything online unless it is mandatory, & then I have to wait for my parents 2 b sitting here next 2 me. Is it bad that our IP address is visible...like some 1 could use it 2 get in2 our computer? (When we shut down the computer we take out the ethernet cord-->that is how scared&paranoid my parents r!) As far as semiprotected pages, I havent come across any that I needed to correct or add more info 2. About Keri Russell, I'm going to add the links but not add the noelcrane.com link.Thx again! ;)

Thanks for your comments on Derek Sherinian's page

edit

Saw your comments at Derek Sherinian Visit again if you like soon...I've added more stuff...and let me know what a barnstar is??? LOL Tvccs 13:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

After making about 400 edits to this thing, and really fiddling the layout to death, at this point I'd rather not, if possible, as the page in its present form has a lot of outside linked detail and layout info I haven't seen in a lot of Wiki pages. As I indicated, I've actually been in touch interviewing Derek about this stuff, which he thinks is very important, and I think the layout here has some improvements over the standard templates, which I did visit, unless I'm missing something in what you're saying??? That being said, I think it would be a good idea if you wanted to sandbox something to show a demo of what you have in mind? I'd be very interested in seeing it. I'm also going to expand the album listings and info and get the Planet X solo album detail up, and fix a bunch of minor fact errors I've found. Thanks again for your input! Tvccs 17:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Rocky...go ahead and use what you laid out on Talk:Derek Sherinian/Temp and change it, but use the present copy on the Wiki page as there have been additional changes...it looks good...just be sure the border color selected matches the Wiki formatting suggested. But I thank you very much, and I'll be getting back to you on the other stuff soon. Tvccs 03:10, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Derek_Sherinian"

Sherinian Images

edit

Trust me...I knew. It's been my own WikiNightmare. Any fair use image is under attack of a living person, and because I publicly disagreed on a talk page with how it was being enforced, all of my images came under attack. Derek was kind enough to let me use a lot of promotional images he provided to me personally, as well as other images that came from Clavia press releases, etc. He refuses to license them under GFDL, which would allow anyone to use them anywhere for anything without his knowledge or permission. That's the goal of a select few on here, and they are ramming their idea of a "free" Wikipedia down eveyone else's throat. There are many more images that were being used on other pages that were also deleted, with very few exceptions, no matter what Fair Use rationale was offered, and I've lost dozens of images and countless hours of work. Yes. I know the page now looks like hell, I'm sorry. Derek is fully aware of what's going on and is dumbfounded. If you look at my user contributions, you can see what's been going on. Thanks for the notice, and best wishes. Tvccs 12:58, 9 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Bio-img01.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bio-img01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 23:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Bio-img01.jpg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bio-img01.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BJBot 23:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Aguri_Suzuki.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Aguri_Suzuki.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 10:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi

edit

Can you take a look on article Demographic history of Bačka? User:Hobartimus just deleting results of 1715 census without explanation. 212.69.2.147 (talk) 10:28, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

"Tend to use"

edit

Hey, I didn't want to revert your edit as I wanted to see that you understand what someone meant when they wrote that on Montenegrin language article. It is like that Montenegrin language, Latin is more used than Cyrillic, by government, media etc... like Cyrillic is in Serbia. Mislim da je to sta je pjesnik htio da kaze :-). Pozdrav! Rave92(talk) 15:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:57, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

B92 Top 100

edit

Čisto iz radoznalosti: zašto bi neko nominovao za brisanje članak kakav je B92 Top 100 Domestic Songs? Jer, da se ne lažemo, ne brine tebe što se ne može potvriditi da je lista takva kakva je u članku, to je najmanji problem. Ostalocutanje (talk) 15:09, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ja sam na engleskoj Vikipediji od 2006, koliko mi se čini. Ne volim da vidim dead linkove, volim da ispravljam gramatičke greške, takoreći grammar-Nazi. To da se lista ne može potvrditi je veliki problem. Ako je takva stvar listi jednostavno nije mesto na Vikipediji. Možda bi na srpskoj Vikipediji - sr.wikipedia.org - prihvatili članak zato što je notable u domaćim okvirima. Ali u svetskim - ipak ne. --RockyMM (talk) 16:26, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Ja sam na engleskoj Wikipedii od 2005, čini mi se, i milosppfa, koji je članak napravio, imao sam prilike da upoznam, i znam da mu je engleski jezik struka - uostalom, nisam primetio neke gramatičke greške u članku? Ovaj članak je, ja verujem, dovoljno značajan da se nađe na Wikipedii. Možda ti smatraš da su srpska i jugoslovenska kultura "male kulture", no centrizmi su odavno srušeni. No dobro, tvoje mišljenje je takvo kakvo je. Ostalocutanje (talk) 16:47, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
Evo mog prvog edita, ako je bilo potrebno - [1], avgust 2005. Ne smatram da su srpska i jugoslovenska kultura "male kulture", već ako želimo s nečim da se predstavimo da to ipak bude kvalitetno. Pročitaj [2] i ono šta sam dodao na deletition discussion, tiče se linkova koje si našao koji verifikuju listu. --RockyMM (talk) 22:18, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Pomoć

edit

Imao sam poteškoća sa administratorima Wikipedije koji su mi odbili moj draft za srpskog odbojkaša koji igra za reprezentaciju, zbog "nepouzdanih" izvora. Jedini način da dokažem da su pouzdani je da dovedem čoveka koji govori srpski i koje može reći da su izvori pouzdani. Tako da te molim da mi pomogneš tako što bi proverio članke tj izvore koje sam stavio i da evaluiraš da li su dovoljno dobri za Wikipediju što jesu ali engleska Wikipedija traži potvrdu trećeg člana. Ako misliš da jesu samo napiši u odgovoru.

Hvala na vremenu.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Miran_Kujund%C5%BEi%C4%87 Narmerae (talk) 11:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply