RodrigoIPacce

Welcome!

Hi RodrigoIPacce! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Gderrin (talk) 21:43, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Benjamin Bernard Boateng

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Benjamin Bernard Boateng, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Mohamed Hamdy Zaky

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mohamed Hamdy Zaky, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Hossam Hassan (footballer, born 1989)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hossam Hassan (footballer, born 1989), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Himid Mao

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Himid Mao, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Ahmed Ali (footballer, born 1986)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ahmed Ali (footballer, born 1986), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Ahmed Magdy (footballer, born 1989)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ahmed Magdy (footballer, born 1989), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:16, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahmed Samy (April 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmed Samy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Hello, RodrigoIPacce! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Mahmoud Al Sayed

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Mahmoud Al Sayed, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:10, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 Ghazl El Mahalla SC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahmed El Sheikh. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Can you please explain to me in lower IQ terms, I kinda get it, but I don't. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 14:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

You are wrong. Thank you. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 17:40, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at Joe Carson (Petticoat Junction). Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 04:26, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

I am reading no good faith from this one. It feels petty. Do you have an issue with my edit on said article, Oh sorry I didn't link the correct spelling for chair in it. Here it is: https://www.bing.com/search?q=chair&qs=n&form=QBRE&sp=-1&ghc=1&lq=0&pq=chai&sc=10-4&sk=&cvid=B605239AECB440F79EE90968A53A2C36&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&ghpl= I hope you don't mind it's in plural. Thank you. and learn how to take humor. Here is an article on what humor is: https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=74bbd1c5f477e6ccJmltdHM9MTY4Mzc2MzIwMCZpZ3VpZD0yMTdhNmQyNy02NWExLTZjZDAtMWRmYy03ZjczNjRkZDZkYzcmaW5zaWQ9NTIwMg&ptn=3&hsh=3&fclid=217a6d27-65a1-6cd0-1dfc-7f7364dd6dc7&psq=humor+wiki&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly9lbi53aWtpcGVkaWEub3JnL3dpa2kvSHVtb3Vy&ntb=1

P.S: Let me edit in peace. Instead of trying to get me banned. Thank you. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 05:35, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Do not call other editors "clowns" or "cowards". These constitute personal attacks. Curbon7 (talk) 17:55, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Not it they are true. He barely replied earlier. I may have apologized for clown, but coward was called for. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 17:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Why are you paying attention to just me? Brother please leave me alone this does not concern you. Unless you are paid to do this. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 17:37, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Overlinking

Hi there. Thanks for improving the wording at Luc Nilis. I reverted your linking of "Belgium" as that would be considered a case "overlinking"; see MOS:OVERLINK for details. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 14:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! RodrigoIPacce (talk) 17:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Pioneers FC (Egypt) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Pioneers FC (Egypt). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:45, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

I tried to find sources online, but the club is poorly managed and they don't have anything on the internet. I am going down to their headquarters next week to chat about the club's history with the owner. I'll let you know if we can find any valid sources by then. Thanks buddy! RodrigoIPacce (talk) 17:21, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Transfermarkt again

As I've already explained to you, Transfermarkt should not be cited in articles. Per the site's login page: Whether player info, coach info, club info, or match report – as a Transfermarkt user, you can edit and add to almost all data by yourself. This makes it a self-published and therefore unreliable source. Citing sources you know to be unreliable is disruptive. Do not do that again. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

As i have already told you. You are wrong! If you can Edit something in Transfermarket that would be the case, but you can't. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 21:24, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

we must be using two different sites. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 21:24, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Go try and Edit something then talk. Thanks. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 21:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

on transfer market. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 21:26, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Brother it says "Submit" corrections! It has to be reviewed before being accepted. I have used this site before. What are you on about. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 21:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

The review is also done by volunteer contributors, not Transfermarkt staff. The process is not dissimilar to making an edit request to a fully protected article on Wikipedia. The review does not change the site's character as a self-published source. A cursory check of the relevant noticeboards (WP:RSN, WT:FOOTY) will show you that the use of Transfermarkt as a source has been consistently rejected when discussed. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:52, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

The edits are reviewed by top calss staticians. Sit down. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 23:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

They also ask for sources and they check if the sources are fit or not. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 23:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Proxy SC moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Proxy SC. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 18:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

I am sorry, but what you did was completely in the wrong. As if there aren't enough sources. You simply add that there needs to be more sources and citations. I have already published another article with one source, then someone added a template stating that it is only containing one source and needs to be "Improved", but you on the other hand. See 3 sources and decide to move it into the draft space. See my question is. Is this how you show humor? Because this joke is the behavior of a clown. I am republishing it and if you touch this article. I will report you to wikipedia for abuse of power. This was uncalled for, and you should try to pay attention to bigger problems, as this is not even a problem or a disruption. Thank you! RodrigoIPacce (talk) 21:34, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

If this was real life I swear I would give you a peice of my mind. What's wrong with you man? Why did you place a perfectly good article in draft! Now it won't ever get published! There are articles of clubs WITH NO SOURCE! THIS ONE HAS 3! Are you lazy to look for an actual bad one. HOW ABOUT YOU ADD MORE SOURCES IF YOU DON'T THE THREE THAT ARE ALREADY IN PLACE. You are one "special" person. A special! Case! I haven't dealt with someone as you. You see THREE SOURCES! YOUR FIRST INSTINCT! OH YEAH! DRAFT! Very Special indeed. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 01:32, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

I just ran into a club page that had NO SOURCES! Guess what I did! I added a source instead of acting rash. Also did you just not like the arabic sources? You think Arabs and Arabic sources are not credible? I had a previous one for La Vienna FC it wasn't as good as it is now, but it was approved. The person that approved it only did one thing. He saw one source. He marked it as one source, it was an arabic source. He is an Arab just like me. So this an issue with you brother? What the heck is your problem? read the previous part and do your job better like the previous brother. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 01:42, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proxy SC (May 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Proxy SC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proxy SC (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Proxy SC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 02:13, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Why don't you cut the shenanigans and stop giving me pre-made responses! Give me actual responses! Write! What's the issue? You can't understand the arabic? Brother! I literally described what the announcements were, I added a news outlet and finally their profile in a well respected website like 365 Scores! What is the issue? Explain! RodrigoIPacce (talk) 02:50, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Respond! Stop hiding behind pre made replies... (coward) RodrigoIPacce (talk) 02:51, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

It's like this gives you power and you enjoy it. You are a coward, because you won't admit you are wrong. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 02:52, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

I sent you a thank you to remind you. To highlight the major! Error you are committing behalf of this page. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 02:58, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proxy SC (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curbon7 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Proxy SC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 03:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Respond. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 13:54, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Proxy SC has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Proxy SC. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:12, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Do not edit my userpage

I do not appreciate it, especially considering it seems retaliatory for my declining this draft you've submitted. Curbon7 (talk) 17:31, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proxy SC (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Proxy SC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Improve what? It's a club in Egypt that was founded two years ago? Are you okay? RodrigoIPacce (talk) 15:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Bilbao

The source says 347.00. You can not read?--88.14.69.241 (talk) 09:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

I am sorry. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 15:10, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proxy SC (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Proxy SC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Significant coverage? IT IS A CLUB IN THE EGYPTIAN SECOND DIVISION I HAVE SEEN WORST APPROVED WITH NO SOURCE I GAVE YOU A NEW OUTLET A PROPER HISTORY WHICH QUALIFIES AS COVERAGE AND A RELIABLE CLUB PROFILE FROM A WEBSITE? IS ARABIC NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR YOU? DOES IT HAVE TO BE AN ENGLISH SOURCE? ARABIC IS SOMEWHAT NULLIFIED? RodrigoIPacce (talk) 15:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

News Outlet* RodrigoIPacce (talk) 15:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

THE SOURCE IS ALSO NOIT OWNED BY THE CLUB. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 15:18, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ahmed Samy

Hello, RodrigoIPacce. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahmed Samy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ahmed Samy

Hello, RodrigoIPacce. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ahmed Samy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 16:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pioneers FC (Egypt)

Hello, RodrigoIPacce. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pioneers FC (Egypt), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Proxy SC

Hello, RodrigoIPacce. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Proxy SC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Proxy SC

Hello, RodrigoIPacce. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Proxy SC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:13, 17 December 2023 (UTC)

Not even citing why you got rid of it, just straight up hating... someone has to meet their quota I guess. No different than a lazy government official. You are the same type of person that ruins projects and aspirations. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 16:42, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Wow, those are harsh comments. I was just following through on CSD G13 speedy deletions. The message tells you why the draft was deleted, because the draft had not been edited for six months. This is CSD policy, not my opinion. Stale drafts are deleted on a daily basis. The message also tells you how to request its restoration, by going to WP:REFUND and making a request. No problem, it will be restored! I don't think the personal attack is justifiable here. But I see you have also attacked RFC reviewers here but not pinged them so that they would know you had a question about their review and could respond to your questions. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Karel Komárek

Hello, I'm trying to understand why you reinstated a large chunk of content that was previously added by sockpuppets. Your edit summaries were not helpful and could be considered deliberately deceptive and the content you re-added (apart from being made by evading a block) appears to be a BLP violation. I would be very interested to know how you came across the article and why you decided to re-add that content. Please reply to this before you make any further edits, otherwise you may be blocked. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

@HJ Mitchell

Thank you for your attention. I came across the page while reading various articles and reviewing their histories on Wikipedia, and I found a peculiar case here. You mentioned that it violates BLP, which is an interesting accusation. I will follow your thoughts and join the discussion.

I read sources such as The Guardian, Radio Liberty, and other reputable ones, ant they clearly state  that the person is a Czech tycoon, working many years with Russia and Gazprom in various projects. I did not re-added it as you thought, but rewrote and add the basic information back piece-by-piece. It was pretty much sourced material, and it was removed without clear reasoning. Sorry that I did not longer edit summaries to explain my logic of editing.

Additionally, I did not find any sockpuppets in the page's history wich you refer too. And someone deleted the content with the comment “reverted sock” and there I think everything gone wrong. The Guardian, Radio Liberty and other good reliable sources were also removed and the page clearly became not neutral and not balanced. The only blocked account was blocked for disruptive editing, with the reason stated as "Clearly not here to build an encyclopedia: Single-purpose edit warrior."

You may check my talk page - I am on Wikipedia to be bald and do what I feel right with following the rules.

Once again, I'm happy to discuss and work on making the page correct per BLP. RodrigoIPacce (talk) 11:38, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:40, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)