Roetschild
November 2011
editThank you for experimenting with the page Final Solution on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Antique Rose — Drop me a line 15:41, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
I have moved your unorthodox statements to Talk:Final Solution. Feel free to discuss there, not on my talk page. Thank you. Antique Rose — Drop me a line 14:16, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
edit
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
or 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:18, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
December 2011
edit
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Final Solution, you may be blocked from editing. Jayjg (talk) 18:21, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Final Solution, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jayjg (talk) 20:03, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Jayjg , have complaints about your attitude and way of collaborating on Talk:Final Solution and my personal talk page. The way you respond on the information I provide is very intimidating. You give all kind of warnings and no feedback with respect of improving the article final solution. Like you are a know it all. Do not know your background, but in the professional environment I am from we call your attitude very disruptive and not scientific. You give me warnings and want to ban and you do not even (want to) see that I already provided all the reliable source. The primary source and the secondary sources. I am not proposing original research. I am proposing an improvement of the article with primary source and secondary sources. Have done the original research and give the facts from it back to Wikipedia. I do not post my personal views, you are. --Roetschild (talk) 20:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
- Roetschild, I am not "collaborating" with you on the article, I am telling you what you need to do to avoid being blocked. So far you have been remarkably resistant to accepting that information. Wikipedia is not a forum; editors and administrators here are volunteers, and do not have endless amounts of time and patience to discuss your novel ideas, or keep explaining to you Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. As has been explained to you many times, rather than your own original research based on primary sources, you must provide the views of reliable secondary sources. Random websites, for example, do not qualify. If you respond here, please restrict your response to a list of the reliable sources you wish to use. I will not respond here further to any comment other than one which lists those sources you consider reliable. Jayjg (talk) 20:38, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Sorry again: you have been remarkably resistant to accepting the fact that I provided the reliable source. That is why there is a discussion. Blaming me on your own attitude is not what I expected from editors of Wikipedia. It can not be that you have read the information I provided, otherwise you would not respond in the way you did. Ore you just do not want to know. Maybe you are a gatekeeper ore something like that. You know: someone who blocks the mass from relevant information. Wikipedia is on big un-reliable source now on the subject of the final solution. Tiring your behavior. I also only gave the answer to a question of somebody else. --Roetschild (talk) 21:13, 12 December 2011 (UTC)