Roger J Cooper
'Welcome!' (We can't say that loudly enough!)
Hello, Roger J Cooper, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Be Bold!
- Meet other new users
- Learn from others
- Play nicely with others
- Contribute, Contribute, Contribute!
- Tell us about you
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
We're so glad you're here! Luksuh 02:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on TripleA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: 
which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Syrthiss (talk) 11:58, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Roger - nobody is disagreeing that Triple A is used by a bunch of people and loved by them. At the time the article was deleted originally it failed to establish how it was notable. Because the article you created was basically unchanged from the version that was deleted (from some local copy on AAA's pages?), it didn't take any more steps to establish notability. The article could be recreated, but it needs to resolve the issues that caused it to be deleted in the first place or it will likely be deleted as a repost. If you'd like me to userfy it so you can work on it, you can let me know here or on my talk and I'll do that. Hope this helps. Syrthiss (talk) 11:39, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
I am not sure what the Wikipedia's criterion for notability is? It would seem that being used by bunch of people is what makes it notable. A game being supported by multiple websites seems notable to me. A downloadable game is obviously going to lack printed references.