RohypnolFTW
July 2008
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Xkcd, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. You vandalised the article to write about vandalism? That's new on me. Don't do it again, please? — Huntster (t • @ • c) 12:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- If you change them back to "win" and "fail"? Yeah, that'd be vandalism. If you mean change the other good stuff back, no, that's fine, actually. Also, I thought it was funny too, and I am one of xkcd's loyal readers. But I'm an admin here, too, so I gotta try and preserve the sanity of the article ;) — Huntster (t • @ • c) 12:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
August 2008
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hamas, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Fribbler (talk) 12:07, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tomorrow's Pioneers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fribbler (talk) 12:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
James Lonsdale-Bryans
editYep, it's fine. See Category:Heads of Missions of the United Kingdom for what you are talking about. --Tom (talk - email) 15:55, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:LordHalifax.jpg
editThanks for uploading Image:LordHalifax.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:31, 1 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 10:31, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of AXFS
editI have nominated AXFS, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AXFS. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Joe Chill (talk) 12:18, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
File:James Lonsdale-Bryans.jpg listed for discussion
editA file that you uploaded or altered, File:James Lonsdale-Bryans.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 27 September 2021 (UTC)