Rokaszil

Speedy deletion declined: Alan Dupont

Hello Rokaszil, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of Alan Dupont - a page you tagged - because: A Professor may not be notable, but he is unlikely to be speedy deletable. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. ϢereSpielChequers 16:48, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, this article is very disorderly :) Rokaszil (talk) 16:51, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, though its a bit better now. But for deletion we need to focus on the potential of the subject, not the quality of the article. ϢereSpielChequers 19:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Biographies of living people

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you. -- ChrisO (talk) 15:48, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Bola Tinubu

You are doing valuable work in undoing vandalism.

You reverted a very suspicious change to the article on Bola Tinubu. You spotted that User:Locutus de kuramo on his first edit had removed a lot of content.

I do not know why he did that, but what he took out mostly did not have any sources. He may have felt it did not belong. Removing content that does have sources is usually vandalism. When new users do it, it is almost certainly vandalism. But if a new user has removed content that does not have sources, you should maybe look at what they removed. It is possible that they are taking out material that they know is wrong.

In this case, I don't know if that is true or not. Almost always, a major removal by a new or anonymous user is wrong. Nobody will have any problem is you revert edits like this. You should keep doing what you are doing. It is very useful. Aymatth2 (talk) 22:33, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

CSD templates

Hi, when you tag an article for speedy deletion, make sure you use the template that corresponds to the appropriate criteria. Thanks. -Reconsider! 12:25, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Rokaszil (talk) 12:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)