User talk:RolandR/Archive 13
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:RolandR. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 17 |
FYI
Hello R. I wanted to let you know that about this thread Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Post by Dydgsbdh where you are mentioned. I doubt that the editor would ever let you know about it. MarnetteD|Talk 01:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 May 2015
- From the editor: Your voice is needed: strategic voting in the WMF election
- Traffic report: Inner Core
- News and notes: A dark side of comedy: the Wikipedia volunteers cleaning up behind John Oliver's fowl jokes
- Featured content: Puppets, fungi, and waterfalls
- In the media: Jimmy Wales accepts Dan David Prize
- WikiProject report: Cell-ebrating Molecular Biology
- Arbitration report: Editor conduct the subject of multiple cases
Annayalla
Roland you live in Walthamstow I live in southgate enfield But I'm from annayalla Monaghan Which you keep getting involved in Do you work for Wikipedia od why is it your always editing annyalla — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reidzer84 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
- No, I am just an ordinary editor. As I have explained to you on your talk page, if you want to add information to the page you need to find a reliable secondary source which confirms what you are adding, and you have to establish that the information is significant enough to be added. In this case, you seem to be adding, without any independent sources at all, information of doubtful significance about yourself, and then suggesting that other editors contact the local museum to confirm this. But this is not how Wikipedia works; it is up to you to add the source, and to show the significance. Unsourced trivia will continue to be removed by other editors. RolandR (talk) 19:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 May 2015
- News and notes: WMF releases quarterly reports, annual plans
- Discussion report: A relic from the past that needs to be updated
- Featured content: When music was confined to a ribbon of rust
- Recent research: Drug articles accurate and largely complete; women "slightly overrepresented"; talking like an admin
- Traffic report: Summer, summer, summertime
- Technology report: MediaWiki blows up printers
Amalek 0 through 9
Hi, RolandR. Thought you'd want to know that I made a suggestion to that user on Debresser's talk page. I am cautiously hopeful that it will put a stop to the edit warring. FWIW: Personally, I think his subject is important and needs to be aired. I'm not so sure that Wikipedia is the place to do it. But I do think that at very least if it will happen on Wikipedia, it won't be so disruptive now. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:54, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- The subject may be important, but not the way Amalek was addressing it. I was concerned that s/he was cherry-picking details from a fringe source, apparently to prove a hostile agenda. RolandR (talk) 16:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
- Fair enough, and we'll have to keep an eye on it. But at minimum, this should be happening without disrupting the flow on main articles. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:42, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 June 2015
- News and notes: Three new community-elected trustees announced, incumbents out
- Discussion report: The deprecation of Persondata; RfA – A broken process; Complaints from users on Swedish Wikipedia
- Featured content: It's not over till the fat man sings
- Technology report: Things are getting SPDYier
- Special report: Towards "Health Information for All": Medical content on Wikipedia received 6.5 billion page views in 2013
- Traffic report: A rather ordinary week
Repeated removal by others of my edits of article on Alan Dershowitz
RolandR: I appeal to your obvious much-greater familiarity with the Wikipedia process. I am a complete neophyte.
You offered a comment with regard to an edit I made to Alan Dershowitz' article (involving his opinion about administrative detention being strongly criticized by Fousi El-Asmar). That edit has been now repeatedly completely removed with effectively no reason by another editor. This occurred several times in all, one editor advising me to get consensus (without offering alternative language) and one who claimed a copyright concern (that my investigation of WIkipedia guidelines and policy led me to conclude was not valid).
I have explained my views on the Talk page, and invited the offended editor on his user Talk page to engage this with further explanation or suggested changes, and nothing back yet from anyone.
I am of the firm opinion that my edit regarding Dershowitz is relevant to his status as a public figure who asserts expertise in issues involving Israel, and his intellectual honesty is seriously called into question by El-Asmar's remarks. Having read El-Asmar's personal memoir has led me to conclude that his telling of what he has faced in his life as a Palestinian in Mandatory Palestine/Israel is extremely compelling and credible.
Any advice for a beginning about what is most appropriate to do next? Improvethewiki (talk) 10:27, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, I have been too busy on other matters to look at this closely. But I suspect that part of the objection is due to the length of your edit, which is disproportionate in this article. I think the incident deserves a significantly shorter mention, with pointers to where further information can be found. As I mentioned earlier, I propose to write a new article about Fouzi, in which this incident probably deserves greater prominence. RolandR (talk) 10:37, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
OK, thanks for the feedback. Improvethewiki (talk) 20:17, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Library needs you!
The Wikipedia Library
The Wikipedia Library is expanding, and we need your help! With only a couple of hours per week, you can make a big difference in helping editors get access to reliable sources and other resources. Sign up for one of the following roles:
- Account coordinators help distribute research accounts to editors.
- Partner coordinators seek donations from new partners.
- Outreach coordinators reach out to the community through blog posts, social media, and newsletters or notifications.
- Technical coordinators advise on building tools to support the library's work.
Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:16, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 June 2015
- News and notes: Chapter financial trends analyzed, news in brief
- Traffic report: Two households, both alike in dignity
- Featured content: Just the bear facts, ma'am
- Technology report: Wikimedia sites are going HTTPS only
RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations
There is an RfC that you may be interested in at Template talk:Infobox country#RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations. Please join us and help us to determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:11, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 June 2015
- Arbitration report: An election has consequences
- News and notes: Labs outage kills tools, self; news in brief
- Featured content: Great Dane hits 150
- Discussion report: A quick way of becoming an admin
- WikiProject report: Western Australia speaks – we are back
The Signpost: 24 June 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost tagging initiative
- Featured content: One eye when begun, two when it's done
- Technology report: 2015 MediaWiki architecture focus and Multimedia roadmap announced
- News and notes: Board of Trustees propose bylaw amendments
- Arbitration report: Politics by other means: The American politics 2 arbitration
The Signpost: 01 July 2015
- News and notes: Training the Trainers; VP of Engineering leaves WMF
- In the media: EU freedom of panorama; Nehru outrage; BBC apology
- WikiProject report: Able to make a stand
- Featured content: Viva V.E.R.D.I.
- Traffic report: We're Baaaaack
- Technology report: Technical updates and improvements
The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
- Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
- Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
- Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
- Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
- Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
- Research coordinators: run reference services
Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 July 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation annual plan released, news in brief
- In the media: Wikimania warning; Wikipedia "mystery" easily solved
- Traffic report: The Empire lobs back
- Featured content: Pyrénées, Playmates, parliament and a prison...
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Books and Bytes - Issue 12
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 12, May-June 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)
- New donations - Taylor & Francis, Science, and three new French-language resources
- Expansion into new languages, including French, Finnish, Turkish, and Farsi
- Spotlight: New partners for the Visiting Scholar program
- American Library Association Annual meeting in San Francisco
The Signpost: 15 July 2015
- Op-ed: On paid editing and advocacy: when the Bright Line fails to shine, and what we can do about it
- Traffic report: Belles of the ball
- WikiProject report: What happens when a country is no longer a country?
- News and notes: The Wikimedia Conference and Wikimania
- Featured content: When angels and daemons interrupt the vicious and intemperate
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 22 July 2015
- From the editor: Change the world
- News and notes: Wikimanía 2016; Lightbreather ArbCom case
- Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015 report, part 1, the plenaries
- Traffic report: The Nerds, They Are A-Changin'
- WikiProject report: Some more politics
- Featured content: The sleep of reason produces monsters
- Gallery: "One small step..."
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 29 July 2015
- News and notes: BARC de-adminship proposal; Wikimania recordings debate
- Recent research: Wikipedia and collective intelligence; how Wikipedia is tweeted
- In the media: Is Wikipedia a battleground in the culture wars?
- Featured content: Even mammoths get the Blues
- Traffic report: Namaste again, Reddit
The Signpost: 05 August 2015
- Op-ed: Je ne suis pas Google
- News and notes: VisualEditor, endowment, science, and news in brief
- WikiProject report: Meet the boilerplate makers
- Traffic report: Mrityorma amritam gamaya...
- Featured content: Maya, Michigan, Medici, Médée, and Moul n'ga
The Signpost: 12 August 2015
- News and notes: Superprotect, one year later; a contentious RfA
- In the media: Paid editing; traffic drop; Nicki Minaj
- Wikimanía report: Wikimanía 2015, part 2, a community event
- Traffic report: Fighting from top to bottom
- Featured content: Fused lizards, giant mice, and Scottish demons
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Blog: The Hunt for Tirpitz
The Signpost: 19 August 2015
- Travelogue: Seeing is believing
- Traffic report: Straight Outta Connecticut
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 26 August 2015
- In focus: An increase in active Wikipedia editors
- In the media: Russia temporarily blocks Wikipedia
- News and notes: Re-imagining grants
- Featured content: Out to stud, please call later
- Arbitration report: Reinforcing Arbitration
- Recent research: OpenSym 2015 report
The Signpost: 02 September 2015
- Special report: Massive paid editing network unearthed on the English Wikipedia
- News and notes: Flow placed on ice
- Discussion report: WMF's sudden reversal on Wiki Loves Monuments
- Featured content: Brawny
- In the media: Orangemoody sockpuppet case sparks widespread coverage
- Traffic report: You didn't miss much
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
About Critic of Religions
I just only want to talk about is how why Soviet Communist leader Vladimir Lenin was not the critic of religions, and Soviet Communist Leader Joseph Stalin had the critic of religions? Not so called edit war. Marxistfounder (talk) 16:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 September 2015
- Gallery: Being Welsh
- Featured content: Killed by flying debris
- News and notes: The Swedish Wikipedia's controversial two-millionth article
- Traffic report: Mass media production traffic
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 16 September 2015
- Editorial: No access is no answer to closed access
- News and notes: Byrd and notifications leave, but page views stay; was a terror suspect editing Wikipedia?
- In the media: Is there life on Mars?
- Featured content: Why did the emu cross the road?
- Traffic report: Another week
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 23 September 2015
- In the media: PETA makes "monkey selfie" a three-way copyright battle; Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
- Featured content: Inside Duke Humfrey's Library
- WikiProject report: Dancing to the beat of a... wikiproject?
- Traffic report: ¡Viva la Revolución! Kinda.
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Books and Bytes - Issue 13
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 13, August-September 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)
- New donations - EBSCO, IMF, more newspaper archives, and Arabic resources
- Expansion into new languages, including Viet and Catalan
- Spotlight: Elsevier partnership garners controversy, dialogue
- Conferences: PKP, IFLA, upcoming events
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 September 2015
- Recent research: Wiktionary special; newbies, conflict and tolerance; Is Wikipedia's search function inferior?
- Tech news: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 07 October 2015
- Op-ed: Walled gardens of corruption
- Traffic report: Reality is for losers
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Arbitration report: Warning: Contains GMOs
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 14 October 2015
- WikiConference report: US gathering sees speeches from Andrew Lih, AfroCrowd, and the Archivist of the United States
- News and notes: 2015–2016 Q1 fundraising update sparks mailing list debate
- Traffic report: Screens, Sport, Reddit, and Death
- Featured content: A fistful of dollars
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 21 October 2015
- Editorial: Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching
- In the media: "Wikipedia's hostility to women"
- Special report: One year of GamerGate, or how I learned to stop worrying and love bare rule-level consensus
- Featured content: A more balanced week
- Arbitration report: Four ArbCom cases ongoing
- Traffic report: Hiding under the covers of the Internet
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 28 October 2015
- From the editor: The Signpost's reorganization plan—we need your help
- News and notes: English Wikipedia reaches five million articles
- In the media: The world's Wikipedia gaps; Google and Wikipedia accused of tying Ben Carson to NAMBLA
- Arbitration report: A second attempt at Arbitration enforcement
- Traffic report: Canada, the most popular nation on Earth
- Recent research: Student attitudes towards Wikipedia; Jesus, Napoleon and Obama top "Wikipedia social network"; featured article editing patterns in 12 languages
- Featured content: Birds, turtles, and other things
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
- Community letter: Five million articles
The Signpost: 04 November 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation finances; Superprotect is gone
- In the media: Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov: propaganda myth or history?
- Traffic report: Death, the Dead, and Spectres are abroad
- Featured content: Christianity, music, and cricket
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 11 November 2015
- Arbitration report: Elections, redirections, and a resignation from the Committee
- Discussion report: Compromise of two administrator accounts prompts security review
- Featured content: Texas, film, and cycling
- In the media: Sanger on Wikipedia; Silver on Vox; lawyers on monkeys
- Traffic report: Doodles of popularity
- Gallery: Paris
Hi
Hi, can you locate and translate a short paragraph for me from Hebrew to English?--Makeandtoss (talk) 19:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Probably. What is it you are looking for? RolandR (talk) 19:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Page 29 Can you copy paste the Hebrew text that says that the Battle of Karameh had no aerial opposition encounetered and its respective translation.--Makeandtoss (talk) 19:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Might be this part "השתתפות חיל האוריר
- Page 29 Can you copy paste the Hebrew text that says that the Battle of Karameh had no aerial opposition encounetered and its respective translation.--Makeandtoss (talk) 19:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
נהנה מעליונות האווירחיל של צה"ל שדה המערכה אווירית מוחלטת מעל נ"מ ממקלעים ולמעשה להוציא אש"--Makeandtoss (talk) 19:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
השתתפות חיל האוריר
חיל האוויר של צה"ל נהנה מעליונות אווירית מוחלטת מעל שדה המערכה למעשה להוציא אש נ"מ ממקלעים, ותותחים מהירי ירי לא( מונחי מכ"ם),שנורתה כעיקר מעל מתחמי שונת-נימרין
ומעדי, לא נתקל החיל בכל התנגדו
"Participation of the air force
"The IDF airforce effectively enjoyed total aerial superiority above the battlefield, and with the exception of anti-aircraft fire from sub-machine guns and rapid-fire cannons (not radar guided), which which was fired mainly over that areas of Sunt Nimrin and Ma'adi the airforce met with no opposition".
Was that the bit you needed? RolandR (talk) 20:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- I think so. The structure is a bit confusing, is it saying that no Jordanian aircrafts participated?Makeandtoss (talk) 20:40, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- I can find no reference at all to the Jordanian airforce. I haven't read the whole document. RolandR (talk) 22:55, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
"The airforce met with no opposition"= no Jordanian aircrafts?Makeandtoss (talk) 11:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- I translated what the source says: with the exception of some small-arms fire, there was no opposition. No anti-aircraft fire, no RPGs, no aerial opposition, nothing. But the author does not specify, he simply states the very limited opposition that there was. I think it is safe to conclude from this that the Jordanian Air Force played no role. RolandR (talk) 11:52, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you.--Makeandtoss (talk) 11:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 November 2015
- Special report: ArbCom election—candidates’ opinions analysed
- In the media: Icelandic milestone; apolitical editing
- Discussion report: BASC disbanded; other developments in the discussion world
- Arbitration report: Ban Appeals Subcommittee goes up in smoke; 21 candidates running
- Featured content: Fantasia on a Theme by Jimbo Wales
- Traffic report: Darkness and light
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 November 2015
- News and notes: Fundraising update; FDC recommendations
- Featured content: Caves and stuff
- Traffic report: J'en ai ras le bol
- Arbitration report: Third Palestine-Israel case closes; Voting begins
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Vandalism
I had absolutely no idea that mishmash on Gish happened, I'm trying to make that a good article! I must have accidentally triggered a bunch of keys. It was like 2AM where I was.--Monochrome_Monitor 14:03, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, now I see. One edit was intentional "episode of the Emmy award winning" from an emmy award winning episode. The rest is an enigma. --Monochrome_Monitor 14:06, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- I couldn't work out what had happened, or what you were trying to do. But it was clearly unintentional, so I thought the best was to put it back as it was and let you start again. RolandR (talk) 15:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- I appreciate you assuming good faith. --Monochrome_Monitor 20:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
- I couldn't work out what had happened, or what you were trying to do. But it was clearly unintentional, so I thought the best was to put it back as it was and let you start again. RolandR (talk) 15:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 December 2015
- Op-ed: Whither Wikidata?
- Traffic report: Jonesing for episodes
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Books and Bytes - Issue 14
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 14, October-November 2015
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs)
- New donations - Gale, Brill, plus Finnish and Farsi resources
- Open Access Week recap, and DOIs, Wikipedia, and scholarly citations
- Spotlight: 1Lib1Ref - a citation drive for librarians
The Interior, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:13, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 09 December 2015
- News and notes: ArbCom election results announced
- Gallery: Wiki Loves Monuments 2015 winners
- Traffic report: So do you laugh, or does it cry?
- Featured content: Sports, ships, arts... and some other things
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 16 December 2015
- In the media: Wales in China; #Edit2015
- Arbitration report: GMO case decided
- Featured content: An unusually slow week
- WikiProject report: Women in Red—using teamwork and partnerships to elevate online and offline collaborations
- Traffic report: A feast of Spam
Naytz
Thank you so much for your notification. I was not aware that I wasn't allowed to edit Racism in Israel. However the content I added was correct. In fact although it was slightly adjusted it was basically the same as content which I had added (about condemnation; not about apology- that was indeed mistaken) before the arbitration ruling which you had reverted (I believe wrongly, though you might find my adjusted revision more acceptable.) Please reinstate it. --Naytz (talk) 00:52, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
- Your sources mention just two organisations. These do not constitute "several Jewish organisations", which was what your edit claimed. And, in a section about religious racism in Israel, the views of a former Chief Rabbi of Israel are clearly relevant; the views of two diaspora organisations possibly not. RolandR (talk) 12:35, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 December 2015
- News and notes: WMF Board dismisses community-elected trustee
- Arbitration report: Second Arbitration Enforcement case concludes as another case is suspended
- Featured content: The post-Christmas edition
- Traffic report: The Force we expected
- Year in review: The top ten Wikipedia stories of 2015
- In the media: Wikipedia plagued by a "Basket of Deception"
- Gallery: It's that time of year again
The Signpost: 06 January 2016
- News and notes: The WMF's age of discontent
- In the media: Impenetrable science; Jimmy Wales back in the UAE
- Arbitration report: Catflap08 and Hijiri88 case been decided
- Featured content: Featured menagerie
- WikiProject report: Try-ing to become informed - WikiProject Rugby League
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
WP:AE Report
Hello, please note I have filed a sanction report against you at WP:AESir Joseph (talk) 04:19, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
B'Tselem Fire
Possible 1RR and not Arson. Firstly, you might be in violation of 1RR, and more importantly the fire is not arson. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/11/fire-breaks-out-at-jerusalem-offices-of-human-rights-group-btselem Just take a look at the news reports. I will not revert since I don't want to be in violation of 1RR but I ask you to self-revert. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- No violation of 1RR, since under WP:ARBPIA3#500/30 the IP was not allowed to edit there, and reversions are exempt from the general sanctions. RolandR (talk) 17:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- That's why I said possible, but that doesn't take away from the fact that news reports are saying that the fire is not an arson, it's an electrical fire and as such should most certainly not be in the lead of the article. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- I think your most revision was a 1RR, since the article was edited afterword, you just reverted to add bias to the article, not to revert the IP editor. Please revert or I will report to WP:AE, even B'Tselem admits it wasn't arson. http://forward.com/opinion/329345/why-did-we-assume-btselem-fire-was-arson/ Sir Joseph (talk) 03:45, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- That's why I said possible, but that doesn't take away from the fact that news reports are saying that the fire is not an arson, it's an electrical fire and as such should most certainly not be in the lead of the article. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:34, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
I just reverted you, Roland. With all due respect, I think an adherence to the "letter of the law" has kept you from seeing the sentence for what it is -- a trivial statement about an electrical fire at B'Tselem's office building. In truth, it doesn't belong in the article at all, and certainly not in the lead section. — MShabazz Talk/Stalk 12:46, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
- Fair enough. But the IP should not have been editing there (and, since the article is now semi-protected, no longer can). And this is clearly a content dispute, not meriting the AE report noted below. RolandR (talk) 12:55, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 January 2016
- Community view: Battle for the soul of the WMF
- Editorial: We need a culture of verification
- In focus: The Crisis at New Montgomery Street
- Op-ed: Transparency
- Traffic report: Pattern recognition: Third annual Traffic Report
- Special report: Wikipedia community celebrates Public Domain Day 2016
- News and notes: Community objections to new Board trustee
- Featured content: This Week's Featured Content
- Arbitration report: Interview: outgoing and incumbent arbitrators 2016
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes
There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what What should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:39, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 January 2016
- News and notes: Vote of no confidence; WMF trustee speaks out
- In the media: 15th anniversary news round-up
- Traffic report: Danse Macabre
- Featured content: This week's featured content
Copyright
Hello there, I edited a page regarding Old Connaught House last evening, inserting information of a historical nature along with three photographs I took myself. You deleted all my content and claimed that there was a copyright infringement. I would like to ask why and how you have done this? I have done nothing wrong. I would be very grateful if you would contact me directly at micheal@macsuibhne.co.uk Thank you Micheal Mac Suibhne Oldconnaught (talk) 15:48, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- I will not contact you privately; we should discuss this openly in Wikipedia. I deleted your edits because they were a direct copy from the copyrighted page History of Old Connaught House & Gardens and Festina Lente. This is not permitted on Wikipedia, even if you can establish that you are the copyright holder. All material in Wikipedia is covered by a Creative Commons licence, and, except for brief and attributed citations, we cannot republish copyrighted material. RolandR (talk) 18:21, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 January 2016
- News and notes: Geshuri steps down from the Board
- In the media: Media coverage of the Arnnon Geshuri no-confidence vote
- Recent research: Bursty edits; how politics beat religion but then lost to sports; notability as a glass ceiling
- Traffic report: Death and taxes
- Featured content: This week's featured content
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701
Since I won't be able to edit that article for at least 30 days even if I did make an account, could you possibly review my edits and decide if they meet the standards?
The article as-is is less than optimal and has obviously been written by someone with a less than perfect command of the English language.142.105.159.60 (talk) 20:45, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 03 February 2016
- From the editors: Help wanted
- Special report: Board chair and new trustee speak with the Signpost
- Arbitration report: Catching up on arbitration
- Traffic report: Bowled
- Featured content: This week's featured content
Books & Bytes - Issue 15
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 15, December-January 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs), Sadads (talk · contribs), Nikkimaria (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)
- New donations - Ships, medical resources, plus Arabic and Farsi resources
- #1lib1ref campaign summary and highlights
- New branches and coordinators
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 17 February 2016
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: Super Bowling
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
The Signpost: 24 February 2016
- Special report: WMF in limbo as decision on Tretikov nears
- Op-ed: Backward the Foundation
- Traffic report: Of Dead Pools and Dead Judges
- Arbitration report: Arbitration motion regarding CheckUser & Oversight inactivity
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Technology report: Tech news in brief
Just as a curiosity
I wonder if your research skills can fish out Robert Wistrich's coining of the term '(contemporary) anti-Semitic anti-Zionism' in Hebrew in a talk he gave on 10 December 1984 to the Study Circle on World Jewry, in the home of the President of Israel Chaim Herzog, which is now being appropriated as if it were something novel. The translated version is at Robert Wistrich, Anti-zionism as an Expression of Anti-Semitism in Recent Years. That's the earliest example I've found. All we have with the new appropriation of this old word is an attempt to strip it of its complexities and stick it exclusively on 'the left', which is what you would expect of a media hack like Alan Johnson. Pierre Birnbaum in his French works long ago analysed anti-Semitic anti-zionism as a characteristic of the radical French right, like Le Pen. Best wishes Nishidani (talk) 14:28, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- The translation is on the site of the Vidal Sassoon International Center for the Study of Antisemitism, which also includes a recording of the lecture. Strangely, however, they do not seem to have a transcript of the original lecture. I have listened to the first five minutes, in which it is explained that Wistrich is still learning Hebrew. My assumption, though this is not stated, is that he actually wrote this lecture in English, and then translated it (possibly with assistance) to Hebrew. The opening of the lecture is not the same as the English translation. I will have to make time to listen to this properly, in order to answer your query; I'll try to do this over the weekend. RolandR (talk) 17:40, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry for the bother (in a way), but this opens up a fascinating possibility, that the said phrase might not have been used then (10 Dec 1984) but added later to the Hebrew version. Just the sort of philogical intrigue I love. It's unfortunate that my curiosity about it barges into your time though. Very best, and thanks Nishidani (talk) 18:38, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- I think you misunderstood me. The December 1984 lecture,[1] which I plan to listen to over the weekend, was in Hebrew. The phrase may have been added to the English translation on the site; I will be in a position to let you know after I have listened to it. RolandR (talk) 22:02, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry for the bother (in a way), but this opens up a fascinating possibility, that the said phrase might not have been used then (10 Dec 1984) but added later to the Hebrew version. Just the sort of philogical intrigue I love. It's unfortunate that my curiosity about it barges into your time though. Very best, and thanks Nishidani (talk) 18:38, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 March 2016
- News and notes: Wikipedia Zero: Orange mobile partnership in Africa ends; the evolution of privacy loss in Wikipedia
- In the media: Wales at SXSW; lawsuit over Wikipedia PR editing
- Discussion report: Is an interim WMF executive director inherently notable?
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Technology report: Watchlists, watchlists, watchlists!
- Traffic report: Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States
- Wikipedia Weekly: Podcast #119: The Foundation and the departure of Lila Tretikov
Notification
Thank you for the WP:ACDS warning on my talk page which I can only assume was made in good faith, nevertheless, as so many Israel haters are prone to point out, anti-Semitism and hatred of Israel are not necessarily synonymous so please do not conflate the two. In this case, this ruling clearly does not apply, because it is about Sizer's dissemination of anti-Semitic material, and not about the Arab-Israeli conflict. Clivel 0 (talk) 22:23, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
- Don't try to teach your grandmother to suck eggs. And the ruling certainly does apply to edits relating to anti-Zionism. RolandR (talk) 00:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 23 March 2016
- News and notes: Lila Tretikov a Young Global Leader; Wikipediocracy blog post sparks indefinite blocks
- In the media: Angolan file sharers cause trouble for Wikipedia Zero; the 3D printer edit war; a culture based on change and turmoil
- Traffic report: Be weary on the Ides of March
- Editorial: "God damn it, you've got to be kind."
- Featured content: Watch out! A slave trader, a live mascot and a crested serpent awaits!
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel article 3 case amended
- Wikipedia Weekly: Podcast #120: Status of Wikimania 2016
The Signpost: 1 April 2016
- News and notes: Trump/Wales 2016
- WikiProject report: Why should the Devil have all the good music? An interview with WikiProject Christian music
- Traffic report: Donald v Daredevil
- Featured content: A slow, slow week
- Technology report: Browse Wikipedia in safety? Use Telnet!
- Recent research: "Employing Wikipedia for good not evil" in education; using eyetracking to find out how readers read articles
- Wikipedia Weekly: Podcast #121: How April Fools went down
I am intrested to know
Is there a point in being Jewish when you are a an Anti-Zionistic communist? I mean, if you were Haredi, I would understand, but you are Marxist-Atheist and you are also seem to oppose "Racist Jews", at least this is the only ethnic group that you mention in your userpage that is racist (And I suppose I am one of them).--Bolter21 (talk to me) 19:52, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- That makes as much sense as asking " Is there any point being male when you are pro-feminist?" That is, no sense at all. I am Jewish, that is aan objective statement of fact. And, as an anti-racist, of course I oppose Zionism. I have no idea whether Bolter is either Jewish or a racist, so I cannot comment on his other remarks. RolandR (talk) 23:03, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- There's a difference between being a male and being Jewish. You can deny the fact you are a male but you can't deny the fact that biologically, you are a male. Being Jewish though, is an almost purely subjective thing, you can choose if you are or not a Jew. But since you are Marxist and Atheist, as well as Anti-Zionist, what holds you as a Jew? I am an Israeli, I am a Zionist, I am an Apatheist and I feel solidarity with other Jews everywhere. Since you claim you are not connected to Judaism by religion and you oppse Zionism and you are also a Marxist, I still don't get why still call yourself a Jew and not just a "human being". To me it sounds like a clash of ideologies, it seems you share more ideologies with anti-semitics rather than Jews.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 06:44, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your very intelligent and perceptive comments. I must admit that I have never thought of things that way; you have obliged me to completely rethink my life. Goodbye. RolandR (talk) 11:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- You are welcome. (assuming you don't feel like answering)--Bolter21 (talk to me) 14:52, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for your very intelligent and perceptive comments. I must admit that I have never thought of things that way; you have obliged me to completely rethink my life. Goodbye. RolandR (talk) 11:17, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
- There's a difference between being a male and being Jewish. You can deny the fact you are a male but you can't deny the fact that biologically, you are a male. Being Jewish though, is an almost purely subjective thing, you can choose if you are or not a Jew. But since you are Marxist and Atheist, as well as Anti-Zionist, what holds you as a Jew? I am an Israeli, I am a Zionist, I am an Apatheist and I feel solidarity with other Jews everywhere. Since you claim you are not connected to Judaism by religion and you oppse Zionism and you are also a Marxist, I still don't get why still call yourself a Jew and not just a "human being". To me it sounds like a clash of ideologies, it seems you share more ideologies with anti-semitics rather than Jews.--Bolter21 (talk to me) 06:44, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
The Signpost: 14 April 2016
- News and notes: Denny Vrandečić resigns from Wikimedia Foundation board
- In the media: Wikimedia Sweden loses copyright case; Tex Watson; AI assistants; David Jolly biography
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: A welcome return to pop culture and death
- Arbitration report: The first case of 2016—Wikicology
- Gallery: A history lesson
Books & Bytes - Issue 16
The Wikipedia Library
Books & Bytes
Issue 16, February-March 2016
by The Interior (talk · contribs), UY Scuti (talk · contribs)
- New donations - science, humanities, and video resources
- Using hashtags in edit summaries - a great way to track a project
- A new cite archive template, a new coordinator, plus conference and Visiting Scholar updates
- Metrics for the Wikipedia Library's last three months
The Interior via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
Help
Hi RolandR, can you please give your opinion on the censorship issue on Talk:Yisrael Katz (politician born 1955)? 2A02:C7D:3FDE:D400:34AC:583A:B24A:5AF3 (talk) 15:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)