My name is Ron Daker!

Speedy deletion nomination of Kazakhstan, Greatest Country in the World

edit
 

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Kazakhstan, Greatest Country in the World, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. →Στc. 21:31, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

December 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Kazakhstan, Greatest Country in the World, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. --Davejohnsan (talk) 21:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Kazakhstan, Greatest Country in the World, you may be blocked from editing. Slon02 (talk) 21:43, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ron Daker (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't know what you're talking about, I'm not John... there's no relationship at all Ron Daker (talk) 23:44, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

The sockpuppetry is pretty evident, given how both accounts have engaged in the same juvenile Borat-related vandalism. Kinu t/c 00:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ron Daker (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I like to make sexy time!

Decline reason:

Well you'll have to make it elsewhere, because your Talk page access has been revoked -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.