Ron Gaba

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Enterprise architecture. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Roleplayer (talk) 18:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Commercial links keep popping up for SPARX Systems - not OK!

Ron Gaba (talk) 18:28, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Enterprise architecture, without explaining the reason for the removal in the edit summary. Unexplained removal of content does not appear constructive, and your edit has been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox for test edits. Thank you. Roleplayer (talk) 18:29, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Enterprise architecture, you will be blocked from editing. Roleplayer (talk) 18:35, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Enterprise architect, you will be blocked from editing. Roleplayer (talk) 18:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Stop adding commercial links to SPARK Systems - this is against WIKI policy!!

Ron Gaba (talk) 18:40, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

The templates you keep removing are there to help improve the article, they have nothing whatsoever to do with SPARK systems. Because you have consistently ignored requests to stop doing that I have reported you to the administrators. -- Roleplayer (talk) 18:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Enterprise Architect" redirects here. For the UML modeling tool, see Sparx Enterprise Architect.

Please remove immediately

This is a commerical link that must be removed. Either all commercial links be left or all removed.

Ron Gaba (talk) 03:57, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

It's not a commercial link at all. Please stop what you're doing and take some time to read what others have said, both here and in the article that you're editing. You're at risk of being blocked for a short period if you continue editing the way you have (see WP:3RR and WP:VAN. You're removing a standard Otheruses4 disambiguation template that links to Sparx Enterprise Architect to help those who went to Enterprise architect by mistake.

Please read and consider contributing to the discussion in Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Enterprise_architecture, where you are listed as a party. --Ronz (talk) 17:25, 19 February 2008 (UTC)