Roobinstein
Roobinstein, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Roobinstein! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC) |
April 2019
editHello, I'm Serial Number 54129. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Lembit Öpik, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! ——SerialNumber54129 12:17, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, colleague! I agree with your motivation. But different media have an information about Opik's participation in Asgardia project and his position of Chairman of Parliament of this project:
- https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/gadgets-and-tech/news/space-kingdom-asgardia-nation-iq-tests-citizens-a8417276.html
- https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/local-hubs/mid-wales/2018/07/03/new-job-for-lembit-is-out-of-this-world/
- https://www.totalpolitics.com/articles/diary/lembit-opik-be-new-mp-first-ever-nation-outer-space
- https://news.yahoo.com/head-space-nation-aims-stars-183056989.html
- http://es.rfi.fr/ciencia/20180626-que-es-asgardia-la-primera-nacion-espacial-autoproclamada
- https://www.afr.com/lifestyle/if-you-dont-like-the-way-your-country-is-run-just-found-a-new-one-20181203-h18nb6
- Some of the sources were noted in the Wiki article. I think the infomation could be in the article. May be in a more shorter form. Sincerely yours, Roobinstein (talk) 12:36, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, it worth a passing mention, not with the huge prominence it was given before. . . Mean as custard (talk) 14:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- See the article now: in section 2010 and beyond. Roobinstein (talk) 14:51, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, it worth a passing mention, not with the huge prominence it was given before. . . Mean as custard (talk) 14:48, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editThe article Mikhail Spokoyny has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Seems to be a relatively unremarkable academic; I believe he fails WP:PROF, the notability guideline for academics and scientists. There's little in the article that amounts to a serious claim of notability, and none of the references constitute significant coverage from an independent source.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robofish (talk) 21:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)