Roscoe x

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions. Please note that simple definitions should be made at Wiktionary, rather than here. Your article on Source routing has moved there now. You can find it at Wiktionary - Source_routing.

Here's some tips:

• If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.
• You can sign your name using three tildes, like ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too.
• If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
• If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page.

Other useful pages are: how to edit, how to write a great article, naming conventions, manual of style and the Wikipedia policies.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Angela. 20:44, Jan 22, 2004 (UTC)

---

I saw the articles you created today on Lucky Luke and Jaap - good stuff! Both were new to me, which is what is fun about Wikipedia.

But I wonder if you could try to create them a bit more in standard Wikipedia style. Tintin is a good example of what I mean, although that's a pretty big article, that a lot of people have worked on. You probably won't make something that big, at least not to start off. It's more work to write articles like that, I know, but they are much more readable and useful that way. - DavidWBrooks 14:43, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)

---

Hi, I was a bit surprised by your stub article Efficient learning method. Is this term really beig used by anybody? Also, the name "efficient" seems to make claims that are not substantiated to say the least. Perhaps they do use "alternatives to textbooks", but how efficient it ends up we do not really know, and judging by the word on the street about distance education, it probably is not as great as they make it out to be. I feel incompetent enough in this topic to stay away from it, but I would guess that we must show a more critical attitude to the bright ideas of distance education and not repeat word for word their ad brochures. Watcher 11:50, 23 May 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I agree wholeheartedly with what you said about computer graphics and stuff being potentially useful for some things. It's just that there is a long, sad history of similarly sounding things being pushed for teaching disciplines where such methods are at best useless. So I guess that this kind of POV has to be represented prominently in such articles. That being said, I do not have much time to dedicate to it lately, so yeah, let's trust the Wikimagic. Watcher 10:16, 28 May 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I just came across your article on Efficient learning method and decided to write to you about it, not knowing that someone else had already done the same. Now half a year has passed, and I think we should do something about the article. I think it could/should be merged with some similar educational topic, but I wanted to contact you before being bold. What do you think? <KF> 00:36, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)

Image:AboutNCNU.jpg

Image deletion warning

The image Image:AboutNCNU.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 13:25, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

• If it is a logo, use {{logo}}, that allows us to track what is a logo. Cheers. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 22:54, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
  • Sure. It is now tagged. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 02:08, May 31, 2005 (UTC)

Image nomination

You didn't put it in right - Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. • Thorpe • 16:36, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi Roscoe,

I just wanted to comment on your Mont-Saint-Michel nomination on FPC. Having been around on FPC for quite a while, I realise that it might seem dispiriting to be getting so many oppose votes. However in this case it is almost a positive sign. Normally if people don't like an image you just see two or three oppose votes and no one else bothers to vote. In this case, the fact that quite a number of people have voted already suggests to me they might well have supported, were it not for the technical quality issues. -- Solipsist 22:23, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks

Saw your note about my id:wiki page -- it's looking great! Thanks for doing this for me!

paul klenk ^talk 17:02, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

dabbing

Sorry for the intrusion i was just doing some dabbing on keyboard Gnangarra 15:25, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

Copyright issue with Telkomsel

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Telkomsel, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.telkomsel.com/web/company_profile. As a copyright violation, Telkomsel appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Telkomsel has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Telkomsel. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Telkomsel, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. — Indon (reply) — 16:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Ncnu logo.gif

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ncnu logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Blocked area.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Blocked area.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Blocked area1.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Blocked area1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Blocked area2.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Blocked area2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Outdoor activity

Outdoor activity, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Outdoor activity satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outdoor activity and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Outdoor activity during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — iridescent (talk to me!) 20:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Unpredictable event

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Unpredictable event, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Nothing more than a dictionary definition

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — Swpb^{τ • c} 22:52, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:SacredHeartCathedralOfShenyang.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SacredHeartCathedralOfShenyang.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Alternative wine closure 1.JPG listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alternative wine closure 1.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:29, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

You're invited to LangCamp 2012

Hello, Wikimedia Australia will holding Language Camp 2012 at the University of Indonesia on 6-7 December 2012.

The workshop has two streams: Indigenous Languages and OER (Open educational resources).

If you are interested to come and would like to ask more information please contact the committee: committee@wikimedia.org.au

For further information please visit: v:LangCamp_2012

FFernando.02 (talk) 10:23, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)