RoyalGurjar

Mentioned

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You've been mentioned at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gurjeshwar. You may respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:24, 21 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RoyalGurjar (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No, I again request you to unblock me and it is wrong interpretation me as sock puppet. Please do not add my identity with else as i am new and not a frequent wiki editor. I will appreciate your positive step to unblock me, i promise to follow as per rules of Wikipedia if you still not consider my request to unblock me then it will be my last visit on Wikipedia Thanks RoyalGurjar (talk) 17:32, 21 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I have compared your editing history with that of Gurjeshwar, and there are far too many similarities for it to be plausible that you are not the same person. Also, what you say in your unblock request makes it totally clear that this is not your first account. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 21:25, 22 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Add topic