User talk:Rritaa/Peja Bath
So far so good. Keep developing the article. Don't forget to do a short introduction. --Arianit (talk) 19:49, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hi, you don't need a conclusion for your article. You can remove it safely. --Λeternus (talk) 13:49, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
KTC's comment
editLose the "Introduction" section header at the start. Unlink "Peja", and bolden "Peja Bath". The introduction say where Peja Bath is, it doesn't actually say what it is. Imagine someone with no knowledge of the subject of the article (i.e. me) reading this. This person should be able to read the introduction and get a quick understanding on what and where Peja Bath is, and what's special about it. Then the rest of the article will go on and expand on the details.
There's too much unnecessary details under Location section. If you want to include its exact coordinate, there's templates that can let you add it to the top right of an article, and or in an infobox. It's not relevant within the text of the article.
Overall, tone need to be a little bit more encyclopedic. It is a bit promotional at the moment. And of course, we need references!!! -- KTC (talk) 07:28, 1 March 2014 (UTC)