Rubberduckieyouretheone
Welcome!
edit
|
Nomination of Boosweet Records for deletion
edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Boosweet Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boosweet Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. !dave 20:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
Please choose one straw of many.Xx236 (talk) 09:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Came across this while new page reviewing & am not entirely sure this worthy individual meets WP:GNG; if there was an aricle on Be Straw Free (which imo is notable) I'd favour redirecting to it...TheLongTone (talk) 16:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to join Women in Red
edit We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.49% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Our priorities for March: | ||
|
To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
--Ipigott (talk) 15:32, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi there, Rubberduckieyouretheone, and welcome to Women in Red. As a relatively new editor, you might be interested in our Ten Simple Rules for Creating Women's Biographies. If ever you need any help or run into any problems, please let me know or post a message on the WiR talk page. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 12:04, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 at Women in Red
edit|
| ||
|
To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
Copyright problem on Louise Harpman
editSome of the content you included in the above article appears to have been copied from http://louiseharpman.com/bio. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
May 2018 at Women in Red
edit   
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Wiki Loves Food
edit
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 02:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Categories
editPlease don't add individuals to top-level categories like "Artists", "Sculptors" etc. It just creates work for other people to keep these categories clear. There are always one or more relevant sub-categories, and you should always add at the lowest appropriate category. Thanks. Johnbod (talk) 13:30, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Women in Red June Editathons
edit|
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2018 at Women in Red
edit|
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Invitation to participate in study
editHello,
I am E. Whittaker, I am working with Wikimedia’s Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.
Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 21:57, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
August 2018 at Women in Red
edit|
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
September 2018 at Women in Red
edit|
| ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
October 2018 at Women in Red
edit|
| ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
edit|
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
List of Macedonian women writers moved to draftspace
editAn article you recently created, List of Macedonian women writers, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:19, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @CASSIOPEIA: I'm actually confused by this decision to move the article to draft space. I noticed, in a list of international women's writers, that this page didn't yet exist. I looked at many other similar pages from List of Greek women writers, List of Bangladeshi women writers, List of Bolivian women writers, etc. None of them have references since all of the writers have links to other internal wiki pages. I'd love to understand why this page would be different - I can go in and find references for each of these writers, but I'm not sure why it's necessary. I was hoping to just start the page that is missing and for others to eventually add other writers and more details. Thanks so much. Rubberduckieyouretheone (talk) 07:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Rubberduckieyouretheone, Greetings to you. Please note that Lists do need group sources or it would use individual notability source if group sources would not be located. Lists is subject to notability requirement - pls see WP:LISTN. In Wikipedia there are thousand of article in the mainspace which are not notable or/and content claimed without a single source. One of the reasons is that Wikipedia editors are all volunteers and with only about 650 reviewers where by only half is active. We have close to 400 -500 articles submitted daily in AfC and NPP and many slip of our reviewing date or reviewrs do not know Lists also need sources to support subject notability and make to mainspace and one of the way to delete the article is via AfD nomination. Editor should not take what is in the mainspace as benchmark instead show follow the guidelines and good take sample of rate GA articles. What you need to do for this article to be accepted is to include independent, reliable sources which they would be easily located since the subjects in the lists already have their pages in Wikipedia. Just go to those pages and you should be able to find some of the sources there and inline citate them. Check out for referencing instruction. Once you have provide the inline citation, submit the draft article and send me a message and I will review it. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:56, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @CASSIOPEIA:, I've updated the references as much as I can for now and I hope this will be enough to get the article up. This is great way for me to learn. Thanks! Rubberduckieyouretheone (talk) 07:15, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Rubberduckieyouretheone, Greetings to you. Please note that Lists do need group sources or it would use individual notability source if group sources would not be located. Lists is subject to notability requirement - pls see WP:LISTN. In Wikipedia there are thousand of article in the mainspace which are not notable or/and content claimed without a single source. One of the reasons is that Wikipedia editors are all volunteers and with only about 650 reviewers where by only half is active. We have close to 400 -500 articles submitted daily in AfC and NPP and many slip of our reviewing date or reviewrs do not know Lists also need sources to support subject notability and make to mainspace and one of the way to delete the article is via AfD nomination. Editor should not take what is in the mainspace as benchmark instead show follow the guidelines and good take sample of rate GA articles. What you need to do for this article to be accepted is to include independent, reliable sources which they would be easily located since the subjects in the lists already have their pages in Wikipedia. Just go to those pages and you should be able to find some of the sources there and inline citate them. Check out for referencing instruction. Once you have provide the inline citation, submit the draft article and send me a message and I will review it. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:56, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
- Hi Rubberduckieyouretheone, Good day. Thank you for updating the article with inline citation. The article has been reviewed and now is in the main space. Thank you for your contribution and happy editing. Do pop by my talk page if you anything I can help. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:03, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Macedonian women writers has been accepted
edit
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:59, 11 November 2018 (UTC)December 2018 at Women in Red
edit|
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
December 2018 at Women in Red
edit|
Continuing: | ||
|
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
January 2019 at Women in Red
edit|
 January events:
|
February 2019 at Women in Red
edit|
 February events:
|
March 2019 at Women in Red
edit|
   Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
|
April editathons at Women in Red
editApril 2019
edit|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
edit|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events with WIR
edit|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July events from Women in Red!
edit|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2019 at Women in Red
edit|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019 at Women in Red
edit|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October Events from Women in Red
edit|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Deletion discussion about Inez Ortiz
editHello, Rubberduckieyouretheone
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Elmidae and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Inez Ortiz, should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inez Ortiz .
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Elmidae}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
November 2019 at Women in Red
edit|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Millennium Management, which you proposed for deletion, because its deletion has previously been contested or viewed as controversial. Proposed deletion is not for controversial deletions. For this reason, proposed deletion is disallowed on articles that have previously been de-prodded, even by the page's creator, or which have previously been listed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{proposed deletion}} template back to the article, but feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! —KuyaBriBriTalk 14:59, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- @Kuyabribri: Thanks. Sorry. I never did this before. I'll go add the AfD tag now. Rubberduckieyouretheone (talk) 07:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
edit | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December events with WIR
edit|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020 at Women in Red
edit|
|
February with Women in Red
edit|
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2020 at Women in Red
edit|
  Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
edit|
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020 at Women in Red
edit|
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2020 at Women in Red
edit| June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red
edit|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
edit|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons
edit|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red
edit|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November edith-a-thons from Women in Red
edit|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December with Women in Red
edit|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red!
edit
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Milo Cress for deletion
edit The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milo Cress until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article Marco Borges has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails to meet WP:NBIO; only source that can be accessed is own website/company (or maybe not, it is marked "failed verification".
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Marco Borges for deletion
edit The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marco Borges until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.