Rugby9090
Welcome!
editHello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 12:56, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Rugby9090, you are invited to the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hi Rugby9090! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 21 September 2016 (UTC) |
Citing policies
editPlease do not citing Wikipedia policies, as you have done here, without having first read them and understood them. If you continue to do this it will be considered WP:Disruptive editing. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:11, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
User:Kautilya3 please go through WP:FRINGE. Author must provide valid citation and should not give WP:UNDUE.
Rugby9090 (talk) 20:39, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Request for unblock
edit
Rugby9090 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This Morning my account had been blocked without any intimation from admins or other users. I have checked the Block list [1] and came to know that Kautilya3 has reported it as alleged sock puppet [2]. I would like to clarify Admin so that they can reevaluate and also request them to please give at least 24 hours before placing any block on any user to give them a chance for proper justification.
Reasons Explained: 1./2. My Account has been recently created and Focused on a particular issue. Answer : Yes, this account is recently created. WP:NEWSEVENT 'Breaking News' Article [3] has persuaded me to share my views. Hence my focus was on this article.
3. My signature are always on formating basis. some time on same line and some time on other. [1] I believe all authors tend to consider format before sharing.
4. I have always tried to cited policies to inform users about Wikipedia policies. You can also check any post, there are valid justification.
5. Yes, i believe Kautilya3 has not responded with constructive authorship. I have requested him many time on Article Talk Page. Based on his request, I have created NPOV Notice Board [4] and DRN [5]
6. My response time also vary from time to time. Some time it takes up to 1 hour if i have to read and analyse [6]
In addition, I have always respected other authors and have not contributed on article page. All my communications are on Talk Page.
As per analysis by GeneralizationsAreBad, I feel its completely hypothetical and doesn't correspond to facts / log. As for DRN request, it was done on request of Kautilya3 [7]. Secondly it took me around 2 hours to file DRN as first 3 DRN request resulted in API Error (Admins can verify this from log)
I would request to RegentsPark to re-evaluate and re-consider based on facts like Accounts, IP, above given responses and i would ask other admins Mark_Arsten Doug_Weller NeilN to please look into this matter and give their neutral opinion.
Decline reason:
WP:Checkuser confirms that you were using WP:open proxies to edit, which is itself a sufficient reason not to unblock you. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- OK, then. Checkuser needed - Please compare this account to Smart.maverick (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and KnowledgeSearcher (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki). That should help clear things up. Thanks, GABgab 15:28, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
- I'd also support a checkuser to clear things up. If he's not a sockpuppet, he should be unblocked ASAP.VR talk 14:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)