RugbyNE66
Welcome
edit
|
Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot
edit
|
Hi RugbyNE66! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
September 2013
edit
Hello, I'm Noq. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Alnwick RFC, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please do not add in lists of non notable people to this article. It is not the clubs website and this information does not belong in an encyclopaedia entry. noq (talk) 10:42, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Lots of rugby websites have these sort of lists eg West Hartlepool R.F.C. please can you leave my page alone whilst I sort references out
- Please discuss on the article talk page rather than re-insert the list. As explained above and in the edit summaries I left, this is not appropriate in an encyclpaedia article - just because some other pages have them, does not mean you should add them here. noq (talk) 11:02, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
just leave it alone stop being so pedantic!!!! im adding sources as I type
Newcastle Falcons has a squad list loads of rugby pages do leave Alnwicks alone!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Please stop it. WP:edit warring is not productive. Please read WP:verifiability and WP:OWNER. You appear to be trying to create a website for the club rather than an encyclopaedia entry about it. None of the people listed are in any way notable and the likelyhood is none of them ever will be. Listing details of the scores of these people is not in any way appropriate to an encyclopaedia and just reverting without discussing is contrary to the way wikipedia works. Please read WP:BRD - you were bold and added the list, I reverted and so you should now be discussing the matter on the article talk page rather than just reverting again. The Newcastle article is not really relevant as tier 1 teams consist of notable people and have plenty of WP:reliable sources available. Despite your last entry, no sources about this have been added anyway. BTW, in the talk pages, you should end your comments with a signature, this can be added automatically by typing ~~~~ at the end. noq (talk) 11:25, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Douglas R.U.F.C.
Ramsey R.U.F.C.
no body seems to mind about this ???? Whats the issue with Alnwick??
- Thanks for pointing those articles out - they have been corrected. Just because WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, it is no reason to add more stuff that should not be there. Lots of articles exist, many that few people ever look at, so things like that can exist for a long time until its noticed. The issue is not specifically with Alnwick but with things that really do not belong in such an article. Please read the links provided earlier and in the welcome message at the top of this page and get to know what Wikipedia is about. noq (talk) 18:30, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Your recent edits
edit Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:46, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit
Hello, RugbyNE66. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)